Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 7 Mar 2016

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Heather Yaxley

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Heather Yaxley

  • Postcode verified

    CB4 2BD

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−14Mixedmore positive than 17% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveconsistentlyhigh-qualitypositivewell supportedimprovedfeel safesuccessfully
Criticismnot alwaysrisk of harmnot good enoughcompromisedtoo manyseriousexclusions

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1115w−14
  • What needs to improve65w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,152
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
20%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 91%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 4%

Full report text

Ms Jenny Nimmo Head of School TBAP Cambridge AP Academy Ascham Road Cambridge Cambridgeshire CB4 2BD

p.1

Academy

Following my visit to your school on 3 February 2016, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and the time you took to discuss behaviour in your school.

p.1

Academy

The inspection was a monitoring inspection conducted under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for inspecting schools with no formal designation. The inspection was carried out because Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector was concerned about behaviour at the school.

p.1

Evidence

 observations of pupils’ behaviour and their attitudes to learning in lessons

p.1

Evidence

 observations of pupils’ behaviour throughout the day, including discussion with pupils

p.1

Evidence

 discussions with school leaders and staff.

p.1

Evidence

Having evaluated the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Evidence

Leaders and managers have taken effective action to improve behaviour and secure consistently positive attitudes to learning. Ofsted

p.1

Evidence

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Context

The school has been open for four months and is part of the Tri-Borough Alternative Provision Trust (TBAP), a multi-academy trust. Since TBAP took responsibility for the premises, accommodation, staff and pupils of the pupil referral unit, there have been significant changes to staffing and curricular arrangements.

p.2

Context

There are 36 pupils on roll. All pupils have social, emotional or mental health needs. There are no pupils with a statement of special educational needs or an education, health and care plan. Twenty-one pupils are in Year 11 and others are in Years 9 and 10.

p.2

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

The transition from a pupil referral unit to a school has been difficult for staff and pupils. A lot has changed. Senior leaders and the trust identified right from the start that significant changes had to happen to improve pupils’ behaviour and academic achievement. The actions taken are appropriate but the changes have not been whole-heartedly supported by the pupils or staff. The enormity of the changes created uncertainty and anxiety for staff and pupils. Many staff left, which created instability. This instability, together with higher expectations of pupils’ conduct and attendance, led to a deterioration of some pupils’ behaviour. Almost all of the vacancies are now filled with permanent staff. Staff believe that, given more time, the changes will result in the improvements required. The trust believes that, by the end of this academic year, pupils’ behaviour and achievement will improve significantly. It is too soon to judge the difference that changes will make to the

p.2

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

Staff welcome and value the support from the trust and from other academies in the trust, particularly the increased support provided recently in response to the deteriorating behaviour of some pupils. The behaviour policy is applied consistently and staff feel well supported by the senior team. When pupils’ behaviour deteriorates, staff know what to do and are suitably trained to respond appropriately. As a result, the behaviour of some pupils has improved. Others still find it difficult to work within the higher expectations and their behaviour is not good enough.

p.2

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

There have been times during the school’s short history when pupils’ behaviour has compromised their personal safety and the safety of staff. Discussions with staff and pupils, together with records of incidents, indicate that pupils who joined the school after October 2015 often behave better than those who transferred from the pupil referral unit. During this inspection, pupils’ attitudes were often good when working with staff individually or in pairs. When in groups, especially at breaktimes, pupils’ language and attitudes deteriorated. When incidents occurred and staff intervened, pupils were quick to take a look, although they then quickly resumed their play or learning. Discussions with staff indicate that this is an improvement from previous occasions, when pupils would join in and make matters worse.

p.2

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

Senior staff and the trust acknowledge that there are too many temporary exclusions. Some exclusions are for serious incidents, such as physical assault and extensive damage to property. However, most exclusions are for less than two days at a time and the use of exclusion is starting to reduce the incidence of some inappropriate behaviour, such as smoking on site and refusing to go to lessons. Plans are in place so that, in the near future, most inappropriate behaviour is managed without excluding pupils.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

There are mixed views among staff about how they feel about their own safety, particularly when pupils break windows. Pupils say that they feel safe.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

The actions taken have successfully established the importance of learning and good behaviour. The changes are starting to make a difference to pupils and staff.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

 Pupils now attend full time. Having been used to part-time programmes, some pupils have found this difficult. Although some pupils are too late on too many days, others are on time, attend each day and participate fully in lessons.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

 Changes to the curriculum mean that pupils study for a suitable range of qualifications that are at the right level for their ability. Pupils generally like the subjects, especially the practical ones.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

 Almost all pupils now respect the new code of conduct, including wearing the school’s uniform and handing in mobile phones and cigarettes.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

 The recent addition of three senior leaders has increased the potential to support staff and pupils. These leaders bring a wealth of experience and knowledge. They are already respected by staff for their support and for the way that they model effective management of pupils’ behaviour.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

The premises and accommodation do not provide pupils or staff with the high-quality educational resources that they are entitled to. In addition, the nature of the premises and accommodation increase the risk of harm to pupils and staff. However, the risks are assessed appropriately, and high levels of supervision and vigilance minimise the risks as much as possible. A meeting between the trust and the local authority is about to take place to discuss these issues. The issues include:

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

 the exterior walls and doors of most classrooms are made almost entirely of glass and the glass is not shatterproof

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

 most classrooms are not attached to the main building and doors open directly on to the playground  the playground is not separated from the car park

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

 there are no suitable facilities for assembly, dining, indoor physical education or practical science lessons.

p.4

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

Some areas of the school’s work observed during this inspection require further consideration in order to maximise the opportunities to improve pupils’ behaviour and learning. For example:

p.4

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

 some staff gave too little attention to pupils that were behaving appropriately

p.4

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

 tutor time was not always calm or productive

p.4

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

 staff did not always expect pupils to get to class on time and learning time was lost

p.4

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

 pupils did not have enough to do at playtimes and wandered around in groups rather than interacting with adults.

p.4

Priorities for further improvement

 Reward appropriate behaviour frequently and sufficiently.

p.4

Priorities for further improvement

 Provide pupils with good opportunities to play cooperatively.

p.4

Priorities for further improvement

 Resolve issues about the condition and suitability of the premises and accommodation as a matter of urgency.

p.4

Priorities for further improvement

I am copying this letter to the trust, the Regional Schools Commissioner and the Director of Children’s Services for Cambridgeshire County Council. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion