Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Children's Home run by My Choice Children’s Homes Limited in West Sussex

Inspected 9 Feb 2016 · published 3 Mar 2016 · URN SC029865

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Stephen Collett

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    9 Feb 2016

  • Inspectors verified

    Stephen Collett

  • URN verified

    SC029865

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−70Very criticalmore positive than 4% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivetimely
Criticisminsufficientbreachfailedpoorat riskharmdeclinednot consistently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings680w−65
  • What needs to improve132w−62

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
809
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 62%What needs to improve 12%About the inspection 26%

Full report text

This monitoring visit

This monitoring visit took place following a Declined in effectiveness judgement made at the interim inspection on 18 December 2015. Subsequently, a compliance notice was issued on 24 December 2015, requiring the home to make improvements to admission procedures by 8 February 2016. This monitoring visit focused on what progress has been made to rectify the breach of regulation specified in the compliance notice. An acting manager took responsibility for the day-to-day running of the home on 28 January 2016. On the day of the monitoring visit he had not seen the organisations action plan to address the matters specified in the compliance notice. The action plan was being monitored by the organisations practice manager, who was present during the monitoring visit. There are some staff vacancies at the home. Currently there are sufficient numbers of staff to care for three residents and agency staff are employed to cover any

p.2

This monitoring visit

shortages. The home does not have sufficient numbers of permanent staff to meet the needs of young people in the event of a fourth young person being admitted. The majority of staff are experienced and either have a relevant qualification, or are working towards this. However, staff have not consistently kept their training updated. In particular, some staff have not completed or renewed their ‘Team Teach’ or restorative justice training. These two courses underpin the homes behaviour management approach. An impact assessment process has been introduced for the purpose of assessing the suitability of new admissions to the home. This process takes into account the likely impact a new admission will have on the current group. One young person has been admitted since the interim inspection and this new process was applied. There have been some improvements in gathering relevant information prior to offering a placement. This information has been used to inform the impact

p.2

This monitoring visit

assessment. However, the amount of information being collected remains insufficient and clarification is not being sought where questions remain. This has resulted in leaders and managers having a contradictory understanding of a young person’s child protection status. In addition, a young person’s bail conditions were not clarified prior to admission. Leaders and managers misunderstood a young person’s level of engagement with the youth offending service. Consequently, these issues have not been fully addressed in the impact assessment. The home has therefore failed to meet the requirement of the compliance notice in relation to obtaining all relevant information prior to admission. Evaluation is now taking place regarding the compatibility of new admissions with those already accommodated. This reduces the potential for poor group dynamics and young people being a risk to one another. However, practice can be further

p.2

This monitoring visit

developed in this area. Insufficient analysis was undertaken in respect of expressed vulnerabilities and the potential for young people to become involved in sexual exploitation. Leaders and managers undertook an evaluation of whether staff could meet the needs of the young person prior to admission. They concluded that overall, the organisations established training programme was sufficient to equip staff with the necessary knowledge and skills. Managers identified potential gaps in knowledge among the team and plan to address these in staff meetings and a practice development workshop. However, on the day of this monitoring visit it was not evident that leaders and managers have given sufficient consideration to when staff will update the training referred to earlier in this report. Effective planning has taken place in relation to how young people will be introduced to the home. This has included consultation with current residents. The

p.3

This monitoring visit

young person recently admitted stated that he was made to feel welcome and given information about routines and boundaries shortly after arriving. Records of key-working sessions confirm this to be the case. Effective action has been taken to meet two of the three steps outlined in the compliance notice, relating to Regulation 6 of The Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015. In order to ensure continued progress, two requirements are made as a result of this monitoring visit. Satisfactory progress has not been made in relation to gathering full information about a prospective admission.

p.3

Information about this children's home

The home caters for up to four young people who have emotional and behavioural difficulties. The home is privately owned.

p.4

Statutory Requirements

This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children's Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the Guide to the children's homes regulations including the quality standards. The registered person(s) must comply with the given timescales.

p.4

Requirement Due date

In order to meet the protection of children standard, with particular reference to evaluating risk, the registered person must ensure staff:

p.4

Requirement Due date

Regulation 12 (2) (a) (i) assess whether each child is at risk of harm, taking into account information in the child's relevant plans, and, if necessary, make arrangements to reduce the risk of any harm to the child 04/03/2016

p.4

Requirement Due date

Ensure that all employees undertake appropriate continuing professional development. Specifically, ensure staff complete refresher training in a timely manner ( Regulation 33 (4) (a)) 25/03/2016

p.4

Information about this inspection

The purpose of this visit was to monitor the action taken and the progress made by the home since their last Ofsted inspection. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000. the guidance raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted, which is available from Ofsted's website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Information about this inspection

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, workbased learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It inspects services for looked after children and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team,

p.6

Information about this inspection

The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

Information about this inspection

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.6

Information about this inspection

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion