Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)
Courtyard Preschool
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
9 Feb 2016
- Inspectors verified
Teresa Newman
- Early years verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Inadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
OX26 6DJ
- Name on report verified
Courtyard Preschool
- URN verified
EY425284
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsInadequate
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The progress check for children aged between two and three years is not completed in line with the requirements. p.1
- Important information regarding children's progress and emerging concerns are not being shared with parents. p.1
- Procedures for the induction of new staff are not rigorous enough. p.1
- The provider cannot show that new staff have received all the information required to fully understand their roles and responsibilities, such as the equality policy. p.1
- Leaders do not have a clear picture of how well all groups of children who attend the pre-school are progressing. p.1
- This means that any differences in attainment between groups of children, such as boys and girls, are not identified and addressed. p.1
- Arrangements for monitoring and developing staff's professional practice are not yet fully embedded or effective. p.1
- Staff build warm, nurturing relationships with children. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Safeguarding2
“Arrangements for safeguarding are effective.” p.3Wellbeing & mental health2
“Children are confident and show good levels of self-esteem.” p.3Records & policies2
“Procedures for the induction of new staff are not rigorous enough.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 791
- about usual (typical 773)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Courtyard Preschool Courtyard Youth Centre, Launton Road, Bicester, Oxfordshire, OX26 6DJ
p.1
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 9 February 2016 10 September 2015
p.1
3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement Outcomes for children Requires improvement
p.1
This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:
The progress check for children aged between two and three years is not completed in line with the requirements. Important information regarding children's progress and emerging concerns are not being shared with parents. Procedures for the induction of new staff are not rigorous enough. The provider cannot show that new staff have received all the information required to fully understand their roles and responsibilities, such as the equality policy. Leaders do not have a clear picture of how well all groups of children who attend the pre-school are progressing. This means that any differences in attainment between groups of children, such as boys and girls, are not identified and addressed. Arrangements for monitoring and developing staff's professional practice are not yet fully embedded or effective.
p.1
It has the following strengths
Staff build warm, nurturing relationships with children. As a result children demonstrate that they are happy confident and feel secure within the pre-school. Children are independent and make choices about where they want to play in the well- resourced indoor and outdoor areas.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
improve the arrangements for undertaking the progress check for children aged between two and three years so that it includes any areas where the child's progress is less than expected 08/03/2016
p.2
Due Date
ensure that a written summary of the children's progress check is shared with parents and other relevant professionals 08/03/2016
p.2
Due Date
introduce robust systems for the induction of new staff to ensure they are clear about their roles and responsibilities 22/03/2016
p.2
Due Date
improve the arrangements for monitoring children's progress to include how well different groups of children are achieving and identify and close any achievement gaps. 08/03/2016
p.2
Due Date
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
Due Date
embed the arrangements for supervision to secure the links between monitoring teaching, staff training and practice.
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector observed the quality of teaching and the impact on children's learning both indoors and outside. The inspector took into account the views of parents spoken to during the inspection. The inspector held a meeting with the manager to discuss how she drives improvement, monitors the quality of practice and supports the staff team. The inspector carried out a joint observation with the manager to assess the quality of teaching.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement
The manager has made some improvements to the pre-school and has an accurate of view of what needs to be done next. Arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Staff have a secure knowledge of child protection and know what to do if they have concerns in order to promote children's welfare. Induction and supervision arrangements for staff have been recently reviewed. However, these have yet to be implemented for all staff. Systems to observe and monitor the quality of teaching have also been introduced. However, these arrangements do not yet ensure that appropriate targeted training and professional development opportunities are identified. Staff have benefitted from some recent training, but the impact of the training on the quality of teaching is not yet monitored. For example, training in the use of puppets is not yet being used consistently well to promote children's interest in books and stories.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
Staff interact well with children. For example, they introduce new language and repeat words. This helps younger children in particular to develop their communication skills. They question children effectively to encourage them to express their ideas. Staff make good use of opportunities to promote and extend children's learning. For example, in the play shop children learn about number and the idea of needing a certain amount of coins to pay for their shopping. Staff know what older children can do and use this to help plan for the next steps in their learning. However, gaps in younger children's learning are not always clearly identified in the progress check. Consequently, appropriate intervention and support may not be accessed early enough.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare require improvement
Relationships with parents are positive overall. However, systems to share information with parents of younger children do not ensure they have a clear knowledge of how well their children are progressing or what their child needs to learn next. Children are confident and show good levels of self-esteem. They willingly take on roles within the pre- school such as preparing snacks, which helps with their independence. Children develop close bonds with key staff responsible for meeting their needs and this promotes their emotional wellbeing. Staff are caring and take an interest in what children have to say and do. New and younger children settle well into the routine because staff take time to get to know them and their families.
p.3
Outcomes for children require improvement
Children concentrate as they engage in activities and are generally absorbed in their play. They enjoy expressing their ideas as they explore paint on their hands and talk about the colours they have made. Overall children were observed to make steady progress, but systems to monitor this are new and not yet fully effective. Staff do not yet monitor how well groups are achieving to ensure that all children make as much progress as they possibly can and are ready for school.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number EY425284 Local authority Oxfordshire Inspection number 1034234 Type of provision Full-time provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register Age range of children 2 - 5 Total number of places 22 Number of children on roll 38 Name of provider Sarah Jayne Boucher Date of previous inspection 10 September 2015 Telephone number 07766913026
p.4
Setting details
Courtyard Preschool registered in 2011 under new private ownership. The pre-school has been on the current site in the Courtyard Youth Centre in Bicester, for over 40 years. The intake of children is from the local area and accommodation consists of a playroom and facilities within the centre. There is an enclosed garden for outdoor play. The pre-school is registered on the Early Years Register. There are currently 38 children on roll in the early years age range. The pre-school receives funding for the provision of free early education for children aged two, three and four years. It opens in school term times, on weekdays from 9.10am to 2.50pm. There is an optional lunch club and some children attend for the full day. Support is offered to children with special educational needs and/or disabilities. Staff currently support children for whom English is an additional language. The pre-school employs seven members of staff, six of whom hold appropriate early years qualifications.
p.4
Setting details
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the Early Years Foundation Stage.
p.4
Setting details
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
Setting details
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
Setting details
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.5
Setting details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion