Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)
Childminder in Rotherham
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
13 Jan 2016
- Inspectors verified
Ruth Moore
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Inadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Inadequate
- Name on report verified
Childminder Report
- URN verified
EY438655
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesInadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessmentInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Children's safety and well-being are compromised due to poor practice. p.3
- Poor assessment systems mean that any gaps in development are not identified and closed quickly enough. p.3
- However, her evaluation is not rigorous enough to identify and address any weaknesses in practice. p.3
- The childminder has a poor understanding of the safeguarding and welfare requirements. p.3
- Consequently, safeguarding is ineffective. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- ensure robust systems are in place to check that all adults being left unsupervised with children are suitable to carry out their role 13/02/2016 p.2
- complete regular and accurate assessments of children's development to identify any gaps in children's learning to ensure they make expected progress 13/02/2016 p.2
- ensure the written summary of the progress check is carried out for children between the ages of two and three years, and shared with parents. 13/02/2016 p.2
- improve self-evaluation to include information gathered from parents, in order to develop rigorous and highly effective plans for improvement. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Safeguarding3
“Safeguarding is inadequate.” p.1Wellbeing & mental health2
“Children's safety and well-being are compromised due to poor practice.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 722
- about usual (typical 886)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 13 January 2016 Not applicable
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4
p.1
This provision is inadequate
The childminder has not kept up to date with the requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage. Safeguarding is inadequate. The childminder does not have effective systems in place to ensure the suitability of adults being left unsupervised with children. The childminder does not know how to use assessment appropriately to robustly plan for the next steps in children's learning. The childminder is not aware of the requirement to carry out the required progress checks for children between the ages of two and three years. The childminder does not collect feedback from parents to evaluate her strengths and weaknesses, and improve the service she provides.
p.1
It has the following strengths
The childminder provides activities that children enjoy. The childminder promotes healthy lifestyles and provides children with a range of healthy food choices at snack time. The childminder has developed close relationships with children and parents. She collects information from parents about what their child is able to do and their interests at the start of the placement. Children demonstrate they feel emotionally secure in her care.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
ensure robust systems are in place to check that all adults being left unsupervised with children are suitable to carry out their role 13/02/2016
p.2
Due Date
complete regular and accurate assessments of children's development to identify any gaps in children's learning to ensure they make expected progress 13/02/2016
p.2
Due Date
ensure the written summary of the progress check is carried out for children between the ages of two and three years, and shared with parents. 13/02/2016
p.2
Due Date
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
Due Date
improve self-evaluation to include information gathered from parents, in order to develop rigorous and highly effective plans for improvement.
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities and assessed the impact this has on children's learning. The inspector looked at children's assessment records and the planning documentation. The inspector observed a planned activity and jointly evaluated this with the childminder. The inspector checked evidence of the suitability of all household members and the childminder's qualifications. She also looked at the childminder's self-evaluation form and discussed her improvement plan. The inspector asked the childminder questions about her practice at appropriate times throughout the inspection. The inspector took account of the written feedback from parents.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
The childminder has a poor understanding of the safeguarding and welfare requirements. She can describe how she would recognise the signs of possible abuse and neglect, and knows the procedures to follow if she is worried about a child's welfare. However, the childminder let an adult who is not vetted collect children from nursery. This means that suitability checks have not been completed to ensure the suitability for their role. Consequently, safeguarding is ineffective. Although the childminder does not collect feedback from parents she does evaluate her provision. However, her evaluation is not rigorous enough to identify and address any weaknesses in practice. This has an impact on children's welfare. The childminder has established links with other settings that children attend, in order to support continuity for their progress and care.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate
The childminder is qualified and has experience of childcare. She observes children as they play. However, the childminder does not know how to use assessment to accurately plan challenging experiences for individual children's learning needs . The childminder lacks knowledge of the learning and development requirements. She is not aware of the requirement to complete the progress checks for children between the ages of two and three years, and share the information with parents. Therefore, parents do not have a clear picture of their children's development. In addition, gaps in children's progress are not identified or addressed appropriately. The childminder follows children's interests and allows children to take the lead in their play. She attentively plays alongside children and promotes children's problem-solving skills. Children enjoy naming and counting animals when creating a winter snow activity on a farm. The childminder shares information with
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate
parents about the activities children have enjoyed and gives parents ideas for continuing children's learning at home.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
Children's safety and well-being are compromised due to poor practice. The setting is welcoming and has a broad range of play resources for children to select from. The childminder gives assistance as needed and praises children for their efforts. She has an understanding of how to manage children's behaviour. Children behave well and have respect for each other. They receive plenty of opportunities for outdoor activity. Children enjoy going on outings in the community. They have opportunities to increase their knowledge of a diverse society.
p.3
Outcomes for children are inadequate
Children do not make good enough progress. Poor assessment systems mean that any gaps in development are not identified and closed quickly enough. However, children are developing some of the basic skills they need to be prepared for their next stage of learning. Children are confident and motivated to play.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number EY438655 Local authority Rotherham Inspection number 956261 Type of provision Childminder Day care type Childminder Registers Early Years Register Age range of children 2 - 5 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 6
p.4
Name of provider
Date of previous inspection Not applicable
p.4
Telephone number
The childminder was registered in 2011 and lives in Rotherham. She operates all year round from 5am to 8pm, Monday to Friday, except for family holidays. The childminder holds an appropriate early years qualification at level 3.
p.4
Telephone number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the Early Years Foundation Stage.
p.4
Telephone number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
Telephone number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
Telephone number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.5
Telephone number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion