Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 26 Feb 2016

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Paul Cocker

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Paul Cocker

  • Postcode verified

    WF2 7DQ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−33Criticalmore positive than 10% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseswiftlyconfidentaccuraterigorousimproved
Criticisminadequateweakpoorgapsslow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings673w−43
  • What needs to improve165w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
826
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 26, typical 45
Average sentence
25 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 80%What needs to improve 20%

Full report text

24 February 2016 Mrs Christine Haines Service Manager Adult and Community Education and Skills Wakefield Metropolitan District Council Manygates Education Centre 24–26 Manygates Lane Sandal WF2 7DQ

p.1

Thank you for meeting with Gillian Reay, Senior HMI, and myself on 2 February 2016 at our visit to your training centre. We completed a scoping meeting to inform reinspection monitoring visits, following your inspection in November 2015. During discussions with you and your Service Director the following priorities were agreed:

p.1

 Improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment including English, mathematics and ESOL courses.  Improve the effectiveness of governance, leadership and improvement planning arrangements.  Improve performance management and professional development arrangements.  Raise the achievement of learners from African, Pakistani and other Asian backgrounds to at least that of their peers.  Improve the design and management of the 16–19 study programme.  Improve the adult learning curriculum to ensure that it aligns more closely with the local employment and skills priorities.  Improve the data management systems to allow managers to identify and improve underperformance within the provision.

p.1

Actions taken to date and their impact:

Following your inspection in November 2015, and the resulting inadequate grade for overall effectiveness, you acknowledge that the service was experiencing a period of significant change due to previous leadership and governance being weak. You and your managers have since taken swift and decisive action to eliminate poor provision and to improve the performance and accountability of all staff. You have implemented a post-inspection action plan which you are diligently monitoring, and you are making improvements, including the appointment of a governing body and aligning the curriculum to local employment and skills priorities. Ofsted

p.1

Actions taken to date and their impact:

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted Managers are in the process of modifying a new process of the observation of teaching, learning and assessment which has an increased focus on the learning acquired by students as opposed to the quality of teaching. In addition, you have implemented a detailed individual action plan following observations to ensure that areas of development are swiftly acted upon, to improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment, and ultimately learners’ outcomes.

p.1

Actions taken to date and their impact:

Managers are in the final stages of appointing an experienced governing body to ensure that there is sufficient strategic oversight of the provision and to provide the necessary challenge to senior managers to improve the provision rapidly. You and your director are confident of this governing body being in place by the end of February 2016 to provide an equal measure of support and challenge to improve the quality of provision.

p.2

Actions taken to date and their impact:

Managers are acutely aware of the need to have access to accurate data on the performance of learners and their continuing progress while on their programme. You and your managers have implemented more rigorous systems to identify any gaps between the achievements of different groups of learners, and employed action plans to narrow these achievement gaps. You have recently improved your data reporting to include retention, achievement and success measures for a range of learners to identify the effectiveness of the provision in meeting learners’ attainment goals. However, more emphasis needs to be placed on the progress that learners are making in relation to their starting points. Currently no senior management oversight of this key performance measurement exists, which prevents you and your managers from intervening when progress is slow.

p.2

Actions taken to date and their impact:

Managers do not provide sufficient emphasis on monitoring the formative progress that learners make in their studies, and they do not use the results of the observations of teaching, learning and assessment to identify specific targets for the member of staff to improve. Managers do not use performance management documents to good enough effect to prioritise these two areas.

p.2

Actions taken to date and their impact:

You and your managers have had extensive meetings with the Education Funding Agency in relation to the small number of learners following the 16–19 study programme, and have agreed not to enrol any more learners onto the programme. Transitional arrangements have been put in place to allow you to support the few remaining learners to achieve their qualifications.

p.2

Agreed next steps

During our discussion we agreed the following:

p.3

Agreed next steps

 ensure a monthly data report is produced and rigorously monitored throughout the organisation, including by governors; review the key data that you need to include to provide an accurate picture of performance including the progress that learners are making in relation to their starting points

p.3

Agreed next steps

 ensure that a governing body is established by the end of February 2016 to scrutinise performance of the service and execute proportionate challenge to improve the provision rapidly

p.3

Agreed next steps

 ensure that the key focus of observers’ activity is on students’ learning and progress development as opposed to tutor performance; and where areas for improvement are identified, these are swiftly acted upon and monitored meticulously

p.3

Agreed next steps

 ensure that the performance of tutors is monitored routinely and frequently and that interventions are rapidly put into place where necessary.

p.3

Agreed next steps

Thank you for your hospitality at our initial meeting and I look forward to working with you and your team at subsequent reinspection monitoring visits.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion