Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Postcode verified
RH15 8HZ
- Name on report verified
West Sussex County Council
- URN verified
10579
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- As part of the agenda to protect learners from the potential risks of radicalisation and extremism, help teachers to know and understand their learners well. p.2
- Develop effective procedures to gather information about Monitoring visit: West Sussex County Council 29 January 2016 learners’ specific problems which prevent learning, individual support needs and personal circumstances. p.2
- Ensure that the programme of mandatory safeguarding and ‘Prevent’ training is completed by all staff and comprehensive records of attendance and dates of training are kept. p.2
- Managers must ensure that comprehensive records of all actions and outcomes relating to safeguarding incidents are comprehensively recorded, and that records show clearly which incidents have been resolved successfully. p.3
- Incidents should be scrutinised and analysed systematically by WSCC senior managers to identify any trends. p.3
- WSCC managers should rapidly ensure that comprehensive and effective arrangements are in place to ensure learners’ safety continues to be a priority. p.3
- Managers’ and teachers’ completion of community venue risk assessments were weak at the previous inspection and a few venues were not sufficiently secure. p.3
- WSCC senior managers have a clear responsibility to ensure that venues used by ASL to deliver community and family learning are secure and safe. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes12
“Actions are not always clear and outcomes lack sufficient detail.” p.3Leadership & governance7
“At the previous inspection, governance by WSCC was reported as weak.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 1,526
- longer than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Very hard
- Flesch 29, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
West Sussex County Council First reinspection monitoring visit report
p.1
Address:
Aspire Sussex Marle Place Leylands Road West Sussex RH15 8HZ
p.1
Address:
Publication date: 17 February 2016 Inspection number: 10010579 Monitoring visit: West Sussex County Council 29 January 2016
p.1
Context and focus of visit
This is the first reinspection monitoring visit to West Sussex County Council following publication of the inspection report on 16 December 2015 which found the provider to be inadequate overall.
p.2
Context and focus of visit
West Sussex County Council (WSCC) contracts directly with the Skills Funding Agency (SFA) to provide both accredited and non-accredited learning for adults and young people aged 16 to 18. The council subcontracts delivery of the whole provision to Aspire Sussex Limited (ASL), a charitable not-for-profit organisation. Learning centres are sited in key areas of need including Burgess Hill, Bognor Regis, Littlehampton, Southwick and Crawley.
p.2
Context and focus of visit
The purpose of this visit was to establish what initial steps managers have taken to improve provision, in response to the previous inspection, and to set key priorities for the next visit.
p.2
Ensure that appropriate safeguarding checks are made and recorded for all
teachers, volunteers and learning support assistants needing them.
p.2
Provide all staff with appropriate safeguarding training including on the
At the previous inspection, WSCC had not suitably checked the backgrounds of all teaching staff to ensure that all learners were safe, and in particular those aged 16 to 18 or learners with disabilities and those with learning difficulties. At this visit WSCC had a record of background checks, including criminal records checks where appropriate, on all teaching staff for adults with learning difficulties and disabilities (ALDD) and those involved in the provision of community learning. However, records were not complete for all ASL teaching and administrative staff.
p.2
Provide all staff with appropriate safeguarding training including on the
Managers have made good progress in introducing systems and training for staff to ensure learners are not at risk of radicalisation or extremism, but this work is at an early stage and it is too soon to judge whether these actions have made an impact. WSCC keep a record of staff who have received safeguarding training. However, managers do not ensure that the training records include all volunteers, learning support assistants and members of the ASL board of trustees.
p.2
Priorities for improvement
As part of the agenda to protect learners from the potential risks of radicalisation and extremism, help teachers to know and understand their learners well. Develop effective procedures to gather information about Monitoring visit: West Sussex County Council 29 January 2016 learners’ specific problems which prevent learning, individual support needs and personal circumstances. Ensure that the programme of mandatory safeguarding and ‘Prevent’ training is completed by all staff and comprehensive records of attendance and dates of training are kept.
p.2
actions taken and outcomes, are maintained, scrutinised by senior
managers and escalated to relevant authorities where appropriate.
p.3
actions taken and outcomes, are maintained, scrutinised by senior
At the previous inspection managers’ records of safeguarding incidents were judged to be weak. They did not record the actions taken, or dates and people concerned in sufficient detail. At this visit it was apparent that WSCC managers had done little to remedy this weakness. It is important that issues raised are resolved appropriately.
p.3
actions taken and outcomes, are maintained, scrutinised by senior
Aspire staff maintain a safeguarding log which contains brief details of incidents. Actions are not always clear and outcomes lack sufficient detail. Records were confusing as several of the entries examined by inspectors contained reference to ongoing reviews but had been recorded as completed. Inspectors were not assured that incidents, actions and outcomes were monitored sufficiently by WSCC senior managers.
p.3
Priorities for improvement
Managers must ensure that comprehensive records of all actions and outcomes relating to safeguarding incidents are comprehensively recorded, and that records show clearly which incidents have been resolved successfully. Incidents should be scrutinised and analysed systematically by WSCC senior managers to identify any trends. WSCC managers should rapidly ensure that comprehensive and effective arrangements are in place to ensure learners’ safety continues to be a priority.
p.3
assessments of community venues are carried out and a safe environment
Managers’ and teachers’ completion of community venue risk assessments were weak at the previous inspection and a few venues were not sufficiently secure. WSCC senior managers have a clear responsibility to ensure that venues used by ASL to deliver community and family learning are secure and safe.
p.3
assessments of community venues are carried out and a safe environment
Security at some community venues remains poor and any member of the public can enter these buildings with no security checks. In a few venues visited by inspectors, space is provided for vulnerable older learners but rooms have no windows or vision panels, no bells to alert the teacher of a visitor, no locked doors and no signing in record to meet fire safety requirements. A few teachers had not completed risk assessments for subjects requiring technical skills and tools that necessitate Monitoring visit: West Sussex County Council 29 January 2016 adherence to safe working practices. No risk assessments were completed for individual learners who may have more challenging physical barriers to learning.
p.3
assessments of community venues are carried out and a safe environment
Learners receive sensitive and careful consideration of their health and safety from teachers, with good individual attention given to learners in physical fitness classes who have specific joint or posture complaints. Learners report an awareness of their health needs and pain thresholds, and teachers adapt tasks to suit individual needs well. Poor heating at some venues is uncomfortable for a minority of learners.
p.4
Priorities for improvement
Develop an appropriate policy and a protocol for risk assessment that set out clearly expectations, timescales and review dates. Develop a more robust and detailed risk assessment process for the adult education and community venues used. Ensure that risk assessments and factors that mitigate against identified risks are comprehensively recorded. Ensure that, where appropriate, teachers carry out a risk assessment for individual learners who have specific disabilities/and or learning difficulties, including any risks to other vulnerable learners.
p.4
analyse data more incisively, to measure the impact of actions being taken
At the previous inspection, governance by WSCC was reported as weak. As a result, governors had not effectively challenged leaders’ decisions, for example on the programmes ASL offered to learners aged 16 to 18.
p.4
analyse data more incisively, to measure the impact of actions being taken
WSCC senior managers are represented on the ASL board of trustees. However, WSCC, as the SFA main contractor, continues to take insufficient responsibility for managing the contract. Aspire is the main contributor to the self-assessment and quality improvement planning processes; WSCC senior managers do not sufficiently oversee and manage the process. The WSCC contract management team have good management information systems in place to record progress against key performance indicators, such as learners’ achievements, retention and participation rates. Regular meetings with ASL managers ensure that this level of detail is maintained accurately to meet funding requirements. However, WSCC managers do not interrogate the data sufficiently to monitor achievements by different groups of learners and are therefore unable to pinpoint areas for improvement.
p.4
analyse data more incisively, to measure the impact of actions being taken
Aspire uses a wide range of activities and events to gather information from learners including surveys, compliment boxes, a ‘wish tree’ and focus groups to gain the views of learners and enable them to influence the development of provision. WSCC managers do not routinely check the effectiveness of such activities as a useful tool to improve provision. ‘You said, we did’ posters are displayed at venues to inform learners of the results of their feedback, and termly satisfaction surveys are generally Monitoring visit: West Sussex County Council 29 January 2016 very positive. The needs of the community are carefully considered in the development of courses, including provision for vulnerable groups and minority ethnic learners, but any complaints received are not routinely viewed by WSCC managers or analysed to identify risks.
p.4
Priorities for improvement
Ensure that representatives on the board of trustees are provided with clear and accurate information and challenge fully all aspects of the provision of learning. WSCC contract managers should use the information to inform an evaluative self-assessment and effective quality improvement plan. Improve the monitoring of contracts and provision including analysis of learners’ retention and achievements by subject, level and group. Ensure that differences in participation and achievement between groups of learners are clearly identified, and plans put in place to close gaps and increase achievements. Oversee ASL’s decision-making processes regarding the development of, and improvement to, provision more effectively, including the analysis of complaints.
p.5
speakers of other languages (ESOL)
In the previous year, managers took suitable action to improve the quality of teaching in English, English for speakers of other languages (ESOL) and mathematics, but it was too early to judge whether this had improved learners’ achievement of qualifications, which was not good enough at the time of the previous inspection.
p.5
speakers of other languages (ESOL)
Current learners are more likely to stay on their courses; for example, retention rates in English and mathematics have much improved in both subjects. Subject leaders are carefully monitoring withdrawal rates and analysing reasons why learners withdraw, in order to identify root causes and any trends within classes or with specific teachers. Support for learners who have a learning difficulty or disability is well established; staff conduct specialist assessments to identify the need for learning support assistance, including one-to-one support from volunteers.
p.5
Priorities for improvement
Continue the detailed analysis of withdrawals, learning support, success and progression data to ensure the reasons for withdrawal and success or progression are known and understood, and remedial actions taken. Continue to work on embedding English, mathematics and ESOL skills development into vocational and leisure learning courses to ensure life and employability skills are maximised. Monitoring visit: West Sussex County Council 29 January 2016 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after
p.5
Priorities for improvement
children, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231 or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk . Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn . Ofsted
p.6
Priorities for improvement
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion