Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Gable Hall School

Inspected 12 Jan 2016 · published 29 Jan 2016 · URN 115355

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

John Daniell

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    12 Jan 2016

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Daniell

  • Postcode verified

    SS17 8JT

  • Name on report verified

    Gable Hall School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+9Mostly positivemore positive than 40% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositiveeffectivevery wellconsistentlystrongmake good progresseffectivelypositively
Criticismdisruptivepoorunacceptableat riskbreachbelowweakerlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1238w+15
  • What needs to improve86w−33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,317
about usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 47
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
2
typical 8
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 91%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Dr S Asong Headteacher Gable Hall School Southend Road Stanford le Hope Essex SS17 8JT

p.1

No formal designation monitoring inspection of Gable Hall School

Following my visit to your academy on 12 January 2016, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and the time you took to discuss behaviour in your academy.

p.1

No formal designation monitoring inspection of Gable Hall School

The inspection was a monitoring inspection carried out in accordance with the no formal designation procedures and conducted under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was carried out because Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector was concerned about behaviour at the academy.

p.1

Evidence

The inspector considered evidence including:

p.1

Evidence

 observations of pupils’ behaviour and their attitudes to learning in lessons  observations of pupils’ behaviour throughout the day, including discussion with pupils  documentary evidence  discussions with academy leaders and staff.

p.1

Evidence

Having evaluated all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Evidence

Leaders and managers have taken effective action to maintain the high standards of behaviour and attitudes identified at the academy’s previous inspection.

p.1

Context

This secondary school is much larger than average. The proportion of pupils from minority ethnic groups is well below average, as is the proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language. The proportion of pupils who have disabilities or special educational needs, including those who have a statement of special educational needs or an education, health and care (EHC) plan, is broadly average. The proportion of pupils who leave the academy during the school year is low, and there was a 15% staff turnover in 2015, which was below the national average. The academy has difficulty in recruiting staff, particularly in science and mathematics.

p.2

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

Pupils arrive at the academy sensibly and are routinely greeted by members of staff at the entrance every morning. Pupils also leave the academy sensibly and are well supervised by members of staff. I observed pupils waiting patiently at the bus stops after school. Letters of praise from members of the public received by the academy also indicate that the vast majority of pupils behave very well when they are taking part in excursions.

p.2

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

Pupils are aware of the consequences of being late and both your attendance officer and the recently appointed home-school liaison officer have worked effectively to ensure that pupils’ attendance as a whole is above the national average. However, pupils eligible for pupil premium funding and those who have an EHC plan attend less well than their peers.

p.2

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

Good staff presence around the academy ensures that pupils move around in an orderly fashion, although the canteen is prone to becoming crowded at breaktime, particularly during colder weather and when pupils prefer to remain indoors. I observed pupils socialising with each other well when seated, and staff interacting positively with pupils when they queued to purchase their food. Pupils typically show respect for their academy environment. There was no evidence of graffiti around the building, including in the pupils’ toilets, although I observed a few pupils drop small amounts of litter at the end of their morning break.

p.2

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

Pupils’ attitudes in lessons remain positive when the teaching engages their interest. I observed all groups of pupils engage in their learning in the majority of lessons I visited, and they were encouraged to re-engage by teachers and teaching assistants when their concentration was at risk of waning. Pupils told me that there are still some incidents of low-level disruptive behaviour which at times act as a barrier to learning. These include losing concentration, talking when the teacher is talking or slouching over the desk.

p.2

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

You are aware of this low-level disruptive behaviour and have rightly identified that it is linked to the quality of teaching and you know when it is likely to occur. By supporting the identified teachers and closely monitoring the behaviour of particular classes, you have identified trends and deployed suitable strategies to reduce such incidents. Your behaviour policy contains useful appendices which help teachers to identify what constitutes unacceptable behaviour and provide them with guidance on how to prevent poor behaviour from featuring in their lessons. Your own surveys of parents’ views indicate that the majority of those who respond are satisfied with the academy’s actions to ensure that pupils are well behaved.

p.2

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

You closely monitor the numbers of incidents relating to behaviour, including homophobic bullying and racist behaviour. In their discussions with me, pupils had strong views about the importance of tolerance and equality. I witnessed pupils from minority ethnic groups mixing well with the White British majority of pupils. Although bullying exists, pupils told me that they are clear about how to go about reporting this. Some feel that the matters raised could be resolved more quickly, although others were positive about the academy’s actions to rectify the matter. Pupils are taught well about how to keep themselves safe, particularly when using the internet. You also reward pupils for behaving well and being good role models to others. Your behaviour card system, which requires every pupil to carry the card and place it on the desk at the start of the lesson, is welcomed by the majority. This leads to

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

rewards for showing respect and integrity, and has helped to raise the expectations that teachers have of pupils and that pupils have of themselves.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

Regular meetings between key members of staff ensure that behaviour and attendance remain at the top of the agenda. Your systems for recording behavioural incidents ensure that appropriate support and intervention are put in place. You report to the governing body regularly on matters relating to behaviour and attendance through your detailed headteacher’s report. You also make effective use of this information to inform your self-evaluation summary of the academy’s overall effectiveness. You have reviewed the way you record behavioural incidents from September 2015 in order to make them tighter. You have also raised your expectations about what constitutes acceptable behaviour and pupils now know that their actions will have consequences. Consequently, figures indicate that recorded incidents have increased, as is to be expected in response to the more stringent approach. However, this is now stabilising and pupils are clear about what is and is

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

not acceptable both inside and outside of the classroom. The academy has strict rules about uniform and behaviour. Although pupils comment that the academy has become more rigorous in the implementation of its behaviour code, they understand why and see the longer-term benefits. Some pupils report that not all teachers implement the classroom sanctions system consistently and feel that this is unfair.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

Your systems for keeping pupils safe in school are well established and systematic. You maintain the single central record of recruitment checks of staff well and check its compliance on a monthly basis.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

Pupils in Years 9, 10 and 11 who attend off-site provision attend regularly, and have positive attitudes towards their learning. The majority make good progress. The isolation rooms are used appropriately when pupils are in breach of the academy rules. Academy leaders act quickly when a pupil breaks the rules, and pupils are provided with time to reflect on their actions before being reintegrated into lessons. Pupils with previously challenging behaviour who met with me were positive about the academy’s actions in helping them to rectify their poor behaviour. While some still have anger management problems, they told me that their behaviour has certainly improved and that they find the mentoring provided by the local chaplaincy particularly helpful. Permanent exclusions are almost non-existent, and the proportion of pupils who are excluded for fixed periods of time is well below the national average.

p.3

Priorities for further improvement

 tackle the small amount of low-level disruptive behaviour which features in lessons where teaching is weaker

p.4

Priorities for further improvement

 ensure that all teachers implement the classroom code of conduct consistently

p.4

Priorities for further improvement

 improve the attendance of pupils eligible for the pupil premium and those who have an EHC plan.

p.4

Priorities for further improvement

I am copying this letter to the Director of Children’s Services for Thurrock, the Secretary of State for Education, the Chair of the Governing Body and the Education Funding Agency. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion