Schools & FE · Short school inspection
Steep Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
8 Dec 2015
- Inspectorssingle source
Louise Adams
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
GU32 2DE
- Name on report verified
Steep Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2011.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Children in the early years have settled very well and are making good progress. p.3
- Pupils are adamant that they are very well cared for and very safe. p.2
- Standards in writing and mathematics are also rising, although pupils need more opportunities to practise their skills to secure equally rapid progress in these subjects. p.3
- Relationships between pupils and teachers are positive and respectful. p.1
- Governors and leaders know the school very well. p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment19
“Relationships between pupils and teachers are positive and respectful.” p.1Leadership & governance16
“Governors and leaders know the school very well.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,356
- about usual (typical 1483)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Mrs L Romans Headteacher Steep Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School Church Road Steep Petersfield Hampshire GU32 2DE
p.1
School
Following my visit to the school on 8 December 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in February 2011.
p.1
School
The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. Since taking up the permanent position of headteacher immediately after the previous inspection, you have maintained and built on the school’s previous strengths. Your positive and determined leadership is recognised and appreciated by staff and parents. The close-knit family atmosphere you have cultivated is apparent in relationships at all levels.
p.1
School
Parents consider themselves to be fortunate to be part of the school community and speak very positively of the ‘open-door’ approach demonstrated by all staff in the school. Parents are rightly very pleased with the education and care provided, and say their children are very happy.
p.1
School
Relationships between pupils and teachers are positive and respectful. Pupils enjoy coming to school and are appreciative of teachers’ careful planning to make learning fun. Pupils are motivated to learn and work hard in lessons. They demonstrate confidence and independence, sharing their ideas and asking questions when they are not sure. Governors and leaders know the school very well. Leaders check teaching and learning regularly and make sure that teachers know how well they are doing and what they need to do to improve. Governors are well informed because they carry out their own checks to see for themselves what is going well, and what could be even better. However, leaders and governors could be even more aspirational for the school by setting more challenging targets for pupils and teachers.
p.1
School
Behaviour in lessons is good and often very good. The conduct of pupils during the collective worship, led by the vicar, was a pleasure to observe. There were, however, a few occasions outside lessons and at playtime when pupils did not manage their behaviour quite as well.
p.2
School
Since the previous inspection there have been changes to the teaching team. This has led to some variability in the progress pupils made in the recent past, which was evident in the end of key stage test results in 2014. Where teaching was weaker, you took decisive action. As a result, teaching is good again. This was reflected in the improvements in 2015 results. However, you recognise that achievement is still not quite as good as it could be in mathematics and writing.
p.2
School
Pupils with special educational needs are taught very well. Teaching is carefully tailored to meet their specific learning, social and personal needs, so that these pupils make good or very good progress. Pupils who are eligible for the pupil premium (government funding for disadvantaged pupils) catch up by the time they leave the school. This is because teachers check their progress regularly and, if the gap is not closing, make sure that extra support is put in place.
p.2
School
Since the last inspection, you have taken appropriate action to address the areas identified as needing improvement. Teachers now organise lessons well so pupils have plenty of time to work and are clear what they need to do to be successful. Most-able pupils are provided with extra work, although it is not always challenging enough to extend pupils’ thinking and learning.
p.2
School
Grammar, punctuation and spelling, which were also identified at the previous inspection as being areas for improvement, are now taught well. Pupils use these skills effectively in their writing and in other subjects. However, in some classes pupils do not have enough opportunities to write longer pieces of work, so they are not getting enough opportunities to practise their skills.
p.2
School
The leadership team has ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose and records are appropriately detailed. Policies are reviewed regularly to ensure that they are up to date and staff receive regular training which ensures that they are confident about their responsibilities in keeping pupils safe. Governors and leaders carry out a rigorous audit of safeguarding procedures and documentation annually, from which they identify any ways in which arrangements can be improved even further. Parents are rightly confident in the school’s work to care for pupils and ensure that they are safe. Pupils are adamant that they are very well cared for and very safe. They learn about road and fire safety, stranger danger and internet safety. Pupils also learn about managing risk through their Forest School lessons.
p.2
Inspection findings
You and other leaders, including governors, have a good understanding of the school’s strengths and areas that need further improvement. You know exactly what actions you need to take. Governors carry out a rigorous programme of monitoring the school’s work. They understand their role well and hold you to account by asking you to provide a range of information about pupils’ achievement. You have rightly restructured the leadership team so that the school is not dependent upon all improvements being driven by you. The deputy headteacher provides effective support in checking learning and improving teaching. The recent appointment of leaders for English and mathematics is positive but they are very new in post. Training is being provided by the local authority to ensure that they have the necessary skills to carry out their roles. You work effectively with a group of local schools to challenge each other
p.3
Inspection findings
and share good practice. The new method of assessment, which is being developed with other schools, is helping teachers to be clear about how to show progress in learning. Achievement in reading is improving swiftly, because you have strengthened teaching. It was delightful to see Year 6 pupils working confidently on the text of Romeo and Juliet, making suggestions as to how Romeo might have felt at each stage of the story. Standards in writing and mathematics are also rising, although pupils need more opportunities to practise their skills to secure equally rapid progress in these subjects. Children in the early years have settled very well and are making good progress. Effective two-way communication between home and school supports their learning well. Children work with purpose, demonstrating very good skills and independence. I observed four boys working in ‘Santa’s grotto’ to wrap presents. They were adept at cutting sticky tape (without
p.3
Inspection findings
tangling it) and wrote appropriate labels, working cooperatively alongside each other, sharing paper and scissors, to each complete their own tasks. Pupils reflect effectively on their learning. They feed back whether they understand the activity and how useful they found it. This is encouraged from an early age, and developed to a sophisticated level as pupils move up through the school. Teachers respond to pupils’ comments and assess their learning effectively. The local authority provides useful support. The lead learning partner provides accurate and helpful reports which confirm the school’s priorities and offer challenge to improve further. The subject leader training for the newly appointed leaders is at an early stage but is set to continue next year. You set relevant targets for teachers, which sensibly link to pupils’ progress. However, the targets are not always aspirational enough. Governors’
p.3
Inspection findings
involvement in performance management is robust. They check the targets set and review whether they have been achieved in order to make decisions about pay. They have rigorous discussions which ensure that teachers and leaders are held to account.
p.4
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should:
p.4
Next steps for the school
further raise expectations of what can be achieved, by setting more aspirational targets for pupils and teachers improve achievement further in writing and mathematics, ensuring that pupils across the school have opportunities to practise their skills ensure that all pupils manage their behaviour well, especially outside lessons.
p.4
Next steps for the school
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Education for the Diocese of Portsmouth (CE) and the Director of Children’s Services for Hampshire County Council. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.4
Information about the inspection
I met with you, the deputy headteacher, teachers, pupils and four governors, including the Chair of the Governing Body. I spoke to a representative from Hampshire local authority by telephone. With you, I observed teaching in each class and we were joined by the deputy headteacher to scrutinise pupils’ books. I observed pupils’ behaviour at break time and around the school. I spoke to a number of parents at the beginning of the school day and considered the responses of 24 parents to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View. I analysed a range of documentation, including the school’s self-evaluation, school improvement plan, information about pupils’ progress and safeguarding checks, policies and procedures. I also took into account six responses to the staff questionnaire.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion