Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 7 Jan 2016

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

John Mitcheson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Mitcheson

  • Postcode verified

    PE27 6RR

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−36Criticalmore positive than 9% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedstrengthsclearlysecure
Criticismgapsweaknessesnot yetpersistent absencelowerlownot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings764w−24
  • What needs to improve197w−50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
960
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 80%What needs to improve 20%

Full report text

Mr Sam Griffin Headteacher St Ivo School High Leys St Ives Cambridgeshire PE27 6RR

p.1

No formal designation monitoring inspection of St Ivo School

Following my visit to your academy on 1 December 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings.

p.1

No formal designation monitoring inspection of St Ivo School

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for inspecting schools with no formal designation. The inspection was carried out because Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector was concerned about the achievement of disadvantaged pupils.

p.1

Evidence

I met with you and your team of senior leaders, a group of pupils and two members of the governing body. I also scrutinised a range of documents relating to the achievement of disadvantaged pupils.

p.1

Context

Since the last monitoring inspection, you have taken up your substantive role as headteacher. There have been very few changes to staffing. The number of pupils on roll remains the same as last year. This year, 270 pupils throughout Years 7 to 13 are eligible for the pupil premium (extra government funding to support those from disadvantaged backgrounds).

p.1

Context

Last year, pupil premium funding made little difference to narrowing the gap in achievement. Some of the strategies used to raise the achievement of disadvantaged pupils did not work. Data show that their achievement remained lower than that of other pupils in the academy. By the end of Key Stage 4, gaps in the attainment and progress of pupils actually widened. Ofsted

p.1

Context

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk The impact of better teaching, promoted through regular monitoring, evaluation and training, is clearly shown in the academy’s improved results this year. You have reaffirmed with teachers the importance of maintaining this so that all pupils, including those from disadvantaged backgrounds, make the progress expected of them.

p.1

Context

Despite this year’s improved results, closing the achievement gap between disadvantaged pupils and others remains a pressing issue as the academy prepares for its reinspection in 2016. Rightly, you have made raising the achievement of disadvantaged pupils the academy’s top priority. You are continuing with strategies known to be making a difference in supporting disadvantaged pupils, and have introduced new ones to secure sustainable gains at a faster rate.

p.2

disadvantaged pupils effectively to achieve their potential are that:

 your evaluation of what did and did not work well last year has informed your current plan for narrowing the gap in pupils’ achievement by the end of Key Stage 4

p.2

disadvantaged pupils effectively to achieve their potential are that:

 all teachers receive updates of pupils’ most recent progress data, which highlights those who are not meeting the minimum target grades set for them, including disadvantaged pupils

p.2

disadvantaged pupils effectively to achieve their potential are that:

 increasingly, all teachers are held accountable for raising the achievement of disadvantaged pupils. The academy’s appraisal procedures now include a target whereby all teaching staff select up to five disadvantaged pupils in their classes and identify key actions that they will take to accelerate their progress and raise their achievement

p.2

disadvantaged pupils effectively to achieve their potential are that:

 pupils in Year 11 have mentors to oversee their progress and welfare, and to steer them towards extra teaching and revision classes, including an additional ‘period 6’ at the end of each day

p.2

disadvantaged pupils effectively to achieve their potential are that:

 an additional hour of English and mathematics has been added to the curriculum for all pupils in Years 8 to 11. Each subject has an extra teacher to teach small groups of pupils and provide one-to-one support for them  disadvantaged pupils who join the academy in Year 7 with low levels of literacy and numeracy receive intensive teaching and support together in the same small class, through the ‘7-Jump programme’. Pupils who were part of this last year spoke enthusiastically with me about the impact it has had on their learning, confidence and self-esteem. You are continuing with it this year and have extended it into Year 8 for those who need further support in acquiring basic skills.

p.2

disadvantaged pupils effectively to achieve their potential are that:

 as the academy nears its reinspection in 2016, current performance data show that support for disadvantaged pupils has not worked well enough, and that these pupils continue to underachieve compared to others in the academy

p.3

disadvantaged pupils effectively to achieve their potential are that:

 some new strategies, implemented this year to narrow gaps in achievement, are not yet sufficiently embedded to prove that they are leading to improvement

p.3

disadvantaged pupils effectively to achieve their potential are that:

 some mentors and pastoral staff are not monitoring closely the attendance of some disadvantaged pupils, or following up their persistent absence with sufficient rigour. Records show that some are often absent from school

p.3

disadvantaged pupils effectively to achieve their potential are that:

 the actions the academy is taking to ensure that disadvantaged learners in the sixth form achieve well are not as clear as for those in earlier key stages.

p.3

Priorities for further improvement

 Evaluate at regular intervals the impact of the actions you are taking to narrow the gaps in achievement and record this fully to illustrate the academy’s effectiveness in raising the achievement of disadvantaged pupils.

p.3

Priorities for further improvement

 Increase the attendance of disadvantaged pupils.

p.3

Priorities for further improvement

 Ensure that disadvantaged learners in the sixth form receive the support they need to reach the standards they should.

p.3

External support

You have spent your first term finding out the academy’s strengths and weaknesses, and wasted no time in forging new relationships with local schools. You have visited all of the academy’s primary partner schools to gain a full picture of pupils’ learning prior to their arrival in Year 7, and to discuss how schools can work more collaboratively. You and your governors value the initial work developed through Ofsted’s ‘Triads’ initiative, and are now seeking to forge a firm partnership with a local secondary school.

p.4

External support

The academy continues to employ the services of an external consultant to support its monitoring and evaluation procedures.

p.4

External support

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State for Education, the Chair of the Governing Body and the Education Funding Agency. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion