Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)

Childminder in Hampshire

Inspected 15 Sept 2015 · published 7 Oct 2015 · URN EY408741

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Melissa Cox

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    15 Sept 2015

  • Inspectors verified

    Melissa Cox

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Outcomes verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Inadequate

  • Name on report verified

    Childminder Report

  • URN verified

    EY408741

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • OutcomesInadequate
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentInadequate

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−24Mixedmore positive than 73% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelymake good progresspositivelyenjoytimelyrobustweaknesseffective
Criticismweaknessesweaknot effectivelynot alwaysconcernsfalling behindnot sufficientlylimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings613w−50
  • Leadership107w−26
  • What needs to improve271w+29

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
979
about usual (typical 886)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 47
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
5
typical 7
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 42%Leadership 7%What needs to improve 19%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 15 September 2015 13 December 2010

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4

p.1

This provision is inadequate

 The childminder does not match teaching to children's abilities. She does not provide a varied enough range of activities that build on children's interests, stimulate their curiosity or capture their imagination. The childminder does not use assessments to inform targets for learning or secure necessary interventions. As a result, children do not always enjoy their learning or progress well.  The childminder does not actively promote equality and diversity in learning. Children with additional needs do not have equal chances to take part in activities or receive the same level of support as other children. They do not develop in key areas, such as communication and language. This has an impact on the key skills they need for school.  Children do not have the space to make their own decisions, share their thoughts or gain confidence in themselves. The childminder does not manage children's behaviour

p.1

This provision is inadequate

positively and they have few chances to foster their independence. This does not promote children's self-esteem or emotional well-being.  The childminder has limited knowledge and understanding of working with parents. The information she passes on to parents does not give a clear enough picture of how children are progressing. The childminder has not established partnerships with professionals to help children access the support they need to reach their full potential.

p.1

It has the following strengths

 The childminder demonstrates a sound knowledge of her responsibility to protect children in her care. She is aware of the signs and symptoms of abuse and knows whom to contact if she has concerns about a child's welfare.  Children take part in regular outings to local community groups and parks. As a result, children are physically active and experience plenty of fresh air.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To meet the requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage and the Childcare Register the provider must:

p.2

Due Date

 improve the educational programmes for communication and language, and children's personal, social and emotional development so they gain the skills they need in readiness for their move to nursery or school 27/10/2015

p.2

Due Date

 ensure assessment information is used effectively to plan appropriate teaching and learning strategies, including to identify children who are falling behind in their learning or who need additional support, enabling all children to make good progress, achieve well and enjoy their learning 27/10/2015

p.2

Due Date

 ensure that the progress check at age two is used effectively to share any areas where the child's progress is less than expected and to work in partnership with parents and other professionals to identify and support a targeted and timely plan to support the child's future learning and development 27/10/2015

p.2

Due Date

 implement robust systems for monitoring the educational programmes to ensure that any variations in progress made by children are swiftly identified and acted upon so that all groups of children make good or better progress given their starting points 27/10/2015

p.2

Due Date

 ensure equality of opportunity is promoted through teaching and learning so that the childcare is accessible and inclusive, and that no child is treated less favourably than another child by reason of the child's gender, or disability and/or learning difficulty. 27/10/2015 To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

Due Date

 reflect on practice in more detail to identify all weaknesses and use these findings to develop targeted action plans that support improvement, particularly in children's learning and development.

p.3

Inspection activities

 The inspector observed the childminder's practice with the children.  The inspector discussed the children's development with the childminder.  The inspector discussed the process of self-evaluation with the childminder and how she obtains the views of all those that use her provision.  The inspector examined a selection of documentation, including online progress reports and parents' comments on the provision.

p.3

Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate

The childminder's monitoring of the quality of the provision is not rigorous enough. Gaps in children's learning are not being quickly identified or targeted through appropriately challenging activities. Assessments of learning have not been used to good effect so children are falling further behind in their learning. The childminder has completed a range of training courses, including some that promote communication and language skills. However, she has not applied what she has learnt to her practice. The childminder's self- evaluation has not identified areas of weakness, so these remain. As a result, she has not sufficiently improved the provision for children's learning and development. Safeguarding is effective.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate

The quality of teaching is weak. The childminder does not plan for the specific needs of the children in her care. Her interactions do not build on what children know or need to do next. As a result, older children, particularly groups of boys, are not being engaged or challenged in their learning. The childminder uses a basic selection of play materials to occupy babies. She does not promote equality of opportunity as some children get more attention than others. This significantly affects the progress some children make in their communication and social skills. The childminder liaises with parents daily to share children's routines and experiences. However, she does not support them to understand how their child is doing in relation to their age or stage of development, or actively work with them to seek timely interventions where required.

p.4

Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate

The childminder does not effectively support children's emotional well-being. She leaves babies to play by themselves alongside older children in the setting. This does not foster secure or trusting attachments for the youngest children. In addition, the rigid routine of the day prevents children from making their own choices. For example, the childminder is slow to respond to children's repeated requests to play outside. She often over directs children; they do not have opportunities to do things for themselves, such as taking responsibility for self-care skills. This limits their independence in readiness for school. The childminder does not guide children's behaviour through positive interaction. This does not promote children's self-esteem or help them learn about managing their feelings.

p.4

Outcomes for children are inadequate

Children with identified needs and those who receive additional funding do not make as much progress as their peers, given their starting points. The childminder has not effectively addressed these gaps. In particular, she has not provided effective support for children to catch up in their communication, language and social skills. As a result, they are not well prepared for their move to school.

p.4

Setting details

Unique reference number EY408741 Local authority Hampshire Inspection number 831691 Type of provision Childminder Day care type Childminder Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 0 - 5 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 3

p.5

Name of provider

Date of previous inspection 13 December 2010

p.5

Telephone number

The childminder registered in 2010. She lives in the Lychpit area of Basingstoke, in Hampshire. She operates flexibly all year round. The childminder holds a relevant early years qualification at level 3. She receives funding for free early education for children aged two, three and four years.

p.5

Telephone number

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the Early Years Foundation Stage.

p.5

Telephone number

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.5

Telephone number

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

Telephone number

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.6

Telephone number

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion