Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)
Cygnets Pre-school
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
2 Dec 2015
- Inspectors verified
Jo Caswell
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Outcomes verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Requires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Good
- Postcode verified
OX26 6SX
- Name on report verified
Cygnets Pre-School
- URN verified
EY267146
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.
- OverallGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- OutcomesGood
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
- Teaching, learning and assessmentGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment4
“Children benefit from high quality teaching.” p.3Safeguarding2
“Safeguarding arrangements are effective.” p.3Leadership & governance2
“A strong management team leads the pre-school.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 708
- about usual (typical 703)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Cygnets Pre-School Langford Village Community Primary School, Peregrine Way, Bicester, Oxfordshire. OX26 6SX
p.1
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 2 December 2015 2 December 2014
p.1
This inspection: Good 2
Previous inspection: Requires Improvement
p.1
This inspection: Good 2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Good 2
p.1
This inspection: Good 2
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good 2
p.1
This inspection: Good 2
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good 2
p.1
This provision is good
A strong management team leads the pre-school. Staff have worked tirelessly since the last inspection to make many improvements. These have significantly enhanced the quality of teaching and the support for children's learning. Children enjoy very close relationships with the staff. This helps them to settle quickly and make good progress in their learning and development. As the pre-school now has sole use of its premises, the learning environment and organisation of the daily routine have significantly improved. Children arrive at pre-school happy and ready to learn. They approach the staff confidently for comfort and support and their individual emotional needs are met very well. Good attention is paid towards keeping children safe. The premises are warm and welcoming and provide a very homely, nurturing environment.
p.1
It is not yet outstanding because:
Information about how children learn and the progress they make is not routinely shared with other settings children attend. Although staff regularly reflect on their practice and make improvements, the current procedures for self-evaluation do not help staff measure how well they are doing and strive for the highest level.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
ensure information about children's learning needs and identified next steps are shared with other settings children attend. make better use of the self-evaluation process to help staff understand how to achieve the highest levels of care, and monitor progress towards this more robustly
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector observed the quality of teaching and the support for children's learning both inside and outside. The inspector talked to staff about how they plan for each child's learning needs and measure children's progress. The inspector also asked staff about the pre-school's policies and procedures and checked staff knew what to do if they had concerns about a child's safety or welfare. The inspector carried out a joint observation with the pre-school manager to evaluate the quality of teaching and to see how well leaders and managers recognise good practice and know how to develop the skills of their staff. The inspector talked to children about what they enjoy doing at pre-school. The inspector talked to parents who were available on the day of inspection and asked them for their views on the quality of practice and the progress their children make at the pre-school. The inspector looked at some records and documentation including confirmation that
p.2
Inspection activities
staff have been suitability checked to work with children, records of staff training and qualifications, children's progress checks, the pre-school's development plan and safeguarding checks.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is good
Staff regularly reflect on their practice and know what needs to improve. For example, they have re-developed the outside area and this now provides a highly stimulating and inviting place for children to play and learn. Staff training is given high priority and regular supervision meetings, annual appraisals and team meetings mean staff keep their knowledge and skills up-to-date. Leaders and managers carry out regular observations of practice and help staff to identify any development needs. Safeguarding arrangements are effective. Staff have made themselves aware of new guidance and appropriate systems are in place to ensure that all staff remain suitable to work with children. Routine consultations ensure parents' and children's views are regularly sought and used to enhance the provision. Good use of the 'Communication Tree' helps to develop close communication between home and pre-school.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is good
Children benefit from high quality teaching. Staff know the children well and understand how they prefer to learn. Many opportunities are provided for children to explore freely and develop their knowledge and skills. For example, on the day of inspection, children enjoyed being the 'Christmas elves' and wrapping presents to put under the tree. The activity covered all areas of learning and good emphasis was given towards encouraging children to think creatively, to solve problems and to use their imagination. Good mathematical teaching was introduced as staff helped children use comparative language, such as 'longer than' and 'shorter than' when using the tape and ribbons. Staff deployment is good. Staff sit with the children and allow them time to find different ways of doing things. Good support is given to developing children's language and communication skills. For example, during the 'Hello' greeting song, children combine
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are good
Children thoroughly enjoy their time at pre-school. They behave well and play happily together as staff help children develop good social skills. For example, the group snack time helps children learn to listen to one another and talk confidently as part of a group. There are good opportunities for children to become independent. For example, they butter their toast at snack time. They understand the importance of personal care routines and become increasingly confident, especially with hand washing routines and taking coats and aprons on and off. Every child is valued within the pre-school and staff teach children the importance of respecting one another. Low level displays help children see their work displayed creatively. This boosts children's self-esteem and helps them develop important skills to support their future learning.
p.3
Outcomes for children are good
Staff plan a stimulating and varied range of activities, both inside and outside, which interest children and offer relevant challenge. New assessment arrangements mean staff can now more closely monitor the progress of all groups of children and ensure any gaps in learning are quickly closed.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number EY267146 Local authority Oxfordshire Inspection number 1006258 Type of provision Full-time provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register Age range of children 2 - 5 Total number of places 16 Number of children on roll 43 Name of provider Cygnets Pre-school Committee Date of previous inspection 2 December 2014 Telephone number 01869 369021
p.4
Setting details
Cygnets Pre-School registered in 2003. It operates from premises within Langford Village Community Primary School in Bicester, Oxfordshire. It is run by a voluntary management committee. Children have access to an enclosed outdoor play area. The pre-school operates morning and afternoon sessions during school term times from 8.45am until 3.15pm, Monday to Friday. Places are available as wraparound care for three- and four- year-old children attending the on-site nursery class. The pre-school is registered on the Early Years Register. There are currently 43 children aged under five years on roll. The pre-school supports children learning English as an additional language and children with special educational needs and/or disabilities. Funding is accepted for the provision of free early education for children aged two, three and four years. The pre-school employs seven members of staff; of whom six hold relevant qualifications at levels 2 and 3.
p.4
Setting details
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the Early Years Foundation Stage.
p.4
Setting details
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
Setting details
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
Setting details
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.5
Setting details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion