Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 17 Dec 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

David Brown

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    David Brown

  • Postcode verified

    S5 8GN

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+6Mostly positivemore positive than 28% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivepositiveeffectivelyconsistentlyimprovedwell preparedenthusiasmpromptly
Criticismunsafebelowtoo lowdisruptionlackdecliningpersistently absentunclear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings713w+11
  • What needs to improve63w−33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
772
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 87%What needs to improve 8%About the inspection 5%

Full report text

Angela Lant Executive Headteacher Meynell Primary School Meynell Road Sheffield South Yorkshire S5 8GN

p.1

No formal designation monitoring inspection of Meynell Primary School

Following my visit to your academy on 25 November 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and the time you took to discuss behaviour in your school.

p.1

No formal designation monitoring inspection of Meynell Primary School

The inspection was a monitoring inspection carried out in accordance with the no formal designation procedures and conducted under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was carried out because Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector was concerned about behaviour at the academy.

p.1

Evidence

Her Majesty’s Inspector (HMI) considered evidence including:

p.1

Evidence

 observations of pupils’ behaviour and their attitudes to learning in lessons  observations of pupils’ behaviour throughout the day, including discussion with pupils  documentary evidence  discussions with school leaders and staff.

p.1

Evidence

Having evaluated all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Evidence

Leaders and managers have taken effective action to improve behaviour and secure consistently positive attitudes to learning.

p.1

Context

Meynell Primary School is much larger than the average-sized primary school. The proportion of disadvantaged pupils eligible for support through the pupil premium funding is well above the national average. The pupil premium is additional funding Ofsted

p.1

Context

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk for those pupils who are known to be eligible for free school meals and those children who are looked after by the local authority. The proportion of pupils identified as having special educational needs is above average. Those supported with a statement of special educational needs is below average. The proportion of pupils from minority ethnic groups or who have English as an additional language is below average. The proportion of pupils who join and leave the school other than the usual times is typical of that found in most primary schools.

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

At the time of the previous inspection attendance was too low. School leaders have focussed very effectively on a range of approaches to support pupils and their families to ensure that the pupils attend school regularly. Attendance, although still below the national average for primary schools, has improved for all pupil groups. Close working with parents has significantly reduced the proportion of pupils who are persistently absent. Current data show that the number of fixed term exclusions is falling rapidly, largely due to the effective use of the school inclusion base.

p.2

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

Observations at the beginning of the day show that the vast majority of pupils arrive on time and in an orderly manner. They behave sensibly as they enter the school and staff are available to meet pupils and parents. This calm behaviour is repeated at the end of the day as pupils leave the school.

p.2

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

Pupils’ behaviour in lessons is now typically good. Pupils arrive punctually, are well prepared, and are keen to engage in their work. Pupils talk with enthusiasm about their lessons, and take pride in their written work. Staff deal promptly with any low- level disruption which only occurs when pupils are unclear of what they have to do next or when lessons lack challenge. The school has a clear behaviour policy which is understood and used by all staff. Pupils enjoy the rewards they can achieve and consistent staff use of the policy helps pupils develop good attitudes to learning and to each other.

p.2

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

Pupils move around the school with care and consideration for other pupils and for adults. Displays in classrooms and corridors are attractive and include many examples of pupils’ work that emphasises the school’s positive approach to learning, behaviour and safety.

p.2

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

Pupils say that they feel very safe in school. They have an accurate understanding of what makes an unsafe situation and are able to talk knowledgeably about online safety and the potential dangers of using social media. They are taught about different forms of bullying, including homophobic and racist bullying, and know that if they witness or experience it staff would deal with it promptly.

p.2

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

The school has an inclusion base for addressing short-term misbehaviour. The behaviour policy, used effectively by staff and understood well by pupils, has led to the number of referrals to the base declining rapidly since the inspection.

p.2

Personal development, behaviour and welfare

HMI met with a number of parents at the beginning and end of the school day. A minority of parents have not noted recent improvements in behaviour and have a more negative view than that described by pupils and observed around the school.

p.2

Priorities for further improvement

 Continue to reduce overall and persistent absence.

p.3

Priorities for further improvement

 Continue to work to improve communication with all parents so that they better understand the work of the school.

p.3

Priorities for further improvement

I am copying this letter to the Director of Children’s Services for Sheffield, the Secretary of State for Education and the Chair of the Governing Body. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion