Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)
Childminder in Kent
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
19 Nov 2015
- Inspectors verified
Geetha Ramesh
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectivenesssingle source
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Name on report verified
Childminder Report
- URN verified
125317
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
6% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The childminder does not consistently guide children's progress based on a fully secure knowledge of the ages and stages of their development. p.1
- This does not enable children to make consistently good progress in their learning. p.1
- The childminder does not always track and monitor children's progress effectively and plan precisely for their individual needs. p.1
- Assessments, including progress checks for two-year-old children, are not always accurate and fully effective in identifying gaps in children's learning. p.1
- Occasionally, the childminder does not reshape planned activities effectively to take account of children's emerging interests. p.1
- The childminder has not made good enough progress towards some of the recommendations raised in the previous inspection. p.1
- Children develop strong bonds with her and are emotionally secure. p.1
- The childminder provides a suitable range of resources for children to access and they develop confidence and independence as they choose and explore freely. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Wellbeing & mental health2
“Children develop strong bonds with her and are emotionally secure.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 722
- about usual (typical 743)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 41, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 17%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 19 November 2015 23 November 2011
p.1
3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good 2
p.1
3
Outcomes for children Requires improvement
p.1
This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:
The childminder does not consistently guide children's progress based on a fully secure knowledge of the ages and stages of their development. This does not enable children to make consistently good progress in their learning. The childminder does not always track and monitor children's progress effectively and plan precisely for their individual needs. Assessments, including progress checks for two-year-old children, are not always accurate and fully effective in identifying gaps in children's learning. The quality of teaching is variable. Occasionally, the childminder does not reshape planned activities effectively to take account of children's emerging interests. Self-evaluation is not fully robust. The childminder has not made good enough progress towards some of the recommendations raised in the previous inspection.
p.1
It has the following strengths
The childminder is gentle and caring. Children develop strong bonds with her and are emotionally secure. The childminder provides a suitable range of resources for children to access and they develop confidence and independence as they choose and explore freely. The childminder works in partnership with parents to establish routines for children. She maintains a two-way flow of information with parents to enable them to continue children's care and learning at home. Parents express the view that their children are happy and safe in the childminder's care.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
develop a secure knowledge and understanding of the ages and stages of children's development and use this effectively to plan precisely for individual children's learning 19/02/2016
p.2
Due Date
ensure that assessment and monitoring of children's progress, including the required progress check for children aged two years, are effective in identifying children's individual learning needs and in supporting their steady progress from their starting points. 19/02/2016
p.2
Due Date
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
Due Date
strengthen further opportunities for children to follow their emerging interests during play strengthen self-evaluation to identify all areas that need improvement.
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector observed children and their interactions with the childminder. The inspector viewed children's developmental records. The inspector viewed a sample of the childminder's policies and procedures. The inspector carried out discussions with the childminder when appropriate. The inspector took account of the views of parents and children.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement
The childminder seeks parental views and shares good practice with other childminders, which helps her raise the quality of her provision in some areas. However, she has not made suitable progress towards recommendations raised at the previous inspection in relation to the learning and development requirements. She has not developed effective processes for monitoring children's progress and for identifying gaps in their learning. The childminder has a secure knowledge of procedures to follow to protect children and help to ensure their safety. Safeguarding is effective. The childminder shares information with other settings that children attend and with teachers when children move to school. She provides an inclusive setting in which all children and their families feel welcome.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
The childminder does not always assess children's progress accurately. This does not enable her to plan and consistently provide challenging activities to motivate them in their learning. Also, when children lose interest in planned activities, the childminder does not always take their lead and support them to follow their interests. Nevertheless, children demonstrate familiarity with the resources and routines at the setting and are generally happily engaged in play. For example, they eagerly explored electronic equipment. Young children pressed buttons, turned knobs on the baby walker, and observed the effect of their actions. As older children joined in, the childminder introduced letters and numbers. Children develop their mathematical skills, for instance, as they explore and sort shapes and complete number puzzles.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are good
Children develop positive relationships with each other. The childminder is a good role model. Children follow her example and spontaneously use polite words. Young children settle well when she comforts them, for example, when they wake up after a nap. They exchange smiles and cuddles with the childminder as they play. Children display positive self-esteem, for instance, the childminder offers plenty of praise and encouragement. The childminder provides regular opportunities for them to exercise and to develop a healthy lifestyle. She works in close partnership with parents, for example, she helps support them through the weaning process for babies. She provides nutritious foods and meets the dietary needs of individual children.
p.3
Outcomes for children require improvement
Overall, children develop the key skills that support their progress to the next stages in their learning. However, gaps in the assessment and planning mean that the childminder occasionally misses some opportunities to strengthen their learning and help them make the best possible progress.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number 125317 Local authority Kent Inspection number 840527 Type of provision Childminder Day care type Childminder Age range of children 0 - 8 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 5
p.4
Name of provider
Date of previous inspection 23 November 2011
p.4
Telephone number
The childminder registered in 1998. She lives in Swanley, in Kent. The childminder provides childcare all day on weekdays, for most of the year.
p.4
Telephone number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the Early Years Foundation Stage.
p.4
Telephone number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
Telephone number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
Telephone number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.5
Telephone number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion