Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 7 Dec 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Mark Evans

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Mark Evans

  • Postcode verified

    DL8 3BJ

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+90Very positivemore positive than 93% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelypositivevery wellrobustclearconfidenthigh expectationseffective
Criticismconcernnot strong

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings909w+90
  • What needs to improve105w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,007
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 79%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 12%

Full report text

Charlotte Harper Executive Headteacher Askrigg Voluntary Controlled Primary School Yorebridge Askrigg Leyburn North Yorkshire DL8 3BJ

p.1

Short inspection of Askrigg Voluntary Controlled School

Following my visit to the school on 5 November 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in May 2012.

p.1

Short inspection of Askrigg Voluntary Controlled School

You and the leadership team have maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. This is because you have made sure that the outcomes of pupils continue to be good through rigorous monitoring of the quality of teaching and pupils’ learning. Because of this pupils are well prepared for secondary school.

p.1

Short inspection of Askrigg Voluntary Controlled School

The governing body is well led and knowledgeable about the school. Governors make robust and detailed checks on the school’s work through regular and very precisely focused visits and follow-up discussion. Governors evaluate the impact of leaders’ actions and provide challenge that contributes to keeping the school on track.

p.1

Short inspection of Askrigg Voluntary Controlled School

The previous inspection identified the need for pupils to have a clearer understanding of their own attainment and progress through a more consistent use of target setting. The school has moved effectively to address this. Pupils are clear about their targets and understand what they need to do to improve. The whole- school approach to marking and assessment underpins this understanding very well.

p.1

Short inspection of Askrigg Voluntary Controlled School

Your own monitoring of the school has identified that pupils’ outcomes in mathematics have not been as strong as they should be. You have moved effectively to address this. More focused teaching and monitoring combined with the whole- Ofsted

p.1

Short inspection of Askrigg Voluntary Controlled School

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk school ‘Space Mission’ approach has had a positive impact on outcomes in mathematics across the school.

p.1

Short inspection of Askrigg Voluntary Controlled School

The school is a calm and well-ordered place. A strong sense of pride in the school is apparent in pupils, staff and parents. Pupils say that they enjoy school and appreciate the care and challenge that teachers show. They are particularly positive about the RESPECT approach to behaviour and attitudes to learning. They say that they appreciate the way it helps them understand the links between positive behaviour, thoughtful understanding of other peoples’ viewpoints and learning.

p.2

Short inspection of Askrigg Voluntary Controlled School

Parents with whom I spoke and those who responded to the online survey, Parent View, are overwhelmingly supportive of the school. They are particularly complimentary about the leadership and the way you engage and seek parents’ views. Parents are confident that their children are happy, safe and well taught.

p.2

Short inspection of Askrigg Voluntary Controlled School

You and governors attach the highest priority to ensuring that all pupils are safe. You have put robust systems in place that are followed rigorously. Frequent review helps to ensure that safeguarding procedures are fit for purpose and pupils’ safety is assured. Regular training helps staff and governors understand clearly what constitutes risk and keeps them up to date with best practice. Pupils report that they feel safe. Should they feel uncertain, pupils are clear that they could turn, with confidence, to any member of staff and their concern would be dealt with promptly and effectively. Pupils work and play well together. They are confident and thoughtful. They are aware of the needs of others in their community and the wider world. This is because the school works hard to ensure that what pupils learn and experience takes account of, and develops, their spiritual, moral, social and cultural understanding.

p.2

Inspection findings

 The school is very well led. The executive headteacher is clear about what needs to be done for the school to improve further. She communicates her high expectations robustly; these are shared by staff, pupils, parents and governors. Governors are both strategic and detailed in their approach. They hold leaders to account through very detailed questioning about the precise impact leaders’ and teachers’ actions are having on pupils’ learning and well-being.

p.2

Inspection findings

 The headteacher monitors the school rigorously. The headteacher has put in place effective systems to check on the quality and impact of teaching. These systems are effective because the information that the headteacher and, increasingly, middle leaders gather and evaluate is carefully and creatively linked to staff training. This means that teachers’ expertise is further strengthened and developed.  The work of subject leaders is a growing strength of the school. The headteacher is developing and extending the skills of these middle leaders so that they can even more effectively support, monitor and evaluate the work of their teams. The headteacher supports middle leaders well and regularly checks their work. This approach is having an increasingly positive impact on pupils’ outcomes across the school.

p.2

Inspection findings

 Pupils who have special educational needs do well. This is because this aspect of the school is effectively led by the special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) and carefully measured by governors. The SENCo regularly works with staff to ensure that, through focused monitoring and support, the provision for these pupils is of the highest quality.

p.3

Inspection findings

 The school’s curriculum is broad and balanced, imaginatively planned and its impact is carefully monitored. It prepares pupils for life in modern Britain. A wide range of sports and physical activities is offered to all pupils during school time and there are opportunities for after-school clubs. French is taught successfully to all pupils in Key Stage 2. Both parents and pupils report that the breadth of subjects and related opportunities is a real strength of the school.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and governors should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the school

 the improvements to outcomes in mathematics develop and deepen as a result of the continued and relentless focus by all staff on the mathematical needs of each pupil

p.3

Next steps for the school

 the good practice and skills of middle leaders are further extended so that they are precise and detailed in the monitoring and support of their teams and are clear about what is having a positive impact on pupils’ outcomes.

p.3

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for North Yorkshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Information about the inspection

During this short, one-day inspection I met with you, subject leaders, a range of staff and members of the governing body, including the Chair of Governors. I also spoke with a local authority officer. I visited classrooms with you and saw a full range of lessons, including French and physical education. While in the lessons, where appropriate, I spoke with pupils about their work and experience of the school. I also scrutinised a range of pupils’ books. I spoke more formally with a group of pupils at lunchtime. I spoke informally with individual and groups of parents and reviewed information on Parent View. I evaluated a range of documents including the school’s most recent evaluations of its performance and records and logs of behaviour. I attended an act of collective worship at the end of the school day.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion