Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)
Romiley Methodist Pre-School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
6 Nov 2015
- Inspectors verified
Helen Royston
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
SK6 3AH
- Name on report verified
Romiley Methodist Pre- School
- URN verified
307175
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The safeguarding policy for the setting does not include information about how to manage allegations against members of staff. p.1
- Staff do not consistently assess children's progress or plan for their next steps in learning to ensure that they are helped to make good progress. p.1
- This limits their opportunities to support and extend children's learning, and therefore not all children are engaged and involved in activities and routines. p.1
- The manager has not kept staff knowledge up to date regarding recent policies and practice in the early years. p.1
- The manager is aware of the strengths and weaknesses of staff performance; however, she does not review identified actions to improve practice in a timely manner. p.1
- Parents are not kept accurately informed about their children's progress and needs or how to further support their learning in the home. p.1
- The staff's relationships with the children are sensitive, caring and kind. p.1
- They take time to support children settling in to the pre-school and work with parents to ensure children's care needs are well met. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Safeguarding4
“Arrangements for safeguarding are effective.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 869
- about usual (typical 773)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 50, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Romiley Methodist Pre- School Hill Street, Romiley, Stockport, SK6 3AH
p.1
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 6 November 2015 4 February 2010
p.1
3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement Outcomes for children Requires improvement
p.1
This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:
The safeguarding policy for the setting does not include information about how to manage allegations against members of staff. Staff do not consistently assess children's progress or plan for their next steps in learning to ensure that they are helped to make good progress. Staff are not always well deployed. This limits their opportunities to support and extend children's learning, and therefore not all children are engaged and involved in activities and routines. The manager has not kept staff knowledge up to date regarding recent policies and practice in the early years. The quality of teaching is variable. The manager is aware of the strengths and weaknesses of staff performance; however, she does not review identified actions to improve practice in a timely manner. Parents are not kept accurately informed about their children's progress and needs or how to further support their learning in the home.
p.1
It has the following strengths
The staff's relationships with the children are sensitive, caring and kind. They take time to support children settling in to the pre-school and work with parents to ensure children's care needs are well met. The environment is welcoming and well resourced, both indoors and outdoors. Children can independently choose where to play and select their own resources.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
include information in the setting's safeguarding policy about what action should be taken in the event of an allegation being made against a member of staff 27/11/2015
p.2
Due Date
assess children's learning consistently and accurately to identify what they need to learn next, and plan activities which support children to make good progress 18/12/2015
p.2
Due Date
review the organisation of staff during activities and routines to engage and involve children, ensuring that opportunities to support and extend children's learning are well used. 18/12/2015
p.2
Due Date
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
Due Date
improve staff knowledge of current policies and practice in early years through a well- targeted professional development programme monitor and review areas requiring improvement in staff practice and address these swiftly to improve the quality of teaching overall share accurate information with parents about children's progress and offer ideas about how to further support learning in the home.
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities indoors and assessed the impact this has on children's learning. The inspector completed a joint observation with the manager. The inspector held a meeting with the manager and looked at relevant documentation, such as the children's development files, staff appraisals, policies and procedures. The inspector spoke to a small selection of parents during the inspection and took account of their views recorded in the setting's questionnaires.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement
Arrangements for safeguarding are effective. The staff know what to do if they are worried about the welfare of a child in their care. There are relevant policies and procedures in place which are shared as a booklet with parents. However, the safeguarding policy does not include what action to take if an allegation is made against a member of staff. Three members of staff hold appropriate childcare qualifications and all staff attend some professional development opportunities. The manager completes staff appraisals each year, although these have little impact on the quality of the teaching as the improvements needed are not monitored frequently enough. The manager has not kept the team up to date about statutory and other government requirements. She reflects on the provision to identify strengths and weaknesses and gathers parents' views. The team has developed good relationships with parents and works closely with
p.3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement
professionals, such as the local advisory teacher.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
The quality of teaching is variable. Staff encourage good listening skills during story time and enthusiastically sing songs while playing instruments. However, the questions staff ask about numbers during singing time do not challenge children's understanding of number. Staff are not always well deployed across the room. Children's play in the home corner lacks adult support to help to develop their imaginative skills. Staff observe children during play and have started to monitor their progress across the areas of learning. However, next steps in children's learning are not identified consistently, and therefore planning does not always meet children's individual needs. Parents receive a summary of their children's progress; however, there are no targets identified to promote further learning. Children choose a book each day to share with parents. This helps to promote home learning and support literacy skills.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare require improvement
Children are supported to settle gradually in the pre-school and benefit from caring and kind relationships with the staff. Staff promote children's independence well during activities and care routines. Children enjoy pouring their own drinks at snack time and wash their hands as the staff talk about getting rid of germs. They are able to choose their own resources and follow their own ideas in play. The staff provide a range of activities and resources which the children enjoy, for example, they paint pictures and use boxes and tubes to make models. This helps to support their creativity. There are a range of physical activities provided outdoors and children enjoy chasing each other as they crawl through the tunnel inside. Children generally behave well, although they choose not to help at tidy-up time as staff are not close by to support them.
p.3
Outcomes for children require improvement
Some children are making typical progress for their age; however, some are working below expectations. The setting records children's starting points, and progress is starting to be reviewed at more regular intervals. Key skills for school, such as mathematics and literacy, are promoted by the staff in a variety of ways.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number 307175 Local authority Stockport Inspection number 867725 Type of provision Sessional provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Age range of children 2 - 3 Total number of places 17 Number of children on roll 17 Name of provider Romiley Methodist Pre-School Committee Date of previous inspection 4 February 2010 Telephone number 0161 430 8080
p.4
Setting details
Romiley Methodist Pre-School was registered in 1992. The pre-school employs four members of childcare staff, three of whom hold appropriate early years qualifications at levels 2 and 3. The pre-school opens from Monday to Friday during term time only. Sessions are from 9am until 12am on a Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and Friday, and on Wednesday from 12.30am until 3.30pm. The pre-school provides funded early education for two-, three-, and four-year-old children.
p.4
Setting details
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the Early Years Foundation Stage.
p.4
Setting details
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
Setting details
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
Setting details
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.5
Setting details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion