Other · Ofsted report
Newham Sixth Form College
Summary
Jo Parkman (lead), Marinette Bazin, Nick Gadfield, Richard Beynon
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
23 Oct 2015
- Inspectors verified
Jo Parkman, Marinette Bazin, Nick Gadfield, Richard Beynon
- Name on report verified
Newham Sixth Form College
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- A wide range of work-related and enrichment activities, coupled with a strong focus on progression to higher education, provides a strong boost to students’ economic prospects. p.3
- Students enjoy their learning, and teaching staff enable them to grow in self-confidence and to be aspirational by setting high expectations for their behaviour and attitude to learning. p.5
- Students receive excellent help with applications to higher education and benefit greatly from the college’s good relationship with its local higher education institute. p.5
- Students enjoy learning, are ambitious, and develop good learning and team working skills. p.1
- The proportion of students who achieve at AS level has improved since 2013/14 and overall students on AS courses now make good progress. p.5
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, as was the case at the previous inspection, feedback to students is not always good enough and too few students pass their mathematics GCSE at grades A* to C, or achieve functional skills in English or mathematics at level 2. p.3
- However, this does not always result in teachers setting appropriate short-term targets for these talented students in lessons and they do not always make the progress expected. p.4
- However, the quality of feedback is poor on work with a large number of errors, and often reduced to broad statements, such as ‘include more detail’. p.4
- Functional skills achievements at level 2 are very poor for both English and mathematics, and the proportion of students who achieve a grade C or above in GCSE mathematics is low. p.5
- The teaching of mathematics during lessons in other subject areas is not good enough. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Rapidly improve teachers’ skills, confidence and abilities to develop their students’ English and mathematics skills. p.2
- Ensure that in all subject lessons teachers plan, and use, opportunities to develop these skills as part of study programmes at level 3. p.2
- Focus staff development activities on guaranteeing that all teachers have strategies to ensure that the checking of learning, and feedback to support improvement meet the needs of the students who require the most help. p.2
- Enable the most-able students to make good progress on AS and A-level courses by ensuring that teachers recognise these students’ abilities and set them appropriately demanding tasks in lessons. p.2
- Fully implement plans to link individual governors to curriculum areas so that their expertise is used more effectively to improve the quality of different subject areas so that all students progress and achieve well. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 2,777
- longer than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 39, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
FE&S report Newham Sixth Form College Sixth Form College
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good
p.1
Overall effectiveness Good
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement
p.1
This is a good provider
The large majority of students make good progress and achieve well in their chosen subject areas. Students enjoy learning, are ambitious, and develop good learning and team working skills. An effective curriculum supports students to progress to higher education using a variety of academic and vocational routes. The college manages its finances very well and to the benefit of students. The proportion of students who progress from AS to A level, and on to higher education, is high. Attendance and punctuality are very good. Effective performance management has resulted in improvement in the quality of teaching at the college. Tutors provide very good support for those students who wish to secure university places.
p.1
This is a good provider
Too few students achieve functional skills in mathematics and English, or mathematics GCSE at grade C or above. Teachers do not always use strategies for teaching, assessment and feedback that enable them to support the least-able students effectively. The most-able students on AS and A-level courses do not make the progress expected, given their starting points. A minority of students do not receive a broad enough education about life in the United Kingdom and British values. The teaching of mathematics during lessons in other subject areas is not good enough. Students are insufficiently involved in the promotion and implementation of the college’s statutory duties under Prevent legislation. Links between governors and curriculum areas or subjects are not yet working effectively to improve the quality of teaching and students’ achievements.
p.1
Information about the provider
Newham Sixth Form College, situated in east London, is one of the largest sixth form colleges in London. The London Borough of Newham is characterised by the indices of multiple deprivation as one of the poorest parts of England. The very large majority of students at the college are from a minority ethnic heritage. The proportion of young people not in education, employment or training in the borough is similar to that nationally. The college offers a wide range of courses from foundation programmes to A levels and vocational programmes at levels 2 and 3. However, the majority of students at the college are aged 16 to 19 and are on study programmes, with most aiming to progress to higher education. The proportion of students from disadvantaged backgrounds and with low prior attainment is higher than for other similar colleges.
p.2
What does the provider need to do to improve further?
Rapidly improve teachers’ skills, confidence and abilities to develop their students’ English and mathematics skills. Ensure that in all subject lessons teachers plan, and use, opportunities to develop these skills as part of study programmes at level 3. Focus staff development activities on guaranteeing that all teachers have strategies to ensure that the checking of learning, and feedback to support improvement meet the needs of the students who require the most help. Enable the most-able students to make good progress on AS and A-level courses by ensuring that teachers recognise these students’ abilities and set them appropriately demanding tasks in lessons. Fully implement plans to link individual governors to curriculum areas so that their expertise is used more effectively to improve the quality of different subject areas so that all students progress and achieve well. Rapidly devise and implement plans to engage students fully in the government’s Prevent agenda and
p.2
What does the provider need to do to improve further?
implement the existing good practice in the promotion of British values, ensuring that all students explore personal, social and ethical topics in order to face the challenges of life in modern Britain confidently and safely.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management is good
Governors and the Principal have made an effective response to most areas for improvement from the previous inspection. As a result, the proportion of students who achieve their qualifications has improved. The quality of teaching, learning and assessment has improved, with greater consistency in quality across subject areas. However, as was the case at the previous inspection, feedback to students is not always good enough and too few students pass their mathematics GCSE at grades A* to C, or achieve functional skills in English or mathematics at level 2. Senior leaders have a clear vision for the improvements that still need to be made at the college. Managers and staff understand and share this vision. A trusting and forward-looking relationship exists between leaders, managers and staff across the college with a widely shared concern for students’ success. Senior leaders and programme team managers are confident in their use of performance data, quality
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management is good
assurance and quality monitoring systems to bring about improvements in the provision. Managers successfully recalibrated the college’s lesson observation processes following the previous inspection in order to focus more closely on students’ experiences of lessons and their learning and progress. Observations now provide a more reliable gauge of the quality of teaching, learning and assessment; managers use this effectively to target interventions and improvement strategies. However, a few measures are still in an early stage of development; for example, learning walks have only recently been introduced and as yet too few teachers and senior leaders carry these out. Performance management arrangements are effective in helping managers to raise standards of teaching, learning and assessment. Managers support new staff well during their probationary period, providing helpful and challenging training and assessing their suitability for their roles. For new and established staff
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management is good
whose performance does not meet required standards, managers put in place good levels of support and guidance for improvement. Where appropriate, managers take robust action to safeguard standards. Senior managers have re-vitalised and re-focused staff development activities since the previous inspection. They make good use of the five days of formal development activity each year and staff value these days and their focus on improving the student experience. The selection process for learning coach posts is now more robust. Coaches provide a good level of support for staff who have development needs and for managers in dissemination of improvement strategies. Such is the trust and value placed on the coaching team that individual teachers are now beginning to approach coaches for support without referral by their managers. Financial management is particularly strong and senior leaders apply and develop college resources very
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management is good
effectively to enhance students’ experiences at the college. A major building and campus redevelopment project is underway with little or no disruption to teaching and learning or students’ enjoyment of their college experience. Governors and leaders ensure that the college’s curriculum meets the needs of students well and contributes to the economic growth of local communities. A wide range of work-related and enrichment activities, coupled with a strong focus on progression to higher education, provides a strong boost to students’ economic prospects. Leaders and managers work closely with a broad range of educational, commercial and local government partners to review and revise the curriculum. Success rates for English and particularly for mathematics require improvement to ensure that all students have a useful set of qualifications at the end of their study programmes, as well as the skills they will need
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management is good
to follow academic courses in higher education. Managers have brought about improvements in English GCSE success rates, but too few students make the progress they should in developing effective English and mathematics skills. The governance of the provider Governance is good. Governors bring a strong set of relevant skills to their positions, including skills in education, finance, policy, and project management. Student governors receive good support and make an informed and valuable contribution to business. Governors’ grasp of key performance data has improved since the previous inspection and managers now receive good levels of challenge and support from governors. Governors do not link sufficiently closely to individual subject areas and thus cannot support and challenge under-performing areas with sufficient rigour. This hinders the senior leaders’ ability to make the best use of their skills, experience and commitment to increase the speed of improvement. Plans are
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management is good
in place to link a number of governors to curriculum areas or groups of subjects in the college in the near future. The arrangements for safeguarding are effective Leaders, teachers and other staff are aware of their responsibilities to students who may need their help or who might be at risk of harm. Managers carry out comprehensive employment and background checks on staff and keep clear and full records of these. Students know how to keep themselves safe in lessons, around the college and online. They are respectful of each other and of their teachers. College managers work hard to ensure that the college environment and student body reflects the culturally diverse nature of the locality. Managers have successfully raised the awareness of staff and governors to the dangers of radicalisation and extremism and the college’s responsibilities under the Prevent agenda. Student union and student council representatives received briefings on the college’s duties under Prevent legislation and the
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management is good
Principal informs all new students about the college’s duties during a welcome address. However, leaders have been much too slow to involve students more widely in discussions of the ways that the college might best approach its legal duties and how students might contribute to the fulfilment of those duties. Despite clear management policies, a single faith group clearly dominates the multi-faith room; it does not provide a suitably comfortable and welcoming place for staff and students of all faiths and beliefs to use for prayer or quiet reflection.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is good
Students enjoy their lessons and develop very good attitudes towards learning and study. Teachers promote equality and diversity in the classroom very well. As a result, students respect each other’s views and develop very good attitudes towards working collaboratively and harmoniously. Students greatly improve their team-working and communication skills due to teachers’ support and guidance when they work together on shared tasks or projects. Staff provide particularly effective personal and learning support for students. Additional learning support in and out of the classroom, including through the use of information learning technology, ensures that those students who need extra help are able to keep up with their work and are confident to catch up or continue their learning outside of the classroom. Staff provide good personal support which helps students to cope with difficulties such as homelessness, family crises or substance misuse and enables them to attend
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is good
regularly and punctually. Staff prepare students well for the next steps toward their career aims and regularly review their long-term goals. Staff are aspirational about their further learning and careers. Specialist staff provide good-quality, well-informed impartial advice and guidance which helps students to make careful and well-researched choices. Tutors use tutorial time effectively to help students to reflect on their learning and progress. They help students to identify realistic and suitable higher education choices, complete their applications and write comprehensive and well-structured personal statements. Tutors monitor students’ progress well and provide effective verbal feedback; students have a good understanding of their progress and what they need to do to achieve their career aims. On A- and AS-level courses, teachers do not consistently provide sufficiently demanding activities to ensure
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is good
that the most-able students make good progress. Teachers are not always aware of the results of these students’ initial assessments, or target grades. As a result, they do not plan well enough to meet students’ needs for additional or more difficult tasks, or develop the potential of their academic skills. Students who are initially assessed as having high potential are enrolled on the college’s ‘honours programme’. However, this does not always result in teachers setting appropriate short-term targets for these talented students in lessons and they do not always make the progress expected. Teachers do not always use strategies for teaching, assessment and feedback that enable them to support the least-able students effectively. As a result, a minority of the least-able students become restless and confused when teachers’ explanations are too rushed or too complex. Teachers do not always check these
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is good
students’ understanding sufficiently so that students can build on their learning and make the best progress. When students produce work that requires only a few corrections or improvement, teachers provide good and very helpful feedback. However, the quality of feedback is poor on work with a large number of errors, and often reduced to broad statements, such as ‘include more detail’. This means that the students who would benefit most from feedback to improve their assignments do not always receive the help they need. A minority of students have to wait too long for marked work to be returned. Teaching staff are confident to improve student’s literacy skills in lessons, but the same is not true for mathematics. Although some teachers do this well, for example in engineering, in other subjects teachers avoid introducing mathematics and do not plan to include development of students’ skills in their lessons. As
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is good
a result, although students improve their use of English, the majority do not develop good mathematical skills or improve their existing knowledge and understanding of numeracy.
p.5
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are good
Students enjoy their learning, and teaching staff enable them to grow in self-confidence and to be aspirational by setting high expectations for their behaviour and attitude to learning. Students develop very good employment-related skills and learn the importance of being ready for work, punctual and attending regularly. Rates of attendance and punctuality are high. Students on vocational programmes at level 3 benefit from well-chosen work experience placements. Staff use their links with local employers very well to ensure that placements are relevant and allow students to test out the suitability of their career aims and to confirm their choices. However, work experience and work-related activities are less well developed for A-level students. Although these students can choose from a variety of work-related enrichment activities at the college, as yet planned work-related activities do not
p.5
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are good
form an integral part of each student’s A-level study programme. Students’ behaviour in class and in social areas of the college is good. Students from different backgrounds and cultures work together harmoniously and show respect for each other’s feelings and beliefs. Staff provide students with good advice and guidance on their next steps and on career opportunities throughout their time at college. They are particularly skilled at assisting students to achieve the entry requirements for higher education applications by promoting a mixture of academic and vocational pathways. If appropriate, they provide support and guidance for students to switch to a more vocational pathway in their second year of study, improving their chances of being offered a place at university. Students receive excellent help with applications to higher education and benefit greatly from the college’s good relationship with its local higher education institute.
p.5
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are good
Many staff take advantage of opportunities during teaching to allow students to explore and debate topics which relate directly to fundamental British values, but this good practice is not shared across all subject areas. In addition, not all subject areas offer the same opportunities for staff to raise these topics as a natural part of the curriculum. The college does not have a coherent planned approach to ensuring that students have a broad enough education about life in the United Kingdom and British values. Although a few relevant topics are included as part of the tutorial programme there is not enough focus on democracy, British law and information about such topics as women’s rights, forced marriage and female genital mutilation to help students to make informed choices and to stay safe.
p.5
Outcomes for learners are good
The large majority of students on AS-level, A-level and vocational level 3 programmes achieve well and in- line with the high rates achieved nationally. The proportion of students who achieve at AS level has improved since 2013/14 and overall students on AS courses now make good progress. However, at individual subject level the progress students make is very mixed. While it is very good or excellent in a minority of subjects, students in subjects including science or social science continue to make poor progress. The majority of students take vocational level 3 programmes and they make very good progress from their starting points. On AS- and A-level courses the minority of students who start with good prior attainment at GCSE make poor progress and do not achieve the higher grades predicted, given their achievement at GCSE. Staff prepare students well for the next step towards their career goals and high numbers progress from AS
p.5
Outcomes for learners are good
to A level. Where AS level students achieve below the level expected or needed for progression to higher education, they are transferred to a vocational programme at level 3; these students do particularly well at securing places in higher education. Overall, high numbers of students gain offers of places in higher education institutes, including Russell group universities. About half of all students who start study programmes at the college do not have both English and mathematics GCSEs at grade C or above. Although the proportion of students who achieve a grade C or above in English is better than other similar colleges nationally, less than half of those students who take GCSE English achieve grades A* to C. Functional skills achievements at level 2 are very poor for both English and mathematics, and the proportion of students who achieve a grade C or above in GCSE mathematics is low. There are no significant gaps between the achievements of different groups of students.
p.5
full contract year
Principal/CEO Eddie Playfair Website address www.newvic.ac.uk
p.6
Intermediate Advanced Higher
16-18 19+ 16-18 19+ 16-18 19+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 Number of traineeships 16-19 19+ Total 8 1 9 Number of learners aged 14–16 0
p.6
Intermediate Advanced Higher
Funding received from Education Funding Agency and Skills Funding Agency
p.6
Inspection team
Jo Parkman, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Richard Beynon Her Majesty’s Inspector Nick Gadfield Her Majesty’s Inspector Marinette Bazin Ofsted Inspector
p.7
Inspection team
The above team was assisted by the vice principal, as nominee, and carried out the inspection at short notice. Inspectors took account of the provider’s most recent self-assessment report and development plans, and the previous inspection report. Inspectors used group and individual interviews, telephone calls and online questionnaires to gather the views of students and employers; these views are reflected within the report. They observed learning sessions, assessments and progress reviews. The inspection took into account all relevant provision at the provider. guidance ‘Raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team,
p.8
Inspection team
The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk Learner View is a website where learners can tell Ofsted what they think about their college or provider. They can also see what other learners think about them too.
p.8
Inspection team
To find out more go to www.learnerview.ofsted.gov.uk
p.8
Inspection team
Employer View is a new website where employers can tell Ofsted what they think about their employees’ college or provider. They can also see what other employers think about them too.
p.8
Inspection team
To find out more go to www.employerview.ofsted.gov.uk
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion