Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)

Childminder in West Berkshire

Inspected 20 Oct 2015 · published 6 Nov 2015 · URN EY425078

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    20 Oct 2015

  • Inspectors verified

    Anneliese Fox-Jones

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Name on report verified

    Childminder Report

  • URN verified

    EY425078

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−1Mixedmore positive than 90% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyhappypositivemake good progresssafecaringstrengthssecure knowledge
Criticismbreachweaknessesineffectivefailscompromisednot robustconcernnot accurate

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings203w+12
  • Leadership136w−61
  • What needs to improve337w+45

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
666
shorter than usual (typical 886)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 47
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 7
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 18%Leadership 12%What needs to improve 30%About the inspection 40%

Full report text

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 20 October 2015 5 October 2011

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement Outcomes for children Requires improvement

p.1

This provision is inadequate

 The childminder does not maintain an accurate daily record of children's attendance, as required, and has not done so for some time. This compromises children's welfare and is also a breach of requirements for the Childcare Register.  Self-evaluation is not robust. The childminder has not completed the required progress check for children between the ages of two and three years. This means she is unable to evaluate their learning and developmental progress effectively and share her findings with their parents.  Although the childminder knows the children well, her observations of children's progress do not provide an accurate picture of how well they are doing. This hinders her ability to effectively plan for the children's next steps in their learning and development.

p.1

It has the following strengths

 The childminder promotes children's understanding of healthy lifestyles and provides caring support for their emotional well-being.  The childminder understands how to support children with their self-help skills to develop their independence. Children are happy and have positive relationships with the childminder and other children. They understand the childminder's behavioural expectations and learn to value others.  The childminder provides children with a varied range of resources and experiences.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To meet the requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage and the Childcare Register the provider must:

p.2

Due Date

 ensure that an accurate daily record of the names of all the children being cared for and their hours of attendance is continuously maintained 30/10/2015

p.2

Due Date

 complete the required written progress check for two-year-old children, highlighting areas in which a child is progressing well and where some additional support might be needed 30/11/2015

p.2

Due Date

 improve the use of observations in order to identify next steps in children's learning to help them make good progress. 06/11/2015

p.2

Due Date

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

Due Date

 develop self-evaluation procedures to monitor strengths and weaknesses in order to ensure that all legal requirements are met and drive continuous improvement.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector observed activities and children at play throughout the inspection.  The inspector spoke to the childminder at appropriate times during the inspection.  The inspector sampled written documentation and a selection of policies and children's records.  The inspector took account of the views of parents through their discussions and their written comments.  The inspector discussed the childminder's self-evaluation processes and plans for improvement.

p.2

Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate

The childminder does not meet all requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage. Safeguarding is ineffective. Although the childminder is vigilant in her supervision of children to help keep them safe, she fails to maintain all records required for the safe and efficient management of the provision. Therefore, children's overall safety is compromised. Nonetheless, the childminder demonstrates a secure knowledge of her responsibility to protect children in her care. She is aware of the signs and symptoms that may cause concern for a child's welfare and knows the correct procedure to follow. The childminder's monitoring of the quality of her provision is not rigorous enough. She does not complete progress checks for children aged between two and three years. The childminder provides a flexible service for parents, which allows for regular discussions about the children's needs.

p.3

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement

The childminder encourages children to explore the range of resources available. She generally observes children's play to support their development. However, she does not make the best use of her assessments. This means that specific learning targets for individual children are not clearly identified to help to consolidate or extend their learning. Nonetheless, the childminder promotes children's language appropriately. For example, she encourages children's interests, asks questions and introduces counting as they observe insects in the garden.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare require improvement

The childminder provides children with a varied range of activities and resources, supporting their development. Children learn to be kind and consider the feelings of others. The childminder encourages good manners at all times. Children develop some understanding about keeping safe, such as crossing the road, when they are out in the local environment. The childminder provides children with resources that reflect people's differences and they celebrate various festivals, which promotes positive attitudes. The childminder promotes hygiene practices well and children learn to attend to their personal care needs. Parents' comments indicate that they are happy with the care provided.

p.3

Outcomes for children require improvement

Overall, the children gain some of the necessary skills for their future learning. They are confident, make choices and socialise with others. Children make suitable progress in their learning and development.

p.3

Setting details

Unique reference number EY425078 Local authority West Berkshire (Newbury) Inspection number 986660 Type of provision Childminder Day care type Childminder Age range of children 1 - 4 Total number of places 4 Number of children on roll 5

p.4

Name of provider

Date of previous inspection 5 October 2011

p.4

Telephone number

The childminder registered in 2011. She lives in Burghfield, Reading. She operates Monday to Friday, all year round. The childminder holds an early years qualification at level 3.

p.4

Telephone number

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the Early Years Foundation Stage.

p.4

Telephone number

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Telephone number

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Telephone number

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.5

Telephone number

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion