Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)

Bright Horizons Canterbury Day Nursery and Preschool

Inspected 25 Sept 2015 · published 23 Oct 2015 · URN EY307211

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    25 Sept 2015

  • Inspectors verified

    Bernadette Gibbs

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Outcomes verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    CT1 1SW

  • Name on report verified

    Spring Lane Day Nursery

  • URN verified

    EY307211

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • OutcomesGood
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+67Positivemore positive than 37% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisemake good progresseffectivehigh expectationsstrongwell-plannedconfidentindependenteffectively
Criticismnot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings469w+55
  • Leadership68w+75
  • What needs to improve62w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
589
about usual (typical 703)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 50
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 41%Leadership 6%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 48%

Full report text

Spring Lane Day Nursery c/o Chaucer Technology School, Spring Lane, Canterbury, Kent, CT1 1SW

p.1

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 25 September 2015 20 January 2012

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Good 2

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good 2

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good 2

p.1

This provision is good

 Staff build on children's interests, understanding and abilities during activities, helping them to become confident, articulate and independent learners. Children make good progress in their learning and development.  Staff generally pay good attention to children's personal, social and emotional development. As a result, children behave well and are kind and considerate to their friends.  Managers and staff reflect well on their practice and set clear targets to drive forward improvements. They consider the views of parents and children when evaluating the nursery provision.  The new manager has high aspirations to improve the quality of provision. She has implemented effective supervision and professional development for staff to improve their knowledge and skills.

p.1

It is not yet outstanding because:

 Babies are sometimes kept waiting at mealtimes, which means that occasionally they are not kept well occupied.  Staff do not always make the most of opportunities to explain to parents how their children are taught and how they can support them further at home.  Staff do not always help children to be independent in managing their personal hygiene. For example, some children find it difficult to reach the soap when washing their hands.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

 review and take steps to improve the organisation of mealtimes in the baby room so that daily routines fully support babies' learning and development  extend opportunities to involve parents more in supporting their children's learning and development  promote children's further independence in managing their personal hygiene.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector viewed all of the nursery rooms and outdoor areas. She observed play and learning activities, and spoke with the staff and children at appropriate times in the playrooms and outdoors.  The inspector conducted joint observations with the manager.  The inspector held meetings with the manager, training manager and staff.  The inspector sampled a range of documents, including children's assessment records, policies and procedures, and staff suitability records.  The inspector spoke with parents on the day of the inspection and took account of their views from recent written questionnaires.

p.2

Effectiveness of the leadership and management is good

The new manager provides strong leadership and is driving improvement effectively. The leadership team monitors children's progress to identify accurate areas for development. The manager sets high expectations for her leadership team to improve staff practice and skills further. Safeguarding is effective. There are thorough recruitment and induction processes. Regular supervision meetings extend the staff's knowledge of safeguarding practices and ensure they remain suitable to work with children.

p.3

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is good

The quality of teaching is good, overall. Staff provide children with good-quality resources and well-planned activities that interest and excite them. For example, babies and toddlers explore a variety of resources using their senses, such as cooking utensils and corks. Staff praise children's efforts and achievements, which boosts their self-esteem and confidence. Older children are supported to develop their interests over time, with a current favourite being insects. For example, they watch spiders spinning their webs and then recreate what they have seen using a range of art materials. Children show a sustained interest and delight in working together. Staff model and extend children's use of language well. For example, they make good use of simple signing and resources to develop children's communication and language skills.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare are good

Staff find out as much as possible about children's needs, such as through home visits and during settling-in periods. This helps them to understand and meet children's and babies' individual needs well, for example, staff understand how to comfort them when needed. Staff communicate well in the nursery and with schools to help children move on to the next stage of their learning. Children learn about others and develop mutual respect. For example, they learn about other people different to themselves.

p.3

Outcomes for children are good

Children make good progress in relation to their starting points. They show high levels of curiosity as they confidently explore and choose toys and activities. Younger children are building close attachments. Older children learn to respect each other and work together preparing them for future learning in school.

p.3

Setting details

Unique reference number EY307211 Local authority Kent Inspection number 827930 Type of provision Full-time provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Age range of children 0 - 8 Total number of places 143 Number of children on roll 121 Name of provider Asquith Court Nurseries Limited Date of previous inspection 20 January 2012 Telephone number 01227 479 696

p.4

Setting details

Spring Lane Day Nursery registered in 2005 and is run by Asquith Nurseries Ltd. It operates from purpose-built premises in the grounds of Chaucer Technology School on the outskirts of Canterbury, Kent. The nursery is open each weekday from 7.30am to 6.30pm for 51 weeks of the year. There are 28 members of staff working directly with the children, most of whom hold appropriate early years qualifications at level 3 or above. The nursery receives funding for free early education for children aged two, three and four years.

p.4

Setting details

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the Early Years Foundation Stage.

p.4

Setting details

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Setting details

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Setting details

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.5

Setting details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion