Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by Ethelbert Specialist Homes Limited in Kent

Inspected 21 Jul 2015 · published 15 Oct 2015 · URN SC023736

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    21 Jul 2015

  • Inspectors verified

    Sophie Wood

  • Helped and protected verified

    Good

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    CT12 5BZ

  • URN verified

    SC023736

Page 4 of 14
Page 4 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Helped and protectedGood

70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,762 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−20Mixedmore positive than 8% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrengthspositivehighly effectiveeffectiveclearimprovedoutstandingconfident
Criticismweaknessesat riskpoorharminadequatevariableconcernslack

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings218w+58
  • What needs to improve1077w−40

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
14
Words of findings
1,287
about usual (typical 1324)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 50
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 4
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 7%What needs to improve 35%About the inspection 57%

Full report text

Good

The children's home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.2

The children's home provision is good because:

 The new manager is quickly becoming established and providing good leadership. He already demonstrates a clear grasp of the strengths and weaknesses of the home. He is confident in his abilities to challenge and implement necessary changes. The area manager worked tirelessly to bridge the management vacancy and has created a blank canvas for the new manager. This is an exciting time.   Young people are increasingly more settled. Peer relationships have significantly improved since the last inspection. A calmer household results in happier young people.   Recent improvements to the furnishing and décor have included the express views and opinions of the young people. This is on-going. Young people are developing a real sense of ownership about their home.   Young people enjoy positive and respectful relationships with the staff. They understand their care plans and why things happen. Such ingredients promote positive outcomes. School attendance has risen, risky behaviours

p.3

The children's home provision is good because:

are decreasing and young people are more positively engaged in their day- to-day care.   Shortfalls identified during this visit include staff induction and supervision processes, specific staff training needs, the variable quality of some staff guidance including risk assessments and the need to review the statement of purpose. 

p.3

Statutory Requirements

This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children's Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the Guide to the children's homes regulations including the quality standards. The registered person(s) must comply with the given timescales.

p.4

Requirement Due date

Ensure that each employee completes an appropriate induction (Regulation 33 (1)(a) 30/10/2015

p.4

Requirement Due date

Keep the statement of purpose under review and, where appropriate, revise it (Regulation 16 (3)(a) 30/10/2015

p.4

Requirement Due date

13: The leadership and management standard

p.4

Requirement Due date

In order to meet the leadership and management standard, with particular regard to the management of epilepsy, the registered person must: (2)(c) ensure that staff have the experience, qualifications and skills to meet the needs of each child. 30/10/2015

p.4

Recommendations

To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):  ensure that staff have the knowledge and skills to recognise and be alert for any signs that might indicate a child is in any way at risk of harm. In particular, ensure that written risk assessments are supported with clear guidance and instruction for staff to implement, in order to minimise presenting risks. (The Guide to the Quality Standards, page 43, paragraph 9.12)

p.4

Recommendations

 ensure systems are in place so that all staff, including the manager, receive supervision of their practice from an appropriately qualified and experienced professional, which allows them to reflect on their practice and the needs of the children assigned to their care. (The Guide to the Quality Standards, page 61, paragraph 13.2)

p.4

Recommendations

 ensure that staff have an understanding of how schools function, including the processes of admissions to schools, the role of designated teachers for looked- after-children and the role of the Virtual School Head. (The Guide to the Quality Standards, page 27, paragraph 5.10)

p.4

Recommendations

 ensure that staff strive to build positive relationships with children and develop a culture of openness and trust that encourages them to be able to tell someone if they have concerns or worries about their safety. In particular, provide staff members with direction and guidance about the key worker role. (The Guide to the Quality Standards, page 43, paragraph 9.11)

p.5

Recommendations

 ensure a workforce plan includes the process for managing and improving poor performance. In particular, provide clarity on managers' use of staff probationary period. (The Guide to the Quality Standards, page 53, paragraph 10.8)

p.5

Information about this children's home

The home is owned by a private organisation. It is registered to provide care and accommodation for up to nine children with emotional and/or behavioural difficulties.

p.6

Recent inspection history

Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement

p.6

Recent inspection history

04/03/2015 CH - Interim sustained effectiveness

p.6

good

Young people have experienced a number of changes since the previous inspection. As a result of some young people moving on, a more settled and better matched group is benefiting from living in a calmer household. The new manager keenly encourages their sense of ownership about their home. This is helping the household to establish its new identity.

p.7

good

Young people are becoming more settled. They speak about ‘caring staff’ and say, ‘they listen to me and help me’. Their guidance clearly influences young peoples’ decisions. They heed this trusted advice and make steady progress with regards to school attendance and their own behaviours. One young person eloquently captures his experience by telling inspectors, ‘I used to be really naughty. I mean bad. But I’m really trying hard and I’m much better about school, my behaviour and that’.

p.7

good

Young people understand why and how certain rules and expectations exist. Individual support plans are well thought-out. They make sense to young people and they choose to engage. One young person says, ‘I have to go to school and not get into trouble. When you keep behaving well, you get rewards. I’m going to get a new scooter.’ In recent months school attendance levels have risen, incidents of challenging behaviours have declined and young people are becoming more tolerant of one another.

p.7

good

Strong links enable the staff team to communicate effectively with their education colleagues. Young people usually attend the organisation’s separately registered school. In such instances, joined up approaches to behaviour management strategies, attendance and supporting the completion of homework are proving effective. However, the staff team currently lacks a wider understanding of the workings of the education system for looked-after-children and therefore, the ways in which they could be even more effective for all of the young people in their care.

p.7

good

Young people receive the support they need to attend health and medical appointments. However, a significant gap in staff training, with particular regards to epilepsy, presents unacceptable risks and a requirement is made to address this shortfall. Young people are making better decisions about their health. Examples include their diets, exercise and lifestyle choices. One young person has requested help to quit smoking and all are becoming more interested in eating healthily. Staff members seek direction from appropriate partners, including therapists and health professionals. This enables them to understand young people’s emotional difficulties and how best to support them. They fully appreciate the complexities of young peoples’ pasts and how these affect their current relationships. Appropriate challenges are made to placing authorities about contact arrangements and decisions which negatively impact upon young people’s emotional well-being.

p.7

good

Young people are appreciative of the improvements being made to the physical appearance and décor of their home. They are currently exploring ideas for the games room. Their views and ideas are valued and implemented. This culture results in very few formal complaints being made by young people. One young person says, ‘I just tell staff if I’m unhappy about something and it gets sorted out.’ Forums such as house meetings and individual key worker sessions seek to obtain young peoples’ views but both are at risk of becoming repetitive in terms of their content. No recent review of these systems has been conducted to assess their value and impact.

p.8

good

Young people are encouraged to undertake activities which appeal to them. A culture of ‘try it’ is successfully engaging them to have a go at something new. An example, such as sea cadets sometimes works or the interest quickly wavers. Staff members say, ‘it’s having a go that counts. Eventually, everyone finds something they enjoy.’ This approach nurtures enquiring minds to explore their wider surroundings.

p.8

good

Naturally occurring activities are used for young people to practise and enhance their self-help and independence skills. In line with their age, understanding and risk factors, young people cook, clean, travel independently and follow their own interests with appropriately reducing input from staff. One young person says, ‘I’m not a kid and I like doing things for myself. It’s good because the staff trust me not to do anything stupid.’ Staff members understand the potential risks around such increased freedom and share these decisions and plans with placing social workers through regular updates and review meetings.

p.8

good

Recent decisive action taken by senior managers has resulted in a better matched group of young people living together. Risks to their individual and collective safety have significantly reduced. Episodes of being missing and engaging in challenging behaviours are declining. This is a particularly notable achievement for one young person. The need to use physical restraint techniques has also declined as challenging behaviours have lessened.

p.8

good

Young people say positive things about their feelings of safety and their sense of general well-being. They say, ‘it’s better here now. I get on with the other boys. They don’t wind me up.’ Another says, ‘we don’t have to always be with each other, it’s good to have your own space.’

p.8

good

Relationships between young people and staff members are strong. Young people speak about individual staff members with warmth and affection. Such relationships are effectively utilised to engage and support individuals through the use of key working meetings and activities. Recent staffing constraints have adversely affected the frequency of these sessions and the written records do not always do justice to the quality and impact of this work. This risks good progress and positive outcomes going unnoticed.

p.9

good

Staff members effectively implement the home’s prescribed safeguarding procedures. Such guidance is routinely reviewed to ensure it remains consistent with local authority and police policies and protocols. Three allegations against staff members have been promptly addressed and where necessary reported to the local authority designated officer. The home demonstrates transparency with its safeguarding partners in the interests of protecting children. The prompt use of suspension protects all concerned and allows rigorous investigation procedures to be implemented.

p.9

good

Individual risk assessments and behaviour management plans are not always clear. Some guidance includes vague language and ambiguous instructions. Examples include use of the internet and how to recognise the significance of behavioural changes. There is a risk of misinterpretation and therefore inconsistent delivery. This is exacerbated by the necessary use of various staff members from other homes within the organisation while a recruitment drive to fill current vacancies is on-going. Irregular and new staff members are not being provided with clear and succinct guidance in order to provide high levels of protection. This puts undue pressure on colleagues who do their utmost to bridge these gaps.

p.9

good

Permanent staff members recognise potential triggers for individuals which could result in unsafe behaviours. In describing one young person, a staff member says, ‘you can predict that certain things will be really difficult for him to cope with, so it would be unfair to let it happen’ and ‘it’s all about de-escalation; don’t let things get to a point of no return. We are working to get him to think about his own responsibilities.’ This approach demonstrates a thorough grasp of the home’s ethos of good behaviour management and encouraging young people to keep safe.

p.9

good

Following the last inspection, damage caused to the property has been rectified. Young people live in a safe physical environment. Swift repairs and renewals of fixtures and fittings complement regular health and safety checks. Senior managers are driving the completion of locality risk assessments. These are conducted through liaison with key agencies, including members of the local safeguarding children board and the police. Thus, the wider, external risks to young peoples’ safety and welfare are considered. This local intelligence helps the home to find ways to reduce potential risks for young people.

p.9

good

Diligent recruitment checks serve to protect the young people from potentially unsafe adults. Senior managers are very receptive to dialogue and debate through the inspection process. An example includes the immediate action taken to further tighten reference verification procedures following one such discussion.

p.10

requires improvement

The manager has only recently been appointed. He has made application to be registered with Ofsted. The manager has suitable qualifications and experience. He is effectively drawing on his social work background and recent period of residential child care work to review the welfare and safeguarding practices of the home. Senior managers are welcoming his fresh perspectives and ideas to enhance and improve safeguarding arrangements.

p.10

requires improvement

Prior to the new manager’s appointment, the home was led by the area manager on an interim basis. Decisive action ended some placements. A calmer environment has been created. The absence of destructive and negative relationships between peers is largely responsible. Lessons have been learnt, particularly in relation to admissions and the need to limit disruptions and or sudden endings. Consequently, the organisation is reviewing its own admissions procedures to reduce the risks of poor matching occurring in the future. The new manager is explicitly clear that placement decisions for this home are his responsibility.

p.10

requires improvement

The staff team are united in their approach to support the new manager. This is an exciting time for the home while it continues to develop. As changes to the staff team and admissions processes undergo transformation, a new and up-to-date statement of purpose is required to reliably inform potential placing authorities.

p.10

requires improvement

Existing staff members possess the Level 3 Diploma in Children and Young People or are working towards it. They benefit from a company training programme which provides a good range and breadth of relevant topics. Safeguarding and child protection training is evolving in response to the changing landscape of risks to young people. Hence, more recent training focuses on child sexual exploitation, internet safety and the role of external safeguarding agencies.

p.10

requires improvement

This wider thinking is not fully captured within staff supervision processes. Although regular, the content of supervision meetings is variable in terms of quality, direction and clarity of recording. This risks a lack of clear direction and under evaluation of staff members’ performance. Their development is difficult to track and there is limited information to explicitly demonstrate the management of good and poor performance, including relevant use of the probationary period. It is therefore difficult for the home to examine its staffing strengths and weaknesses in order to take necessary improvement action.

p.10

requires improvement

New staff members undergo a dedicated and informative induction process but there is no distinction of the differing needs of staff. For example, there is nothing additional within the new manager’s induction programme to demonstrate his additional responsibilities.

p.11

requires improvement

Monitoring systems are evolving. The independent visitor reports are successfully highlighting areas of good practice, as well as the need for improvements. The new manager is receiving clear guidance and instruction on his own monitoring role. He already recognises current strengths and weaknesses. He fully appreciates how robust monitoring systems will assist him in his role.

p.11

What the inspection judgements mean

The experiences and progress of children and young people are at the centre of the inspection. Inspectors will use their professional judgement to determine the weight and significance of their findings in this respect. The judgements included in the report are made against Inspection of children's homes: framework for inspection.

p.12

What the inspection judgements mean

An outstanding children's home provides highly effective services that contribute to significantly improved outcomes for children and young people who need help and protection and care. Their progress exceeds expectations and is sustained over time. A good children's home provides effective services that help, protect and care for children and young people and have their welfare safeguarded and promoted. In a children's home that requires improvement , there are no widespread or serious failures that create or leave children being harmed or at risk of harm. The welfare of looked after children is safeguarded and promoted. Minimum requirements are in place, however, the children's home is not yet delivering good protection, help and care for children and young people. A children's home that is inadequate is providing services where there are widespread or serious failures that create or leave children and young people being

p.12

What the inspection judgements mean

harmed or at risk of harm or result in children looked after not having their welfare safeguarded and promoted.

p.12

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people living in the children's home. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the difference adults make to the lives of children and young people. They read case files, watched how professional staff work with children, young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care given to children and young people. Wherever possible, they talked to children, young people and their families. In addition the inspectors have tried to understand what the children's home knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people who it is trying to help, protect and look after. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the Children's

p.13

Information about this inspection

Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the Guide to the children's homes regulations including the quality standards. the guidance raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted, which is available from Ofsted's website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.13

Information about this inspection

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, workbased learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It inspects services for looked after children and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team,

p.14

Information about this inspection

The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.14

Information about this inspection

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.14

Information about this inspection

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.14

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion