Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Gilbert Scott Primary School

Inspected 18 Jun 2015 · published 9 Sept 2015 · URN 135151

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Natalia Power (lead), Fatiha Maitland

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    18 Jun 2015

  • Inspectors verified

    Fatiha Maitland, Natalia Power

  • Early years verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    CR2 8HD

  • Name on report verified

    Gilbert Scott Primary School

  • URN verified

    135151

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2011.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−5Mixedmore positive than 15% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongmake good progresseffectiveeffectivelyoutstandingconsistentlyrapid progresssafe
Criticismnot alwaysrequires improvementweaknessesnot consistentlynot effectiveinadequateweaknot ambitious

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings908w−20
  • What needs to improve2658w+1

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
3,441
about usual (typical 2806)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 47
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 20%What needs to improve 60%About the inspection 20%

Full report text

School report Gilbert Scott Primary School

p.1

Farnborough Avenue, South Croydon, Surrey, CR2 8HD

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Good 2 This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Leadership and management Require improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Early years provision Requires improvement 3

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a school that requires improvement.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Leaders and governors have not secured consistently good teaching. They have not secured good achievement for all pupils, in particular for the most-able pupils. The school demonstrates only adequate capacity to improve.  Leaders and governors are not rigorous enough in their self-assessment. They do not expect enough of pupils, and are too ready to make allowances for achievement that is not good.  Leaders’ plans for school improvement are not ambitious enough, and do not always get to the heart of what is needed.  Leaders do not manage the quality of teaching with sufficient rigour to ensure that it is consistently good. They do not always ensure that teachers follow up their advice sufficiently well. They do not always focus sharply enough on how well all pupils are learning.  Subject leaders do not always pinpoint the areas of weak progress made by pupils. This does not always help them improve.  Governors do not always robustly hold the school to

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

account for areas in its performance that require improvement.  Teachers do not always expect enough of pupils, particularly the most able.  Teachers do not consistently make sure that the level of challenge meets the needs of all pupils.  Teaching does not consistently lead to pupils making rapid progress, particularly in reading and mathematics.  Achievement requires improvement because proportions making strong progress over the past three years have been below average.  The most-able pupils do not attain highly enough.  The play equipment and materials used by the children in the early years provision are somewhat uninspiring. This slows children’s learning.  The outdoor play spaces in the early years provision are not used successfully to stimulate learning in a wide enough range of skills.

p.1

The school has the following strengths

 There is strong provision for pupils who attend the special classes for those with a range of complex needs. This helps them to make good progress in acquiring skills.  Disabled pupils and those who have additional needs in the mainstream school make good progress in their learning.  Disadvantaged pupils make good progress and generally attain well.  Pupils behave well. Pupils from all backgrounds and heritages are kind to one another and get on well together.  The school keeps pupils safe and helps them to keep themselves safe.  The school is popular with parents and engages well with them.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors visited 18 lessons across a range of subjects to observe pupils’ learning. Five were observed jointly with the headteacher and the deputy headteacher.  Inspectors spoke to a number of pupils, listened to them read and looked at samples of their work. An inspector met a group of pupils to hear how they felt about the school.  Meetings were held with senior and middle leaders, including those who hold responsibility for specific subjects. A meeting was held with the local authority’s school link advisor. A meeting was held with the Chair of the Governing Body, and three other governors. An inspector met the Vice-Chair on a separate occasion.  Inspectors took account of the views of staff in 39 questionnaires.  Inspectors spoke to a number of parents during the inspection, and took account of a survey of parents’ views provided by the school. There were too few responses to Parent View, the online survey, to be

p.2

Information about this inspection

taken into account.  Inspectors observed the school’s work and looked at a range of documents. These included the school’s own views of how well it is doing, its plans for the future and minutes of meetings of the governing body.  Inspectors considered a range of evidence on pupils’ attainment and progress. Inspectors also examined safeguarding information, and records relating to behaviour and safety.

p.2

Inspection team

Natalia Power, Lead Inspector Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 Gilbert Scott Primary is a little smaller than the average-sized primary school.  The proportion of disadvantaged pupils, those supported by pupil premium funding, is higher than average. This government funding is used to support pupils who are eligible for free school meals and children who are looked after by the local authority.  The proportion of pupils who come from minority ethnic heritages is higher than average. A wide variety of heritages are represented in the school. Very few pupils are at an early stage of learning English.  The school incorporates a specialist resource unit, Willow Tree Nursery. This provides for up to six children in the morning sessions and six in the afternoon sessions who have severe and complex needs. The school also incorporates two classes for a total of 15 pupils, referred by the local authority. These pupils, ranging in age from Reception to Year 6, have moderate learning difficulties. They join their mainstream classes in

p.3

Information about this school

the afternoons and for assemblies.  The overall proportion of disabled pupils or those who have special educational needs is higher than average.  The school runs a breakfast club.  The children’s centre on site is inspected separately and did not form part of this inspection.  Children attend the Nursery part time in the morning sessions. Children in Reception attend full time.  The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress at the end of Year 6.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Strengthen the quality of leadership, so that the school is good, by ensuring that leaders and governors:  improve their self-evaluation so that there are no excuses for pupils’ underperformance  plan more effectively for school improvement, so that pupils achieve better  expect higher standards of teaching, so that its quality is consistently good  offer clear next steps to teachers throughout the school on how to improve, and follow it up to make sure the advice improves pupils’ learning  make sure that observations on the quality of teaching focus sharply on how well all pupils are learning  make sure that subject leaders accurately identify what will help pupils make progress in their areas and put effective measures in place to help them  ensure that governors fulfil their obligation to hold the school to account.  Make sure that the teaching leads to pupils making rapid progress, particularly in reading and

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

mathematics throughout the school by:  ensuring that teachers have high expectations of their pupils, particularly the most able  ensuring that the level of challenge is neither too easy for the most-able pupils nor too hard for those who struggle.  Ensure that the early years provision provides high-quality learning opportunities by:  improving the equipment and resources used by the children, so that they have more opportunities to explore new activities and learn a wider range of skills  providing more chances for children to learn language, number and science skills in the outdoor play areas.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.

p.3

The leadership and management require improvement

 Leaders and governors are effective in creating a culture where pupils feel happy and behave well. Leaders and governors are less successful in creating a culture where all aspire towards excellence. They are not ambitious enough in ensuring that teaching is consistently good and that pupils consistently aim high. This is why leadership requires improvement.  Leaders and governors understand that there are weak areas in the school’s performance. However, they do not always expect enough of pupils, and they make too many allowances for teaching that is not good. As a result, pupils’ achievement requires improvement.  The school’s capacity to improve is adequate. Since the last inspection, leaders and governors have secured advances in some areas. Disabled pupils and those with a range of additional needs, both in special classes and in the mainstream, achieve well. Disadvantaged pupils make good progress,

p.4

The leadership and management require improvement

compared with other pupils at the school and with other pupils nationally. However, improvements have not been secured in the achievement of the most-able pupils.  The school’s plans for future improvement are not robust or ambitious enough. They do not target the main areas for school improvement effectively, such as the quality of teaching.  Leaders do not secure consistently good teaching. They do not always provide effective enough advice on how teachers can improve, and neither do they always ensure that teachers work on the suggestions. In their classroom visits they do not focus sharply enough on how well pupils are learning. As a result, pupils are not always helped to do as well as they could.  Subject leaders are not effective enough in raising pupils’ achievement. They do not always identify accurately enough the areas in which pupils need to improve, and therefore cannot always help them

p.4

The leadership and management require improvement

succeed in making progress.  The local authority has identified the school as having vulnerabilities, and has provided support over time. However, this has not had sufficient impact.  Leaders adequately promote equality of opportunity. The school is a happy environment in which those from all backgrounds get on well together. There is no discrimination against anyone. Disabled pupils and those with a range of additional needs get the opportunity to do well in their learning. However, pupils are not always helped to do well.  The school uses the additional funding for disadvantaged pupils successfully. They make good progress, and their attainment matches and sometimes exceeds that of other pupils at the school.  The school makes effective use of the additional sports premium for primary schools. New participants are attracted to such sports as girls’ cricket. Leaders and governors use the money well to ensure that

p.4

The leadership and management require improvement

class teachers know how to carry the skills forward should the funding stop.  The curriculum prepares pupils for the next phase of schooling. There is an appropriate balance of subjects. Pupils acquire adequate skills in literacy and numeracy.  Pupils are prepared well for growing up in modern Britain. The school introduces them to such topics as democracy and the role of the monarchy. An inspector enjoyed seeing Year 6 pupils sitting in a circle discussing how to make informed choices. Pupils made such comments as, ‘smoking is not good for your health,’ and ‘I need to work hard to get good results for my future’. In such ways, pupils learn to understand the complex world in which they live.  The school engages well with parents and is popular with them. Parents told inspectors that the school is a community that supports the whole family. Parents of pupils with a range of additional needs particularly appreciated the school’s support.

p.4

The leadership and management require improvement

 Leaders and governors effectively carry out their statutory obligation to keep pupils safe. Adults who work with children are checked carefully. The school works in effective partnership with a range of external agencies to ensure the safeguarding of pupils.

p.4

The leadership and management require improvement

 The governance of the school:  The governing body is actively engaged in the life of the school. For example, it took the initiative in awarding a governors’ trophy to pupils who make an outstanding contribution. Governors attend ‘special lunches’, in which pupils who have been especially kind to others or who have made other contributions sit at top table with leaders and governors.  Governors have an accurate understanding of how pupils achieve in relation to others nationally. They understand both school and published data. However, they do not use the information well to hold the school to account for weaknesses in pupils’ achievement and leaders’ management of teaching. They share the school’s culture of making too many allowances for pupils’ underperformance. As a result, pupils do not always achieve as well as they could.  Governors visit classes to see the quality of teaching for themselves. However, they accept too readily

p.4

The leadership and management require improvement

the school’s assertion that teaching is consistently good. They do not ask searching enough questions about the link between teaching and weaknesses in pupils’ progress.  Governors do not secure good value for money from the teaching force. They do not ensure that teachers’ movement along the pay scales is linked rigorously enough to pupils’ progress. However, governors know what to do in individual cases where staff underperform, and are ready to tackle any such cases.  Governors carry out their statutory duties to keep pupils safe effectively. They are well trained in safeguarding and in safer recruitment. They walk the site to make sure it is secure.

p.5

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils is good. Pupils from a wide range of heritages and backgrounds learn and play together peaceably. They respect one another. This is because they absorb the school’s positive values. For example, in an assembly, pupils were encouraged by the headteacher to think of ‘fantastic ways’ in which they could make a difference to others. In such ways the school promotes pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development well.  Behaviour is not outstanding, because pupils are not exceptionally eager to learn. On occasion, pupils become restless and lose concentration for a while. This slows their learning.  Pupils are polite and friendly to visitors. They are ready to hold doors open for others. Pupils who spoke to inspectors said that they were not afraid of other pupils, and that behaviour in lessons was generally good.  The nurture group provides effective support to pupils who attend. Staff help individual pupils to learn to

p.5

Behaviour

cope with their emotions by articulating their feelings. This helps them to understand and control their behaviour.  Children in the Willow Tree Nursery enjoy the many exciting activities they are presented with. They behave well and are calm and ready to cooperate with the adults.  Breakfast club provides those who attend with healthy food. Pupils are given a range of activities with a focus on helping them to build their concentration and resilience in seeing tasks through.  A scrutiny of the school’s records of behaviour incidents shows that examples of poor behaviour are few and far between. There have been no exclusions of pupils in the current academic year.  Leaders and external agencies have worked together effectively to improve attendance. It is now average. This is an improvement on previous years.

p.5

Safety

 The school’s work to keep pupils safe and secure is good. The site is secure. Adults who work with children are carefully checked. A scrutiny of safeguarding documents confirms that children are protected well from harm.  Leaders and staff are well trained in child protection issues, such as radicalisation, domestic violence and drug abuse. This enables them to maintain vigilance. There are strong procedures in place to deal with allegations against any adult that might occur.  Pupils confirmed that there are few instances of pupils being unkind to one another. If they have any concerns or worries, they know which adults to turn to.  Pupils are taught to keep themselves safe. They understand possible dangers from using computers and from people they do not know and trust. They know what cyber-bullying means and how to prevent it happening to them. However, they are less clear about what is meant by homophobic bullying and how

p.5

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 Teaching requires improvement because it is not leading to pupils making strong enough progress overall.  Adults do not always have high enough expectations of all the pupils. Too little is expected sometimes, particularly of the most-able pupils. As a result, they make slower progress than they are capable of.  Teachers do not always get the level of challenge right for all groups of pupils. In some cases, the level of challenge is too difficult, leaving some pupils struggling. At other times, it is too easy, so that pupils are not stimulated to try hard.  Adults who work with those who attend classes for their additional needs promote pupils’ learning effectively. There is a high ratio of adults to pupils and this ensures that pupils receive the right amount of support to enable them to make good progress. For example, in one class for pupils of various ages in Key Stage 2, pupils learned to round numbers up or down. The quality of the questioning was effective,

p.5

The quality of teaching requires improvement

and one pupil exclaimed, ‘Oh, I get it now!’ This was typical of pupils’ sense of achievement as they made gains in their learning.  Writing is a relatively strong area of the school’s performance, and this reflects a concerted effort over time to promote good writing across the school. Inspectors saw stimulating examples where pupils were enthused by the tasks and produced high-quality writing. In one Year 5 English lesson, for example, pupils were given the opportunity to write a persuasive letter on a topic they felt strongly about, such as the deforestation of the rain forest. This prompted some well-argued, concise openings to their letters.  The school has a wide range of strategies designed to promote pupils’ reading skills. These include reading to volunteers and even to a dog trained in listening patiently. These strategies have met with some success. However, reading remains a relatively weaker area of the school’s overall performance.

p.6

The quality of teaching requires improvement

Guided reading tasks do not always promote good learning, particularly when groups of pupils are given insufficient guidance on how to improve.  Pupils’ mathematical skills are not promoted consistently well. In one Year 4 mathematics lesson, the teaching ensured that pupils’ misconceptions were quickly corrected and that they were engaged and alert. However, this is not always the case. Pupils sometimes listen to lengthy explanations that do not apply to the task they are doing.  Teaching assistants and support staff are deployed well in special classes for those with a range of additional needs. They know the pupils well and make sure that they are attentive and answer questions well. They help to promote their good learning. In mainstream classes, support staff are not always deployed well. Sometimes they spend quite lengthy periods listening to the class teacher, and are unable to make enough difference to the pupils’ learning.

p.6

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 The marking in pupils’ English and mathematics books helps them to understand where they have gone wrong and how to improve.

p.6

requires improvement

 Achievement requires improvement because the proportion of pupils who make strong progress in reading, writing and mathematics is lower than average. The progress of pupils from the wide range of heritages and backgrounds is lower than average.  The proportion of most-able pupils who attain top grades is lower than average. This holds true for assessments taken at the end of Year 2 and for national tests taken at the end of Year 6. School figures, together with a scrutiny of pupils’ current work throughout the school, confirm that this is continuing. Proportions making strong progress in reading, writing and mathematics are lower than average.  Disadvantaged pupils eligible for support from additional funding make good progress when compared with other pupils nationally. In 2014, for example, all the disadvantaged pupils made expected progress in their learning in writing and mathematics, whereas in the country as a whole, proportions were lower.

p.6

requires improvement

In reading their achievement was similar to the national average.  When it comes to attainment, disadvantaged pupils in Year 6 generally did as well as other pupils in the school in reading, writing and mathematics in 2013 and 2014. Reflecting their lower starting points at the end of Key Stage 1, their attainment was below that of other pupils nationally. They were around a year behind other pupils nationally in 2013 in reading, writing and mathematics. In 2014, gaps were narrowing, and disadvantaged pupils were two terms behind other pupils nationally in reading and mathematics, and a term behind in writing. School figures indicate that gaps are continuing to narrow, particularly in reading and writing.  Disabled pupils and those who have a range of special educational needs achieve well. They make the same or stronger progress than other pupils in the school. This is because the school is alert to their

p.6

requires improvement

needs and provides effective support for them, particularly those who attend special classes within the school.  Through patient teaching and well-planned tasks, children in the Willow Tree Nursery make good progress in acquiring social and language skills.

p.6

requires improvement

 The early years provision requires improvement because play and learning activities are not lively and diverse enough to promote good learning.  The provision is led by a member of staff who does not teach in the Nursery and Reception classes. She works hard to support new members of staff and to plan for improvements in the provision. However, the outcomes are not effective, and this is because senior leaders do not lead and manage the early years provision rigorously enough.  There are examples of strong teaching of language and number skills, particularly in the Nursery. For example, snack time was used effectively to stimulate children’s number skills; adults placed pieces of fruit over numbers written on a sheet of paper and used the numbers to promote number recognition, and assist with simple subtraction. Such good practice, however, is not consistent across the provision. Language and number skills are not taught well enough, particularly in the Reception class.

p.7

requires improvement

 The materials and play resources that the children use are sometimes uninspiring. The school has identified improving resources as a development point in its planning. However, leaders have not acted with sufficient urgency. As a result, children’s curiosity is not stimulated and they learn less eagerly than they ought.  The outdoor play areas are cramped, particularly when shared by children across both classes. There are too few opportunities for children to explore a wide enough range of activities out of doors. For example, they do not have enough chances to learn to read, write or perform simple scientific experiments out in the open.  Children behave well and are ready to share and take turns on the equipment. They play together harmoniously and are kept safe.  Children make adequate progress from starting points that vary but are generally below those typical for their age. When they leave Reception and go into Year 1 their learning remains below that typical for

p.7

requires improvement

their age.  The Willow Tree Nursery, which has its own staff team, and is in a separate part of the building from the mainstream early years provision, is very different. It is a bright, welcoming environment. A huge amount of thought has gone into preparing resources that are inviting and exciting to children with severe and complex needs. Planning is impeccable. Detailed plans, appropriate to each child, ensure that children make strong progress in acquiring social and language skills. Much of the teaching is done through song, dance and rhyme, and this builds children’s vocabulary and helps develop their speech. As a result the children are calm, curious and willing to learn.

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is failing

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.8

School details

Unique reference number 135151 Local authority Croydon Inspection number 461677

p.9

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.9

School details

Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 3–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 234 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Jason Cummings Headteacher Gillian Gandolfo Date of previous school inspection 27 September 2011 Telephone number 020 8657 4722 Fax number 020 8657 9177 Email address admin@gilbertscott.croydon.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.10

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.10

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.10

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion