Other · Ofsted report
Children's Home, Residential special school run by Kedleston (Wings Education) Limited in Westmorland and Furness
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
30 Jun 2015
- Inspectors verified
Gillian Walters
- URN verified
SC048552
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Although the home acted in co-operation with other services to ensure the young people’s earliest return, it delayed in alerting Ofsted to the situation which failed to promote transparency of its operation. p.3
- The two young people expressed remorse for worrying staff and said that they understood that staff cared for them and had been concerned for their safety. p.3
- As a result, a requirement is made for the home to keep Ofsted suitably informed of any future serious incidents that may occur. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 805
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 26 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
This monitoring visit
A monitoring visit was conducted on 30 June 2015 following two notifications received by Ofsted that raised concerns about the effectiveness of the home’s arrangements to keep young people appropriately safe and secure.
p.2
This monitoring visit
The first notification from the home received on 21 June 2015 dealt with the circumstances of two young people leaving the home late at night and then returning, with one young person alleging that she had come to harm during the short period that she had been absent.
p.2
This monitoring visit
The second notification received on 25 June 2015 alerted Ofsted to the situation that two other young people had been missing from the home since 21 June 2015, having spent time with friends in the local community and then failing to return.
p.2
This monitoring visit
This monitoring visit explored staffing arrangements and the vigilance of staff, specifically in relation to the supervision and checks made on young people to determine whether or not the first incident could have been predicted or avoided. The home’s practice and arrangements for dealing with children and young people that are absent or missing were also examined.
p.2
This monitoring visit
Staffing levels were found to be appropriate during that night to meet the needs of the young people in each of the home’s properties. Clear arrangements were in place to make regular checks on young people throughout the night and these were consistently documented, providing a clear picture of activity throughout the night-time period.
p.2
This monitoring visit
The two young people concerned resided in separate bungalows and no indication was provided to suggest that there was a plan for them to leave the home together. One young person had disabled detectors that would have ordinarily alerted staff to a young person leaving the home. An outside window restrictor had also been removed to enable a second young person to leave her bungalow. The restrictor had been returned to its original position, giving the appearance during a routine check that it was intact and consequently, staff did not detect that it had been tampered with.
p.2
This monitoring visit
During the period of time, estimated to be less than an hour, that young people were absent, staff believed that they were settled in their own bedrooms asleep. Once alerted by a member of the public that one young person was believed to have left the home, staff promptly took action to ensure that all young people in residence were present and safe. Staff acted appropriately in involving the police when it was indicated that one young person may have come to harm.
p.2
This monitoring visit
The home has since reviewed some security measures, taking account of what they have learned from this experience. This includes using specialist security screws in restrictors to lessen the likelihood of them being tampered with. Since this incident one bungalow remains unoccupied until a full appraisal and repairs can take place of the door alarm system.
p.2
This monitoring visit
In relation to the second notification, it would appear that the two young people concerned had not planned to absent themselves from the home. Staff went to collect young people from their day out after they had called to say that they had missed their last bus. The young people did not meet with staff as planned and then contacted them to say they did not plan to return.
p.3
This monitoring visit
During the period that these young people were missing the home maintained good communication with both the police and the young people’s families. As young people were keeping in contact with some family members, staff were encouraging messages to be passed to young people to let them know that they were not in any trouble and that they were just concerned for them. Staff actively searched and assisted police in attempting to locate them. They did eventually return of their own accord following a public police appeal, having been missing for a significant number of days. The two young people expressed remorse for worrying staff and said that they understood that staff cared for them and had been concerned for their safety.
p.3
This monitoring visit
Although the home acted in co-operation with other services to ensure the young people’s earliest return, it delayed in alerting Ofsted to the situation which failed to promote transparency of its operation. As a result, a requirement is made for the home to keep Ofsted suitably informed of any future serious incidents that may occur.
p.3
Information about this children's home
This section should outline: The home is registered to accommodate up to 50 children with emotional and behavioural problems It is operated by a private organisation The home is also a registered with Ofsted as a school
p.4
Statutory Requirements
This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children's Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the Guide to the children's homes regulations including the quality standards. The registered person(s) must comply with the given timescales.
p.4
Requirement Due date
40: Notification of a serious event The registered person must notify HMCI and each other relevant person without delay if an incident requiring police involvement occurs in relation to a child which the registered person considers to be serious. (Regulation 40(4)(b)) 31/07/2015
p.4
Information about this inspection
The purpose of this visit was to monitor the action taken and the progress made by the home since their last Ofsted inspection. This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000. the guidance raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted, which is available from Ofsted's website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.5
Information about this inspection
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, workbased learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It inspects services for looked after children and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team,
p.6
Information about this inspection
The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.6
Information about this inspection
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.6
Information about this inspection
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion