Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 22 Jul 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Joan Bonenfant

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Joan Bonenfant

  • Postcode verified

    L26 1UU

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−28Mixedmore positive than 11% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseimprovingclearsuccessfullyeffectiveeffectivelyrobuststronglyaccurate
Criticismweaknessesinadequatepoorlyweakfailednot effectivebelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings314w0
  • Leadership750w−28

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Full report text

Mr Gary Evans Principal Halewood Academy The Avenue Halewood Knowsley Merseyside L26 1UU

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Halewood Academy

Following my visit to your academy on 3 July 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the academy’s recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Halewood Academy

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the academy became subject to special measures following the inspection which took place in April 2015.

p.1

Evidence

During this inspection, meetings were held with you the Principal, the vice-Principal, the Chair of the Governing Body and a member of the governing body’s executive monitoring board, the executive Principal of the Wade Deacon Multi-Academy Trust, an educational consultant, a representative of the local authority, staff and students. I also scrutinised a range of documentation, including schemes of work and information on students’ current attainment and progress. The statement of action and the academy’s improvement plan were evaluated.

p.1

Context

Since the previous inspection, there has been a major restructure of the senior leadership team. In addition, the academy is in the process of joining a local multi- CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566850 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: dmccarrick@cfbt.com academy trust, the Wade Deacon Academy Trust. A number of staff have been put on support plans in order to improve their effectiveness. There has been a review of the use of the pupil premium, which is additional government funding intended to support students who are known to be eligible for free school meals and those looked after by the local authority. A sub-group of the governing body, the executive monitoring board, has been set up in order to challenge the academy more robustly and check up on the academy’s progress in addressing the areas of improvement

p.1

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The judgement of special measures, although greeted with some disappointment, did not come as a surprise to senior leaders as they had themselves judged the overall effectiveness of the academy as inadequate. Indeed, such accurate self- evaluation has enabled senior leaders, including governors, to set in motion a number of appropriate and well-focused initiatives that have already enabled the academy to move forward.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The academy’s improvement plan is a useful tool in guiding the academy on the journey out of special measures, as it has clear milestones and lines of accountability. In addition, it addresses the correct priorities. However, a little further refinement is required as some success criteria and timescales are too vague. As a result, the improvement plan is not as effective as it might be in helping governors to check that the academy is quickly and successfully addressing identified weaknesses.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

As Principal, you have a clear grasp of the strategic direction the academy needs to take and you are ably supported by the incisive vice-Principal; as such, you constitute an effective partnership. However, not all members of the senior leadership team are as capable as you two and this has slowed the academy down in its ability to address urgently the weaknesses identified at the previous inspection. You recognised this and, therefore, conducted a major restructure of the senior leadership team. As a result of this restructure, this team is now much better equipped to drive further improvement.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Governors acknowledge that until quite recently they were unsure of the questions to ask in order to hold the academy’s leaders more effectively to account. As a result of a review of governance commissioned prior to the previous inspection, governors have had training and have reconstituted the governing body. The executive monitoring board, developed in the wake of the previous inspection, has provided much needed leadership in challenging senior leaders. It has shone an unforgiving light on all aspects of the academy’s work and, as such, has been a substantial impetus in accelerating the speed of change.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

In response to the inspection report, the academy commissioned a review by the Wade Deacon Academy Trust into the effectiveness of the use of the pupil premium. The findings of this review will be helpful to the academy in improving the impact of this expenditure in the future. However, this area of the academy’s work has been poorly led in the past and, as a result, disadvantaged students continue to underachieve.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The leadership and management of teaching have been weak up until very recently and have failed to improve quickly the overall quality of teaching. Since the inspection, senior leaders have changed the personnel responsible for this area with effect from September 2015 and the procedures to monitor the quality of teaching have become much more robust. In addition, performance management, which had been used ineffectively in the past, has been sharpened considerably. As a result, teachers are now held to account for their performance much more rigorously than was previously the case.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Students that I spoke to during my visit mentioned that ‘lessons have got harder’ since the inspection and they were also aware that teachers now expect much higher standards of presentation in their work. When I examined students’ books, I found the work to be neatly executed: this demonstrates that students have, in the main, responded favourably to teachers’ higher expectations in this regard.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

According to the information provided by the academy during this monitoring inspection, there have been some improvements to students’ achievement, for example, predictions for the forthcoming GCSE examinations represent an improvement on the previous year’s results. However, rates of progress in both English and mathematics, although improving, remain substantially below those found nationally in both Key Stages 3 and 4.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The academy has benefited from a productive partnership with the Wade Deacon Academy Trust, for example, through the review of the use of the pupil premium. The academy also engages well with the local authority which has provided financial help and has brokered support in improving teaching from an educational consultant.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made:

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The proprietor’s statement of action is fit for purpose. The academy’s improvement plan is fit for purpose.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Having considered all the evidence I strongly recommend that the academy should not appoint newly qualified teachers.

p.4

The quality of leadership and management at the school

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of People Services. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion