Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 17 Jul 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    HU7 4PW

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+64Positivemore positive than 62% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedpositivelyhighly effectivehigh expectationsoutstandingpositivemake good progressstrong
Criticismdisruptionlackbelowlower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,292
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mr Mark Brown Principal Winifred Holtby Academy Midmere Avenue Bransholme Hull HU7 4PW

p.1

Academy, City of Kingston upon Hull

Following my visit to your academy with Janet Lunn HMI on 1 July 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the academy since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Academy, City of Kingston upon Hull

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the academy was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in March 2015. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Academy, City of Kingston upon Hull

Senior leaders are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The academy should take further action to:

p.1

Academy, City of Kingston upon Hull

 ensure rigorous structures are put into place to hold middle leaders to account for their work

p.1

Academy, City of Kingston upon Hull

 plan a cycle of monitoring and evaluation to check the impact of actions taken to address the areas for improvement

p.1

Academy, City of Kingston upon Hull

 increase the challenge provided by governors by:

p.1

Academy, City of Kingston upon Hull

 ensuring the governing body monitor and evaluate the actions taken to address the areas for improvement rigorously

p.1

Academy, City of Kingston upon Hull

 using the opportunities provided by school to-school support to strengthen governance. CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566932 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: hcarnall@cfbt.com

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, meetings were held with you, other senior leaders, members of the governing body and the headteacher of Kelvin Hall School to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. A telephone call was made to an external consultant who works with the academy. The academy improvement plan and other evidence provided by the academy were evaluated. You accompanied me on a learning walk in the academy.

p.2

Context

Since the section 5 inspection both the leadership team and the support staff team have been restructured.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders, ably led by you, have a concise plan which addresses the areas for improvement. The plan includes helpful success criteria and milestones by which leaders and governors can check the impact of actions taken to improve the academy. Although there is a cycle for the collection of progress data, there is not a systematic arrangement for monitoring and evaluating the work of the academy. The senior leadership team have been reorganised so their focus is on strategic leadership and student progress. Assistant principals will line manage middle leaders and hold them to account for their work. This line management structure is at an early stage and the processes for accountability are not in place. It is too soon to judge the impact of the new structure.

p.2

Main findings

Middle leaders have worked with an external consultant on planning learning to help students make good progress. Further training for middle leaders about self- evaluation is planned for September, a number of them will undertake a nationally accredited qualification for middle leaders, and one middle leader is working with a Specialist Leader of Education (SLE). The impact of the work already done is that middle leaders have a greater understanding of their roles and the quality of teaching has improved.

p.2

Main findings

There has been a strong focus on teachers’ planning. Teachers respond to your high expectations that learning in all lessons will be planned, based on data about student’s levels, so students make good or outstanding progress. Students understand this well. Examples of the impact of this were seen in English and mathematics lessons during the learning walk. In one mathematics lesson, Year 10 students were choosing to do the most complex problems because they knew that would help them to make better progress. The most able students are more regularly being challenged to achieve their potential. A group of most able Year 10 students are receiving specific mentoring to boost their progress. As a result, their grades are improving. The quality of teaching is monitored through drop-in visits to lessons, formal lesson observations, and scrutiny of students’ work and review of students’ progress. Robust support plans with clear targets for improvement are in place to help and

p.2

Main findings

challenge teachers whose practice is not good. Consequently, the quality of teaching has improved.

p.3

Main findings

The improvements in the quality of teaching are starting to impact positively on achievement in Years 7 to 10. The academy’s own data show the current Year 10 students are on track to make progress in line with national expectations in English and mathematics when they complete their GCSE courses in 2016. However, data show the attainment in the current Year 11 is lower than that of their peers and the national average in 2014. Year 11 progress in English and mathematics is slightly better than that of the 2014 cohort, but still well below national expectations and the academy’s challenging targets.

p.3

Main findings

Work to develop literacy skills is at an early stage. Staff have received training about teaching spelling and writing. Timetable changes for the autumn term 2015 will provide less-able students with extra literacy lessons. A commercial scheme has been purchased to improve reading ability. Key leaders appointed to lead literacy will start in September 2015. It is too early to see the impact of the work on literacy.

p.3

Main findings

Behaviour has improved. Students of all ages were seen behaving well during the learning walk. The academy has worked hard with a group of younger students who were causing disruption in lessons. Meetings with the students and their parents have had a positive impact. As a result, the group of students identified in the last inspection to lack concentration and behave immaturely has reduced significantly. The impact can be seen in the reduction of the number of students being removed from their lessons. A new behaviour policy will be launched in September.

p.3

Main findings

Governors have reorganised their committee structure so the skills of members of the governing body are better used. Some governors have made visits to the school to see for themselves the impact of the actions taken to address the areas for improvement. However, these visits are informal and not part of a planned cycle of visits. Records of these visits do not share the purpose of the visits and feedback to the governing body meeting is a general observation of what was seen, rather than specifically focussing on an area for improvement. Questions, asked by governors and recorded in the minutes of the governing body meetings, are not probing enough about all the areas of the academy’s work, including the progress of students.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further monitoring inspections and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

You make highly effective use of a variety of external support. Two consultants working with middle and senior leaders have enabled leaders to focus more closely on students’ progress and have more clarity about their strategic roles. You have arranged very helpful school-to-school support with the headteacher of Kelvin Hall School, which is already impacting positively on leadership structures in the academy. Two primary SLEs are working in English and mathematics to improve transition from Year 6 to secondary school. It is too early to judge the impact of this work. A further SLE is working with a middle leader, with positive impact on middle leadership. A National Leader of Education is mentoring you and helping positively with leadership roles such as human resources.

p.4

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for the City of Kingston upon Hull and as below.

p.4

Her Majesty’s Inspector

The letter should be copied to the following:

p.4

Her Majesty’s Inspector

 For academies [ CausingConcern.SCHOOLS@education.gsi.gov.uk ]

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion