Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Portal House School
Summary
Justina Ilochi (lead), Elizabeth Cornish
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
5 Jun 2015
- Inspectors verified
Elizabeth Cornish, Justina Ilochi
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Postcode verified
CT15 6SS
- Name on report verified
Portal House School
- URN verified
119062
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2009.
- OverallGood
- Leadership and managementGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its students’ needs. p.7
- This supports the school’s effective equal opportunities policies well, by ensuring that all students have outstanding opportunities to thrive no matter their complex behaviour p.4
- Students’ attitudes to their lessons are therefore outstanding and they make good progress overall in all subjects; progress in reading is particularly strong. p.5
- As a consequence, students with underlying complex needs, such as autism, thrive and make good progress socially. p.6
- Students supported by additional funding achieve as well, or better, than their peers and have made exceptional progress in reading. p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. p.7
- Teaching is not yet outstanding because a few more-able students are not making enough progress and expectations of what they can achieve are too low. p.1
- The quality of teaching of mathematics and writing is good but not yet outstanding because the activities for more-able students do not always maximise their learning. p.6
- Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. p.7
- Reports on individual students show that serious incidents have reduced drastically since the previous inspection. p.5
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve the progress of more-able students by ensuring that: demanding and challenging end of key stage targets are set for them as soon as they join the school they have more frequent opportunities to practise their writing skills across a wide range of topics teachers allow sufficient opportunities during mathematics lessons for students to solve problems. p.3
- Further improve leadership and management by ensuring that the good systems for checking the quality of teaching, particularly the review of students’ work, have the impact they should on the progress of more able students. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 2,688
- about usual (typical 2966)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Sea Street, St Margaret's-at-Cliffe, Dover, Kent, CT15 6SS
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Good 2 This inspection: Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2 Behaviour and safety of students Outstanding 1 Quality of teaching Good 2 Achievement of students Good 2
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and students
This is a good school. The headteacher, school leaders and governors have worked hard to eliminate weak teaching and support outstanding behaviour. Students have made good progress in all subjects, including communication, English and mathematics. The school enters all its students for a good range of GCSEs and so they are well prepared for the future. Students supported by additional funding achieve as well, or better, than their peers and have made exceptional progress in reading. Reading is taught extremely well across the school. Students with gaps in their education when they join the school become fluent readers in a short space of time. Leaders of subjects continually check the quality of teaching to ensure that teachers and teaching assistants have the knowledge and skills to perform their role. This leads to consistently good teaching and learning in all year groups for most students. Records of students’ progress are robust and
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and students
accurate. Students say they are safe in school. Attendance has steadily improved in the last three years and is now average. The social and communication skills of students with complex needs, including autism, are rapidly improving. This is because teachers, parents and external agencies are working together effectively to support them. Students’ behaviour is exceptionally well managed. As a result, students with complex behaviour difficulties are making outstanding progress in improving their behaviour. Students’ social, moral, cultural and spiritual skills and understanding are developed effectively in all lessons and assemblies. These aspects are the focus of the school’s future planning. Consequently, students respect each other and adults, and develop outstandingly positive attitudes to their learning. Governors understand how well the school is doing. They use effective strategies to make sure
p.1
It is not yet an outstanding school because
Teaching is not yet outstanding because a few more-able students are not making enough progress and expectations of what they can achieve are too low. More-able students are not always given enough opportunities to practise their writing or problem-solving skills in mathematics. Regular checks of the quality of teaching are not yet leading to improved progress for more-able students.
p.1
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed 10 parts of lessons jointly with the headteacher and deputy headteacher. They also visited classrooms to observe planned ‘tutor time’ sessions and discussed the school’s curriculum with senior and middle leaders. The lead inspector had meetings with the Chair of the Governing Body and vice chair, as well as two representatives from the local authority. Further meetings were held with teaching assistants, therapists and support staff. There were no responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View. The lead inspector held telephone interviews with five parents and considered the school’s survey of parents in the last three years. The lead inspector also took account of the opinions of the 26 staff who completed the Ofsted staff questionnaire. The inspection team observed students’ behaviour in lessons and in the playground, had discussions with them and listened to them read.
p.2
Information about this inspection
Inspectors analysed the school’s information on attainment and progress. They looked closely at documentation relating to safeguarding, the school’s evaluation of its performance, its future plans, attendance and behaviour. They also looked at the school’s website.
p.2
Inspection team
Justina Ilochi, Lead inspector Additional inspector
p.2
Information about this school
Portal House School is a special school that caters for secondary-aged students with behavioural, emotional and social difficulties. A significant proportion of students have underlying complex mental and learning needs, including autism. All students have a statement of special education needs. The Chair of the Governing Body and the vice chair were appointed this year. More than half of students did not join the school in Year 7. A significant proportion of students have gaps in their education because they had not attended school for six months to two years prior to their entry to the school. Although designated as mixed, this school has not had girls on its roll in the last five years. Almost all students are from White British backgrounds. More than twice the proportion of students compared to the national average are supported by the pupil premium. This is additional government funding for children who are looked after or who are known to be
p.3
Information about this school
eligible for free school meals. A significant number of students are looked after by the local authority. The school does not use alternative provision.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the progress of more-able students by ensuring that: demanding and challenging end of key stage targets are set for them as soon as they join the school they have more frequent opportunities to practise their writing skills across a wide range of topics teachers allow sufficient opportunities during mathematics lessons for students to solve problems. Further improve leadership and management by ensuring that the good systems for checking the quality of teaching, particularly the review of students’ work, have the impact they should on the progress of more able students.
p.3
The leadership and management are good
The headteacher, supported well by senior and middle leaders and experienced governors, has eliminated weak teaching and encouraged outstanding behaviour. This has ensured rapid improvement to the progress of students in all year groups this year. At the time of the inspection, all students in Year 11 were present for their GCSE examinations; last year, almost half of students were absent. The school has clear and transparent systems for checking staff performance that are linked closely to salary, training and students’ progress. All staff, both teaching and non-teaching, know that they can be rewarded for working hard and achieving results. The ethos around the school is warm and welcoming, staff are well motivated and the quality of teaching is consistently good. The school engages effectively with parents by asking for information and sharing with them the best strategies for teaching their children. Parents spoke about how well they were informed of the school’s
p.4
The leadership and management are good
actions to improve the behaviour of their children. Leaders’ checks on teaching are regular and provide accurate and useful feedback to teachers to help them improve their practice further. They do not, however, take enough account of the progress of more- able students, or identify which students could achieve more. Middle leaders make a strong contribution to the improvements in the school. The headteacher has ensured that all teaching staff who are on higher salaries have additional responsibilities and that they lead on various aspects of the school’s work. This has led to the development of strong teams responsible for significant improvements in the behaviour of students with underlying complex needs. This year, students with social and emotional difficulties, including autism, made outstanding progress in developing their social skills because they benefited from one-to-one attention from the nurture team and therapists.
p.4
The leadership and management are good
The school is involved deeply in sharing best practice with schools within its local community as well as further afield. In the last year staff have led training on strategies to improve the performance of students with complex behavioural difficulties. Leaders keep robust records on a wide range of information about students, including their attainment and progress in all subjects. This has helped the school to plan one-to-one, small-group and a whole- school focus on specific areas of learning to meet students’ needs particularly in reading. For example, the school has used its additional funding for Year 7 students to support their reading when they join the school. As a consequence, almost all students are fluent readers. They make exceptional progress in their reading, and gaps with their mainstream peers are closing rapidly. The school ensures that all students are entered for GCSEs in a wide range of subjects, including English
p.4
The leadership and management are good
and mathematics. Students are given good advice and guided well from Year 9 onwards so that they make good choices for their next steps in education, training or employment. This year all Year 11 students were accepted on courses to continue their education in local colleges. Staff have developed a well-planned calendar that includes activities throughout the year. These support the improvement of students’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural skills. Displays in classrooms and corridors show that students take part in fundraising events for charity and enjoy trips, clubs and societies. They are well prepared for life in modern Britain. The school works closely with external agencies such as Child and Mental Health Services and the police, to ensure that all students are safe. This supports the school’s effective equal opportunities policies well, by ensuring that all students have outstanding opportunities to thrive no matter their complex behaviour
p.4
The leadership and management are good
needs. . School leaders ensure that the additional funding provided for most of its students is managed well and the impact checked often. For example, leaders have used student premium funding over the last three years to employ specialist staff to focus on reading and the development of communication and social skills. Consequently, disadvantaged students have made progress which is similar to, or better than, other students in English and mathematics. All staff have high expectations of the behaviour of students in the school and they make sure students are motivated to reach the very challenging behaviour targets set for them. As a result, the behaviour of students improves rapidly as they pass through the school and is outstanding. The local authority has carried out several short visits to review the school’s systems and processes. More recently they have provided useful support for the school’s future planning by helping to strengthen its
p.4
The leadership and management are good
self-evaluation and recording keeping. This has ensured that the school has remained consistently good. Effective safeguarding procedures meet statutory requirements. School leaders check safeguarding arrangements often and report to the governing body. The governance of the school: The governing body both supports and challenges school leaders well. The Chair and vice chair understand the school’s strengths and weaknesses. Governors are experienced and well trained. They know the key aspects of their role and make sure they receive enough information on the quality of teaching and its impact on students’ progress to make secure judgements. They give appropriate attention to academic performance and the behaviour of students. They have supported and contributed to the headteacher’s clear procedures for checking the performance of teachers by approving salary increases for deserving staff. They visit the school often and observe its activities first-
p.4
The leadership and management are good
hand to ensure money is well spent. Governors know that additional funding is making a difference to identified students because they check the performance of students regularly.
p.5
Behaviour
The behaviour of students is outstanding. Students behave extremely well in the classrooms and around the school. This is because all staff and students are committed to using strategies to reward improving behaviour that were developed over the last three years. As a result, students make exceptional progress in changing their behaviour. Students’ relationships with adults and each other in and out of lessons are cordial; they respond extremely well and show their keenness to learn all the time. Students appreciate the opportunities they are given to show off their outstanding behaviour as ‘senior students’ and to take responsibility for their behaviour. This has contributed to the rapid progress they are making. The school has ensured that all students work in classrooms where the atmosphere is calm and purposeful so they can develop their social skills. For example, students, particularly those who are autistic and have
p.5
Behaviour
other complex medical needs, learn together in special classrooms, supporting the development of outstanding social and emotional skills. Consequently, their behaviour is outstanding. Students learn about other cultures and faiths during their weekly assemblies. They grow in their personal skills and are extremely well prepared for the next stages in their education. Displays of their work in classrooms and around the school confirm this. Processes for recording and checking the behaviour of students are robust and followed consistently by all staff. Reports on individual students show that serious incidents have reduced drastically since the previous inspection.
p.5
Safety
The school’s work to keep students safe and secure is outstanding. Parents, students and staff agree that this is true. Bullying, including cyberbullying and all forms of discrimination, is challenged and never tolerated. Students recognise that there are consequences for negative behaviour and they know that school leaders take prompt action to keep them safe. Students’ attendance has improved rapidly since the previous inspection and is now broadly average. This is because of the school’s effort to work closely with parents and outside agencies to reduce students’ absence. The school’s daily timetable offers three useful planned ‘tutor times’. These sessions give students ample opportunities to discuss their concerns with teachers and other adults in a safe environment. Consequently, students develop exceptional self-confidence and self-esteem and they learn to make the right choices about their safety.
p.5
Safety
Students eat breakfast together when they arrive and talk to each other and adults about the school day ahead. Staff use this time to find out and deal with students’ needs when they arrive. This alerts the school to any issues of safety that might emerge during the day and helps all students who have complex behavioural, emotional and social difficulties to settle quickly for the day ahead.
p.5
The quality of teaching is good
The quality of teaching is consistently good in all year groups. The school has ensured that class teams, made up of teachers and teaching assistants, use information gathered about individual students to support their learning effectively. Students’ attitudes to their lessons are therefore outstanding and they make good progress overall in all subjects; progress in reading is particularly strong. Teachers and teaching assistants are well trained and adept at modifying teaching strategies to meet the needs of students. They develop strong relationships with students and use good questioning skills to encourage them to interact, think and reason well. As a result, students’ communication skills are developing rapidly and have a positive impact on their writing skills, which are improving from low starting points. Transition between key stages is seamless because of the way leaders of subjects have focused on the
p.5
The quality of teaching is good
curriculum and assessment of their subjects. They have high expectations of what students can achieve and ensure exciting and interesting learning opportunities lead to good achievement for most students. The school engages effectively with parents. They record and use what they learn about students to plan activities that match their learning ability. For example, the learning of students with gaps in their reading skills is exceptional. They are extremely well prepared to take their next steps in education. Students’ reading achievement records, as well as their English work books, confirm this. The quality of teaching of mathematics and writing is good but not yet outstanding because the activities for more-able students do not always maximise their learning. For example, teachers do not give more- able students enough opportunities to practise their writing and problem-solving skills in mathematics.
p.6
The quality of teaching is good
This has had an impact on achievement of a few more-able students, particularly in Key Stage 4. They are unable to reach the highest grades at GCSE, including in English and mathematics. The school’s focus on checking the quality of teaching through regular ‘work scrutiny’ has improved teachers’ marking seen in students’ books. Students know about the good progress they are making and what they can do to improve their work without help.
p.6
is good
Students in Key Stages 3 and 4 and in all year groups achieve well as a result of consistently good quality teaching. They overcome gaps in their learning. Students who struggled with reading prior to entry to the school are making outstanding progress and becoming fluent readers. This is because good systems are in place to check students’ starting points accurately when they join the school. They are taught phonics (the links between sounds and letters) skills if necessary. The school sets aside time each day to develop students’ love of reading. Students in Key Stage 4 are also making good progress in most subjects. They have seized every opportunity to obtain GCSEs and equivalent Level 2 qualifications in a range of subjects, such as information and communication technology, science, food technology, design and technology, art, physical education, religious education, English and mathematics. This prepares them well for their
p.6
is good
next steps in education and training, and for apprenticeships. Students make good progress in their social and communication skills in all subjects. They are routinely encouraged to speak up and express their views because teachers recognise that students require these skills. As a consequence, students with underlying complex needs, such as autism, thrive and make good progress socially. Disadvantaged students make similar or better progress compared to other students in the school. The additional funding set aside for them is used appropriately to ensure that the one-to-one and small-group teaching they need supports their learning well. Last year students who are looked after by the local authority made similar good progress to their peers in the school. Parents and carers interviewed by the lead inspector confirmed this view. Students in Year 11 and Year 9 are not set challenging and demanding academic end-of-key-stage
p.6
is good
targets in most subjects, especially English and mathematics. As a result, a few more-able students do not obtain the expected five GCSEs at grades A* to C including English and mathematics that match their ability. More-able students who spoke to the lead inspector commented that sometimes work in lessons was too easy for them.
p.6
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its students’ needs. This ensures that students are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its students’ needs. Students are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is failing
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
to give its students an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.7
School details
Unique reference number 119062 Local authority Kent Inspection number 449482
p.8
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Type of school Secondary School category Community special Age range of students 11–16 Gender of students Mixed Number of students on the school roll 54 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Philip Rankin Headteacher Rose Bradley Date of previous school inspection 1−2 December 2011 Telephone number 01304 853033 Fax number 01304 853526 Email address office@portal-house.kent.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk.
p.8
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.9
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.9
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.9
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion