Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Mechinoh School

Inspected 16 Jun 2015 · published 13 Jul 2015 · URN 105999

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Drew Crawshaw

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    16 Jun 2015

  • Inspectors verified

    Drew Crawshaw

  • Postcode verified

    M7 4HY

  • Name on report verified

    Mechinoh School

  • URN verified

    105999

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−37Criticalmore positive than 9% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseindependenteffectiveconsistentlystrongsafeclearsecureimproved
Criticismnot metweaknessesinadequatepoorunacceptablenot robustnot effectivenot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1554w−58
  • What needs to improve617w+67

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
2,144
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 56%What needs to improve 22%About the inspection 21%

Full report text

Mechinoh School 13 Upper Park Road, Salford, Manchester, M7 4HY

p.1

Context of the inspection

 This inspection was undertaken at the request of the registration authority for independent schools in order to monitor the progress the school has made in implementing its action plan.  The school received a standard inspection in November 2013.  In January 2014, the Department for Education (DfE) formally notified the school that it must respond to the weaknesses identified at that inspection. The school submitted an action plan responding to the weaknesses identified in the inspection in November 2013. This was submitted in the form of a letter to the DfE in February 2014. The evaluation of the plan found that it required improvement with most proposed actions and timescales not being reasonable. The rejection of the action plan was confirmed to the school by the DfE in February 2014.  The school received a standard inspection in November 2014. A progress monitoring inspection was carried out on day 3 of the standard inspection. Standards relating to parts 3, 4 and 5 of

p.1

Context of the inspection

the appropriate Education (Independent School Standards) (England) Regulations 2010, as amended, were not met.  In March 2015 the DfE issued a decision to Mechinoh School to remove the school from the register of independent schools. The school has appealed against the decision.  This progress monitoring inspection was commissioned by the DfE on 22 May 2015 in order to ascertain whether or not the school has rectified the failings and the extent of the progress made. Specific regulations that inspectors were asked to report on were parts 3, 4, 5 and 8 of The Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014.  The school has not submitted an action plan responding to the weaknesses identified in the inspection in November 2014.  One of Her Majesty’s Inspectors was in school for one day in order to conduct the present inspection. The inspector had a background in education including independent schools.

p.1

Main findings

 Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils The inspection of November 2014 found that the school’s leaders had not been robust enough in their attempts to ensure arrangements made to safeguard and promote the welfare of students at the school were strong. Consequently, standards relating to the well-being of students were not met. Leaders’ actions to ensure that students, staff and visitors are safe have not been effective enough since the last inspection. The inspector found that the basement fire escape route remained blocked by a bolted door. Fire evacuation procedures make provision for the basement fire escape door to be opened by an adult in the case of an emergency. This is unacceptable. Leaders are not in a position to guarantee that a teacher will always be present in the basement to open the door for students. Also, one of the bolts is positioned at the top of the door and the other at the bottom,

p.1

Main findings

these could be difficult to find, reach and/or open for some students, especially in an emergency. Leaders acted swiftly, during the inspection, to reinstate a second floor emergency exit route as a means of escape in case of fire on or near the stairs around the first floor. However, this escape Monitoring report: Mechinoh School, 16 June 2015 2 of 7

p.1

Main findings

route has not been recorded in the fire evacuation procedure and staff and students have not been trained in its use. Leaders have reviewed the first aid policy, which previously had a number of omissions. The policy now includes clear guidance on the actions to take if a student is injured or is ill. However, leaders are not in a position to guarantee basic first aid cover at all times because only one member of staff is trained in first aid. Leaders have taken some appropriate steps to improve the welfare, health and safety of the students in the school since the last inspection. Leaders have undertaken, or commissioned, considerable work to rectify many of the faults relating to the maintenance of the grounds and building, identified at the last inspection. The perimeter fence is now secure with an electronic entrance gate through which the entrance of all visitors can be monitored. Where possible, the

p.2

Main findings

school grounds have been tidied and trip hazards removed. External safety lighting has been checked and repaired and in a few cases, such as around the basement fire escape, improved. The school building is much cleaner than at the time of the previous inspection. Cracked windows, along with plastic wall cladding, have been replaced, broken furniture has been removed and the basement floor has been cleaned and is now fit for use as a play area. Leaders have authorised extensive electrical testing and repair which has made electrical systems and appliances safe. Leaders have also sanctioned an extensive review and repair of the fire safety system and equipment. Many additional smoke alarms have been fitted while empty fire extinguishers have been refilled or replaced. A robust fire safety equipment monitoring system has been put in place by leaders. Leaders’ records show that the fire alarm system is tested frequently. These actions are

p.2

Main findings

contributing to the well-being of students. However, the standard relating to the welfare, health and safety of pupils is not met.

p.2

Main findings

 Part 4. Suitability of staff and proprietors The inspection of November 2014 found that leaders had not ensured the suitability of all teachers because checks had not been thorough enough, record keeping was inadequate and the latest guidance in relation to keeping children safe in schools had not been followed systematically. The standard relating to the suitability of staff and proprietors remains unmet. Leaders have not yet taken action to register with the Employer Online Access Service nor have they completed prohibition from teaching checks for each teacher employed at the school. This means that students are inadequately safeguarded because appropriate pre-employment checks are incomplete. Not all of the required pre-employment checks, for example prohibition from teaching checks and qualification checks, have been carried out and recorded in the single central record by leaders. Therefore, the single central record does not meet requirements.

p.2

Main findings

The single central record includes the facility to record all the relevant pre-employment checks along with the dates they were carried out. All teachers working at the school are included in the single central record. Leaders have sought and received retrospective references for all teachers employed at the time of the last inspection. A significant minority of these references are of poor quality because they do not include sufficient detail about teachers’ background, character and skills to enable leaders to make informed judgements about a teacher's suitability to teach. Leaders have introduced a school reference request form. This means that, for example in the case of the teacher most recently employed, leaders receive much more detailed information about the prospective member of staff than they did before the last inspection. Leaders have carried out medical fitness checks on all teachers working at the school. Leaders

p.2

Main findings

have obtained information to satisfy themselves that the contract cleaner has been checked thoroughly by his employers. However, leaders have not included this member of staff on the single central record.  Part 5. Premises of and accommodation at schools The inspection of November 2014 found the school’s provision of changing, washing, showering and toileting facilities for students was inadequate and that maintenance and cleaning standards were poor. This remains the case overall because actions taken by leaders to improve the changing, washing Monitoring report: Mechinoh School, 16 June 2015 3 of 7

p.2

Main findings

and toileting facilities for students have not been effective. Students do not have suitable on-site changing and showering facilities should they need them following a physical education lesson. As reported at the last inspection, the medical room is still not positioned near enough to a suitable toilet. Leaders have taken appropriate action to ensure that all washrooms have an adequate supply of hot and cold running water. Leaders have installed electric water heaters in each washroom used by students. This is an improvement since the last inspection. Leaders have taken appropriate action to clear the disused chemical lab of all chemicals. While the area remains unfit for use by students, as reported at the previous inspection, the risk posed by stored chemicals has been eliminated. All fire escape routes identified by leaders are free from clutter and rubbish such as broken furniture. The school’s electrical supply fuse box has been encased in a locked cupboard and the

p.3

Main findings

gas supply is now housed in a locked room which is free from debris. Leaders use a daily health and safety check list to identify potential maintenance issues and take action to rectify problems. For example, all fire extinguishers have been refilled or replaced and none have been tampered with because of leaders’ increased vigilance.

p.3

Main findings

 Part 8. Quality of leadership and management This standard is not met. Leaders do not take appropriate action to ensure the welfare, health and safety of pupils at the school are secure. Leaders’ checks to ensure the suitability of staff are not robust enough. The premises and accommodation at the school are not adequate because facilities for changing, showering and toileting are not appropriate. Although leaders have taken action to make improvements in Parts 3, 4 and 5 of the regulations, gaps remain in each area.

p.3

Regulations 2014 and associated requirements

The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor ensures that– arrangements are made to safeguard and promote the welfare of pupils at the school; and 7(a)

p.3

Regulations 2014 and associated requirements

such arrangements have regard to any guidance issued by the Secretary of State. 7(b)

p.3

Regulations 2014 and associated requirements

The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor ensures that relevant health and safety laws are complied with by the drawing up and effective implementation of a written health and safety policy. The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor ensures compliance with the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005. The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor ensures that first aid is administered in a timely and competent manner by the drawing up and effective implementation of a written first aid policy. (previously numbered 14) The standard in this paragraph is met if– (previously numbered 19(2)) 18(2) no such person carries out work, or intends to carry out work, at the school in contravention of a prohibition order, an interim prohibition order, or any direction made under section 128 of the 2008 Act or section 142 of the 2002 Act, or any disqualification, prohibition or restriction which takes effect as if

p.3

Regulations 2014 and associated requirements

contained in either such direction; (previously numbered 19(2)(a)) 18(2)(b)

p.3

Regulations 2014 and associated requirements

where appropriate, the person’s qualifications; (previously numbered 18(2)(c)(iv) Monitoring report: Mechinoh School, 16 June 2015 4 of 7

p.3

Regulations 2014 and associated requirements

19(2)(b)(iv) The checks referred to in sub-paragraphs (2)(c) and (except where sub- paragraph (4) applies) (2)(e) must be completed before a person’s appointment. (previously numbered 19(2)) 18(3)

p.4

Regulations 2014 and associated requirements

The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor keeps a register which shows such of the information referred to in sub-paragraphs (3) to (7) as is applicable to the school in question. (previously numbered 22(1)) 21(1)

p.4

Regulations 2014 and associated requirements

The information referred to in this sub-paragraph is– (previously numbered 22(3)) 21(3)

p.4

Regulations 2014 and associated requirements

in relation to each member of staff (“S”) appointed on or after 1st May 2007, whether– (previously numbered 22(3)) 21(3)(a)

p.4

Regulations 2014 and associated requirements

a check was made to establish whether S is subject to any direction made under section 128 of the 2008 Act or section 142 of the 2002 Act or any disqualification, prohibition or restriction which takes effect as if contained in such a direction; (previously numbered 22(3)(b)) 21(3)(a)(iii)

p.4

Regulations 2014 and associated requirements

checks were made to ensure, where appropriate, that S had the relevant qualifications; (previously numbered 22(3)(c)) 21(3)(a)(iv)

p.4

Regulations 2014 and associated requirements

in relation to each member of staff (“S”), whether a check was made to establish whether S is subject to a prohibition order or an interim prohibition order, including the date on which such check was completed. (previously numbered 22(3)(b)) 21(3)(b)

p.4

Regulations 2014 and associated requirements

Subject to sub-paragraph (2), the standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor ensures that–. (previously numbered 23A(1)) 23(1)

p.4

Regulations 2014 and associated requirements

suitable changing accommodation and showers are provided for pupils aged 11 years or over at the start of the school year who receive physical education. (previously numbered 23A(1)(c)) 23(1)(c)

p.4

Regulations 2014 and associated requirements

The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor ensures that suitable accommodation is provided in order to cater for the medical and therapy needs of pupils, including– (previously numbered 23B(1)(a)) 24(1)

p.4

Regulations 2014 and associated requirements

accommodation for the short term care of sick and injured pupils, which includes a washing facility and is near to a toilet facility; and (previously numbered 23B(1)(b)) 24(1)(b)

p.4

Regulations 2014 and associated requirements

The standard about the quality of leadership and management is met if the proprietor ensures that persons with leadership and management responsibilities at the school– 34(1)

p.4

Regulations 2014 and associated requirements

demonstrate good skills and knowledge appropriate to their role so that the independent school standards are met consistently; 34(1)(a)

p.4

Regulations 2014 and associated requirements

fulfil their responsibilities effectively so that the independent school standards are met consistently; and 34(1)(b)

p.4

Regulations 2014 and associated requirements

actively promote the well-being of pupils. 34(1)(c) Monitoring report: Mechinoh School, 16 June 2015 5 of 7

p.4

Inspection team

Drew Crawshaw, Lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.5

Information about this school

 Mechinoh School was opened in 1982 and is situated in Salford, North Manchester. It offers secondary education for up to 73 Orthodox Jewish boys, aged between 11 and 16 years with provision for both religious and secular studies.  There are currently 62 students on roll. There are no students with a statement of special educational needs. A very small number of students speak English as an additional language.  The school aims ‘to provide a comprehensive religious education for its students and to prepare them for entry into yeshivas (Talmudic Colleges) to further their religious education’. In addition, it aims ‘to equip students with the basic skills required for adult life, such as literacy, numeracy and general knowledge whilst placing great emphasis on developing a high standard of ethical behaviour’.  On leaving school, all students continue their education in yeshivas in the United Kingdom.

p.5

Information about this school

Monitoring report: Mechinoh School, 16 June 2015 6 of 7

p.6

School details

Unique reference number 105999 Inspection number 465033 DfE registration number 355/6020 This inspection was conducted at the request of the registration authority for independent schools. It was carried out under section 109(1) and (2) of the Education and Skills Act 2008. Type of school Jewish faith school School status Independent school Age range of pupils 11–16 Gender of pupils Boys Number of pupils on the school roll 62 Number of part time pupils 0 Proprietor Mechinoh School Chair Rabbi M Kupetz Principal Rabbi N Baddiel Date of previous school inspection 25 November 2014 Annual fees (day pupils) Not applicable Telephone number 0161 795 9275 Fax number Not applicable Email address mechinoh@gmail.com Monitoring report: Mechinoh School, 16 June 2015 7 of 7

p.6

School details

guidance 'Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.7

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.7

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.7

School details

inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit

p.7

School details

www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at https://reports.ofsted.gov.uk/user .

p.7

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion