Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)

Storrs Road Pre-School

Inspected 10 Jun 2015 · published 10 Jul 2015 · URN 509209

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    10 Jun 2015

  • Inspectors verified

    Joanne Mary Smith

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    S40 3PY

  • Name on report verified

    Storrs Road Pre-School

  • URN verified

    509209

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.

  • OverallGood
  • Early yearsGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+13Mostly positivemore positive than 3% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisevery wellstrongknowledgeablesecureskilfullyrobustcleareffectively
Criticismat risknot alwaysfalling behindnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings398w+36
  • What needs to improve95w−64

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
480
shorter than usual (typical 703)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 50
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 28%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 65%

Full report text

Storrs Road Pre-School Storrs Road Church Centre, Storrs Road, Chesterfield, Derbyshire, S40 3PY

p.1

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 10 June 2015 30 June 2014

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

Previous inspection: Requires Improvement How well the early years provision meets the needs of the range of children who attend Good 2

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

The contribution of the early years provision to the well-being of children Good 2

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

The effectiveness of the leadership and management of the early years provision Good 2

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

The setting meets legal requirements for early years settings

p.1

This provision is good

 Knowledgeable staff have a secure understanding of how young children learn. They skilfully plan and provide a wide range of interesting and challenging opportunities that support children's all round development.  Children are busy and interested in their play. They concentrate well and become absorbed in what they are doing working hard until they are satisfied with their results.  The manager and committee are a strong team. They have a secure understanding of their roles and responsibilities and together make sure that the pre-school meets the requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage.  There is a good range of relevant policies and procedures, including safeguarding and protecting children's well-being, in place to underpin the work of the pre-school. Staff understand and use these on a daily basis.  Children have a very good understanding of pre-school routines and what staff expect

p.1

This provision is good

from them. They behave very well and have a developing understanding of how to keep themselves and others safe.

p.1

It is not yet outstanding because:

 The development plans and self-evaluation findings do not align as closely as they could to give a sharp focus to improvements.  Staff do not always make the most of opportunities in adult-led activities such as baking, to develop mathematical language and concepts such as sequencing.  Not enough is known about how well different groups of children are making progress.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

 review the different development plans and the setting's self-evaluation to bring about more sharply focused improvement plans  make the most of opportunities in adult-led activities to introduce mathematical language and concepts such as sequencing, for example, by using pictorial recipes when baking  improve how assessment information is used so that the progress of different groups of children is checked and swift action can be taken when a group is identified as being at risk of falling behind developmental expectations.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector observed activities in the nursery room and the outdoor play area.  The inspector spoke to staff and children at appropriate times during the inspection and held a meeting with the manager.  The inspector carried out a joint observation with the manager.  The inspector took account of the views of parents spoken to on the day of the inspection.  The inspector looked at children's records, planning documentation, evidence of the suitability of staff working in the pre-school and a range of other documentation, including policies and procedures.

p.2

who attend. This is good

Staff have a creative and flexible approach to providing learning experiences for children. Throughout the day they respond positively to children's changing interests and needs. They provide equipment and materials that support children to expand their play and ideas, adding items to equipment already provided, or getting equipment out to follow an new line of thinking. Activities are moved or changed to retain or re-ignite children's interest in them. The playdough, for example, started the day as a table top activity and was then moved onto the floor to give children a different experience. Children have many opportunities to explore, reason and be creative. During a baking activity children had the freedom to smell, touch and taste the different ingredients in their cake mixture. Staff also extended this experience by adding water to dry ingredients and asking children about the changes they saw and felt. Across all areas of the provision staff are skilled in how they

p.3

who attend. This is good

ask questions and speak to children. Staff frequently use opportunities to challenge children, so that children have to think, remember and work things out for themselves.

p.3

good

Children and staff have close and trusting relationships. Children approach staff for help and support, and invite staff to join them in their play. A small group of children organised themselves into different roles in the doctor's role play area. They invited staff and other children to visit and become their patients and remained engrossed in the play for several minutes. Routines in the pre-school are well thought through. Within routines children are supported to make positive choices, which they do with increasing confidence as they get older and choose to join in activities, such as circle or story time. Children understand that at times they have to wait their turn, for example to have their snack, and they do this patiently. Positive steps are taken to help children to understand change, and for older children this includes their move to school. Children are emotionally secure at the pre-

p.3

good

school, they are developing good attitudes to learning and they are well prepared for the move to the next phase of their education.

p.3

provision is good

Established and robust systems to check the quality of teaching and learning are in place. All staff, including the manager, are routinely observed when they are working. They have regular opportunities to meet with their supervisor to review their work. These meetings result in clear targets for staff to work towards, to extend or improve their practice. The pre-school has three documents with different improvements identified on them. While some targets are clear and focused others simply identify a continuation in current practice, which will not bring about more rapid improvement to the pre-school. Individual children's progress and staff keyworker groups of children are closely and effectively monitored to identify and children or staff who might need extra support with a particular area of learning. However, the progress of different groups of children, such as boys, who might be at risk of not meeting their developmental milestones is not yet checked.

p.3

Setting details

Unique reference number 509209 Local authority Derbyshire Inspection number 1005599 Type of provision Full-time provision Registration category Childcare - Non-Domestic Age range of children 2 - 5 Total number of places 25 Number of children on roll 42 Name of provider Storrs Road Pre-school Committee Date of previous inspection 30 June 2014 Telephone number 01246566189

p.4

Setting details

Storrs Road Pre-School was registered in 1974. It is situated in the Methodist Church Centre in Chesterfield, Derbyshire. It operates from one room and there is an area available for outdoor play. The pre-school employs six members of childcare staff, all of whom hold appropriate early years qualifications at level 2 and above. The pre-school opens on Monday, Wednesday, Thursday and Friday from 9am until 3pm during term time. The pre-school provides funded early education for two-, three- and four-year-olds.

p.4

Setting details

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the Early Years Foundation Stage.

p.4

Setting details

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Setting details

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.5

Setting details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion