Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)

Leybourne Pre-School

Inspected 17 Jun 2015 · published 8 Jul 2015 · URN EY402175

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    17 Jun 2015

  • Inspectors verified

    Victoria Cheeseman

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    ME19 5QL

  • Name on report verified

    Leybourne Pre-School

  • URN verified

    EY402175

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Early yearsGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+70Very positivemore positive than 44% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongeffectivelyfeel safesafewell supportedrobustindependent
Criticismgaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings266w+70
  • What needs to improve33w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
293
shorter than usual (typical 703)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 50
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
1
typical 2
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 24%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 73%

Full report text

Leybourne Pre-School Village Hall, Little Market Row, Leybourne, WEST MALLING, Kent, ME19 5QL

p.1

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 17 June 2015 26 April 2010

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

Previous inspection: Good 2 How well the early years provision meets the needs of the range of children who attend Good 2

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

The contribution of the early years provision to the well-being of children Good 2

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

The effectiveness of the leadership and management of the early years provision Good 2

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

The setting meets legal requirements for early years settings

p.1

This provision is good

 Children develop self-confidence well and a strong sense of belonging. Staff effectively support all children to become familiar with the daily routines and to feel safe and valued.  Staff support children to be independent in their own self-care. They teach children about how to stay safe in the sun and the importance of healthy lifestyles.  Staff have a good knowledge of safeguarding and they show a strong commitment to keeping children safe.  Staff support children to develop their early writing skills and help them to sound out letters to make words to write.

p.1

It is not yet outstanding because:

 There is a spacious outdoor garden which is well resourced with equipment for children to develop across all areas of learning. However, staff do not display numbers and print outdoors to further enhance children's learning experiences.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

 enhance children's understanding about print and numbers further to help them continue to extend their learning when playing outside.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector observed activities and the quality of teaching both inside and outdoors.  The inspector looked at children's observations and assessment records.  The inspector sampled policies and procedures and saw evidence of the qualifications and suitability of staff.  The inspector took part in a joint observation with the manager.  The inspector spoke to parents on the day of the inspection to gain their views.

p.2

who attend. This is good

The quality of teaching is consistently good. Staff support the different ages of children well and adapt activities to suit their different learning needs. As a result, children make good progress and are well prepared for school. Staff make regular observations and assessments on children to ensure that targeted next steps in learning are identified. Children enjoy a wide range of art activities and staff display children's paintings and creations, which values their efforts. Staff use mathematical language with children, count and play mathematical games. This helps children develop their understanding of the different ways in which numbers can be used. Staff skilfully use story time to teach children how to predict what might happen next and extend their vocabulary. Staff support children well as they learn about how things change over time. Children know that plants need water and sunshine to grow. This helps children learn about the world they

p.3

good

Staff provide a safe and nurturing environment for children and form warm relationships with them. They work in close partnership with parents and carers. Parents comment that the staff are a great team and work hard to ensure that children are happy at pre-school. Staff work with other professionals to support children with additional needs securely. They are good role models to children as they are kind and speak politely. This helps children learn about and develop positive behaviours. Staff support children in making their own choices and praise them when they try and succeed. They help children to develop friendships and support children in becoming confident and independent.

p.3

provision is good

Management has a good understanding of the Early Years Foundation Stage and leads the staff team effectively. As a result, staff are well supported in their roles through regular meetings. They benefit from opportunities to gain qualifications and develop their knowledge through training. This helps staff to develop and improve their practice to support outcomes for children. Management evaluates practice well to identify areas for further improvement. They implement robust recruitment procedures to ensure that suitable staff are employed to work with children. Management tracks the progress of all children. This helps them to monitor the quality of teaching and children's learning experiences to identify any gaps in children's progress.

p.3

Setting details

Unique reference number EY402175 Local authority Kent Inspection number 831159 Type of provision Full-time provision Registration category Childcare - Non-Domestic Age range of children 2 - 5 Total number of places 30 Number of children on roll 81 Name of provider Michele Donna Saunders Date of previous inspection 26 April 2010 Telephone number 07702835171

p.4

Setting details

Leybourne Pre-School re-registered in 2009. It operates from the village hall in Leybourne, Kent. The pre-school opens five days a week during term time from 9.15am until 3pm on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday, and on Thursday from 9.15am until 12 noon. There are eight members of staff who work directly with the children, of whom six hold appropriate early years qualifications. The pre-school is in receipt of funding for free early years education for children aged two, three and four years old.

p.4

Setting details

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the Early Years Foundation Stage.

p.4

Setting details

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Setting details

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.5

Setting details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion