Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 29 Jun 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Stephen McMullan

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Stephen McMullan

  • Postcode verified

    DN22 6SW

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+83Very positivemore positive than 86% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisevery effectivevery wellimprovingeffectiveclearlysecureaccurateprecise

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Full report text

Mr Neil Moore Carr Hill Primary and Nursery School Tiln Lane Retford DN22 6SW

p.1

and Nursery School

Following my visit to your school on 17 June 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

and Nursery School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in March 2015. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

and Nursery School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, meetings were held with you and other senior leaders, members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. The school action plans were evaluated, a number of documents relating to pupils' progress tracking data were seen and the minutes of governing body meetings were reviewed. Pupils’ workbooks were scrutinised and you took me on a tour of the school where we visited all classrooms where pupils were working.

p.1

Context

New leaders for the early years, English and mathematics are in place for next term. One new governor has joined the governing body and a clerk has been employed to take minutes at all meetings of the full governing body and its committees. External Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9166 Direct email : jayne.coleman@serco.com reviews of both the school’s governance and the use of pupil premium funding have taken place.

p.1

Main findings

School leaders and the governing body have acted quickly in response to the last inspection. They have considered each of the areas for improvement identified in the inspection report and made plans to address these.

p.2

Main findings

There is a very detailed post-inspection action plan. This builds upon the school’s existing plans for improvement but brings forward many of the proposed completion dates. The plan clearly identifies what needs to happen, when, and who is responsible. This will assist in holding leaders, other staff and governors to account for the results of their actions.

p.2

Main findings

A number of positions within the school’s leadership team have been changed. The recent appointments of the deputy headteacher and assistant headteacher have strengthened the school’s senior leadership team and its effectiveness in monitoring and improving standards of teaching. New subject leaders in English and mathematics are bringing additional expertise which is being shared across the school and is already having an impact on pupils’ work.

p.2

Main findings

Teachers’ marking of work is increasingly detailed and encourages pupils to respond to challenging comments and questions. Pupils are given time to respond and to make necessary corrections to their work before they start the next piece. However, teachers’ comments are not specific enough to help pupils improve their work further.

p.2

Main findings

There are more opportunities for pupils to use and apply their mathematical knowledge. They are given an increasingly wide range of challenges and investigations which are helping to make sure that their learning is secure and well understood.

p.2

Main findings

Pupils of all ages are improving their comprehension skills. The reading programme which links books to computer-based questions is encouraging pupils to read more and allows teachers to assess each child’s progress very quickly. As a result, the quality of pupils’ vocabulary and their responses to questions about what they have read are improving.

p.2

Main findings

Pupil progress meetings are taking place more often. Leaders and teachers meet more regularly to talk about the progress of each pupil and this has meant that extra support is being re-directed to pupils who need it, more quickly. The achievement of groups such as disabled pupils and those with special education needs, those in receipt of the pupil premium and the most able pupils, are more closely monitored. As a result, there are early signs that rates of progress are increasing. An external review of the school’s use of the pupil premium is underway. This is helping school leaders and governors to make sure that the school is making the best use of this extra funding for children who are disadvantaged. In addition, the school has made links with another local school which has been identified as using this funding very well.

p.2

Main findings

An external review of governance has been completed. This has helped governors to identify what they do well and how they can improve further. As a result of this review, a clerk is now employed to take minutes at all committee meetings as well as meetings of the full governing body. This is ensuring that there is an accurate record of these meetings which shows the effectiveness of governors in holding school leaders to account. Governors’ visits to the school are now recorded more formally and used by the governing body to confirm information and reports provided by school leaders. The governing body is increasingly involved in action planning and has identified individual governors to monitor different aspect of school improvement such as in the early years. This is helping the governing body to be much more precise about the responsibilities and expectations of staff and governors.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further monitoring inspections and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The local authority has supported the school through a very effective education improvement adviser. She has worked with the school leaders and governors to improve the quality of school self-assessment and offers a high degree of challenge to senior leaders to account for their actions. She has also helped the school to link with other schools in the area to share good practice.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Nottinghamshire.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion