Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Esland South Limited in Greenwich
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectors verified
Stella Elliott
- URN verified
SC386134
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated. p.5
- At the interim inspections we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. p.5
- This is in line with the Inspection of children’s homes: framework for inspection. p.5
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 200
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 33, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC386134 Inspector Stella Elliott Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Registered person Esland South Limited Registered person address Unit 1 & 5 Foundry Lane Milford Belper DE56 0RN Responsible individual John Stamp Registered manager POST VACANT Date of last inspection 04/11/2014 2 of 5 Inspection date 25/03/2015
p.1
Previous inspection adequate Enforcement action since last inspection none
p.2
This inspection
This home was judged adequate at the last full inspection. At this interim inspection Ofsted judge that it has sustained effectiveness .
p.2
This inspection
Since the last inspection the deputy manager and her team has sustained an adequate level of effectiveness. The deputy manager has been able to address the six requirements and the five recommendations made with some measure of success, which demonstrates that the manager is able to apply learning from inspections and is committed to developing the home further.
p.2
This inspection
An action plan has been developed to assist in meeting the requirements raised at the last inspection. The Statement of Purpose has been revised to reflect a description of the children's home approach to the monitoring of the children living in the home, and a revised record to measure physical intervention has been implemented. There have been no restraints since the last inspection but the Registered Manager recognises that some physical intervention measures may be necessary in some extreme circumstances. All established staff have been trained in team teach methodology, with the emphasis on de-escalation of behaviours. New members of staff are due to have this training shortly.
p.2
This inspection
The recording for any physical interventions has been strengthened, with a life space interview to be undertaken with the young person involved in an incident, as well as a debriefing session with all involved to ensure the effectiveness of any intervention is fully analysed. The impact of these robust measures will support reflective practice, and keep young people safe.
p.2
This inspection
The repairs to the windows and general refurbishment required to the home have been progressed, and the manager has ensured weekly health and safety checks are carried out to make sure standards are maintained. The Regulation 33 visitor now comments on health and safety issues in her reports, but notes some files were not readily available. This lack of administrative organisation deflects from the work that is taking place to improve the home. At this inspection similar disorganisation was 3 of 5 evident, and the deputy manager recognises the need to improve organisation to ensure appropriate rigour and oversight is clear in all processes.
p.2
This inspection
A locality assessment has been developed, which fully details potential risks related to gang culture and other relevant risks. This is due for review at the end of March and the manager has been liaising with external agencies to ensure all risk factors are fully considered. The lack of response from some agencies has hindered the full compilation of all factors and a recommendation has been raised to underpin the expectation of the manager to vigorously pursue non - responders. The complete assessment will enable appropriate matching of new young people to the home and help protect everyone living there.
p.3
This inspection
Young people living in the home have some positive outcomes. Although missing from home incidents have lessened recently, the potential dangers of these remaining episodes leave young people at risk of harm. Some young people are receiving specialist external therapeutic input, which for one young person has resulted in reduced incidents of self-harm and in becoming calmer.
p.3
This inspection
A variety of activities are arranged and provided for the young people such as; outward bound short breaks, art classes, ice hockey, computer skills and ice skating which serve to and support new opportunities, increased self-esteem as they master new challenges, and being involved in the wider community. One young person has been accessing Esland Adventures, prior to coming to live in the home. The risk assessments and planning for such preparatory provision were not clear and the manager has undertaken to clarify this immediately.
p.3
This inspection
Staff in the home are described by the social worker of one young person as ' very committed and very proactive, the staff are consistent, available and will support [ name] in any activity. Independence planning has been good especially budgeting.' The staff present at the inspection were clearly child focused and experienced, some having specialist skills such as conflict engagement and in mediation.
p.3
This inspection
The deputy manager is described by staff as ' brilliant, a real people person.' The deputy manager has applied to be the Registered Manager of this home and acknowledges there has been a delay in submitting her application , but this has now been rectified.
p.3
This inspection
The deputy manager recognises the strengths and development needs of the home, especially the shortfalls identified relating to staff recruitment. The organisation has now further developed recruitment processes and interview techniques to fully explore the motivation of people applying to work with vulnerable young people. 4 of 5
p.3
Information about this children’s home
This children’s home is owned by a limited company. It provides care for up to five young people who may have emotional and behavioural difficulties.
p.4
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
04/11/2014 Full adequate 10/06/2014 Full adequate 22/11/2013 Interim good progress 28/05/2013 Full good
p.4
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):
p.4
Recommendations
ensure all staff are trained in the use of physical restraint techniques, and that training is recognised in the home's Statement of Purpose (NMS 3.15) ensure the assessment of the location of the home is fully supported by information sourced from relevant external agencies. ( NMS 10.1) Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.4
Recommendations
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.5
What inspection judgements mean
At the interim inspections we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. This is in line with the Inspection of children’s homes: framework for inspection.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The report details the main strengths, any areas for improvement, including any breaches of regulation, and any failure to meet national minimum standards. The judgements included in the report are made against the framework of inspection for children's homes.
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion