Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 22 Jun 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Anthony Sharpe

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Anthony Sharpe

  • Postcode verified

    IP4 3DL

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+34Mostly positivemore positive than 42% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiverapid progressrigorousstronghigh qualityknowledgeableeffectivelyimproved
Criticismpoorpersistent absencelowergapsdeclinenot yetbelowexclusions

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1323w+29
  • What needs to improve127w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,450
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 91%What needs to improve 9%

Full report text

Mr David Hutton Headteacher Northgate High School Sidegate Lane West Ipswich IP4 3DL

p.1

No formal designation monitoring inspection of Northgate High School

Following my visit on 9 June 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the achievement of disadvantaged students.

p.1

No formal designation monitoring inspection of Northgate High School

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for inspecting schools with no formal designation. The inspection was carried out because Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector was concerned about the achievement of disadvantaged students. The inspection also focused on relevant aspects of the quality of leadership and management (including governance) at the school.

p.1

Evidence

I met with you, your leadership team, members of staff, groups of students, parents, the Chair of the Governing Body, and a representative of the local authority. We had the opportunity to scrutinise a summary of the school’s self-evaluation, the school improvement plan, a review of pupil premium expenditure, governors’ minutes, attendance and achievement data, and performance management objectives. I also looked at students’ work, and evidence from the local authority’s monitoring programme

p.1

Context

The school was last inspected in May 2012, when its overall effectiveness was judged to be good. It is much larger than the average secondary school. The proportion of students entitled to free school meals is below average. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T: 0121 679 9156 Direct E: emma.norwood@serco.com

p.1

disadvantaged students

Published results indicate that in 2013 the proportions of disadvantaged students making expected and beyond expected progress were approaching those of other students in the school. However, in 2014 the progress and attainment of these students was lower than that of other students in the school and nationally.

p.2

disadvantaged students

Progress is now accelerating as a result of a concerted approach across the school to improve the achievement of disadvantaged students. In Year 11, gaps in attainment and progress between disadvantaged students and their peers remain but are narrower than for the last Year 11. In Year 10, assessment information indicates that the gap is much narrower. There is no gap in attainment in Years 7 and 8, where disadvantaged students make even more rapid progress than their peers. School leaders have devised plans to ensure that this remains the case as students move through years 9 to 11. Teachers within the school check each other’s assessments to ensure that this progress is accurately tracked, but governors and school leaders would benefit from a wider external perspective on the standards being achieved.

p.2

disadvantaged students

Leaders at all levels, including governors, are knowledgeable about the school’s academic performance, and their self-evaluation of the school’s work is accurate. They responded promptly when the gap in achievement between disadvantaged students and their peers widened in 2014, after a period of improvement. They have made the achievement and attendance of disadvantaged students a priority within the school improvement plan. A separate plan and review of pupil premium funding gives detailed information on proposed and recent expenditure, and an evaluation of the impact on disadvantaged students’ attendance and progress.

p.2

disadvantaged students

School leaders followed the recommendations made at the previous inspection. They now use data effectively across the school to identify where progress has slowed and intervention is required. The leaders of English, mathematics and science are now part of the school’s senior leadership team. This change underpins detailed analysis of the progress being made in these subjects by disadvantaged students, and has led to additional resources being deployed to accelerate their progress. The same tracking information is used to hold leaders and teachers to account for the achievement of disadvantaged students, through appropriate objectives that are set for staff across the school.

p.2

disadvantaged students

Work seen in students’ books and folders across all three key stages demonstrates strong progress for disadvantaged students. Evidence seen during the inspection showed that students take great pride in their work; teachers assess work constructively, and this detailed assessment is then acted upon by students, who make faster progress as a result. Sixth form folders are well organised, and staff monitor their quality on a regular basis. The folders are then valuable resources for revision when students are preparing for examinations. The attendance of disadvantaged students is lower than their peers and lower than other students nationally. The gap in attendance between disadvantaged students and their peers has widened, as the attendance of disadvantaged students has fallen while that of their peers has improved. School leaders have responded by appointing extra staff to increase the capacity of the school to support and challenge poor

p.2

disadvantaged students

attendance, and through a programme which involves daily contact between the school and parents of pupils in the targeted group. Parents value this contact; school staff respond quickly to their queries, and are swift to alert them to any difficulties faced by their children during the school day. As a result, the proportion of disadvantaged students in Key Stage 3 who are persistent absentees is falling and is now closer to the national average.

p.3

disadvantaged students

School leaders have devised effective systems to aid the transition of disadvantaged students from primary to secondary school. Close liaison with teachers of Year 6 pupils in feeder primary schools ensures that staff in this school have detailed information on the strengths and needs of disadvantaged students who join the school in the September of Year 7. The summer school for these students is growing in popularity, and events such as information evenings aimed specifically at the parents of disadvantaged students ensure increasing contact between the school and the families of these students. The result has been an improvement in the attendance of disadvantaged students in Key Stage 3 and a decline in the number of fixed term exclusions.

p.3

disadvantaged students

Staff are proactive and creative in their work to ensure that disadvantaged students have appropriate routes into further education, training or employment. The transition to higher education is also well managed. Sixth form students have a high regard for the guidance they receive, and the proportion of students from disadvantaged backgrounds who are applying for university places, including Oxford and Cambridge, is increasing over time.

p.3

External support

The local authority provides effective support and monitoring of the school’s work to address the underachievement of disadvantaged students. It has confidence in the capacity of school leaders and the strategies that have been put into place, and monitors progress on a termly basis.

p.3

pupils effectively to achieve their potential are:

 Persistent absence of disadvantaged students is falling in Key Stage 3, and the overall attendance of these students is improving.

p.3

pupils effectively to achieve their potential are:

 There is no gap between the achievement of disadvantaged students and their peers in years 7 and 8 compared to KS2 starting points. The achievement of disadvantaged students in these year groups is higher than their peers.  School staff support the parents of disadvantaged students well. The frequent and high quality communication between home and school is having a beneficial impact on behaviour, attendance and achievement.

p.3

pupils effectively to achieve their potential are:

 School leaders have successfully raised the aspirations of sixth form students with regard to applications for higher education. Students are given effective guidance and the number of applications to universities is rising over time.

p.4

disadvantaged pupils effectively to achieve their potential are:

 Current strategies and the additional capacity to reduce persistent absence and to improve the attendance of disadvantaged students have been implemented too recently to show an impact at Key Stage 4.

p.4

disadvantaged pupils effectively to achieve their potential are:

 The more rigorous focus on the achievement of disadvantaged students has not yet proved to be sufficient to fully close the wide gap between disadvantaged students and their peers in Key Stage 4.

p.4

disadvantaged pupils effectively to achieve their potential are:

 The information held by the school on the current achievement of disadvantaged students is not subject to sufficient external scrutiny. This limits school leaders’ knowledge of what disadvantaged students can achieve, and their ability to benefit from best practice elsewhere.

p.4

Priorities for further improvement

 Sustain the current focus of senior and middle leaders on the rigorous monitoring and evaluation of disadvantaged students’ achievement, in order to accelerate the progress of this group of students.

p.4

Priorities for further improvement

 Improve the attendance of disadvantaged students, by making effective use of the extra staff that the school has appointed for this purpose.

p.4

Priorities for further improvement

 Utilise external expertise to confirm the accuracy of school data on the current achievement of disadvantaged students.

p.4

Priorities for further improvement

I am copying this letter to the Director of Children’s Services for Suffolk, to the Secretary of State for Education, and the Chair of the Governing Body. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Her Majesty’s Inspector

 Secretary of State for Education  Chair of the Governing Body  Director of Children’s Services for Suffolk

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion