Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 15 Jun 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Gina White

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Gina White

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+21Mostly positivemore positive than 35% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexceptionallyhigh expectationsclearpositive
Criticismnot alwaysyet to

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings259w0
  • Leadership540w+21

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
799
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 31%Leadership 65%About the inspection 4%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 www.gov.uk/government/org anisations/ofsted Direct T 01695 566933 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: ggleaden@cfbt.com

p.1

Mr Dale Jackson Principal Kingswood Academy Wawne Road Bransholme Kingston Upon Hull HU7 4WR

p.1

Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of Kingswood Academy

Following my visit to your academy on 21 May 2015, with Suzanne Lithgow HMI, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to confirm the outcome and inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the academy's recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of Kingswood Academy

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the academy was judged to have serious weaknesses in January 2015. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During this inspection, meetings were held with the principal, middle leaders, students, the Chair of the Governing Body and a representative of AET, the sponsor. The sponsor's statement of action and the academy's improvement plan were evaluated. A sample of students’ books was reviewed and short focused visits were made to a few lessons.

p.1

Context

There have been significant changes to the senior leadership of the academy. The Principal at the time of the section 5 inspection has left and a new substantive Principal, formerly vice-Principal, has led the academy since the start of the summer term 2015. A vice- Principal has left and two teachers have stepped down from their middle leadership roles. Two teachers have left and existing staff and temporary teachers are covering their classes. Recruitment to these roles is taking place and the academy expects to fill them for September.

p.1

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

Leaders, governors and the academy sponsor are working closely and purposefully together to bring about improvements. This work has led to integrated joint plans being devised. Actions are focused on the areas for improvement following the inspection. Plans are being implemented and are on track to hit the first milestones. Clear roles have been established for governors, academy leaders and the sponsor to review the steps being taken, to take stock and to adapt the extensive programme of training and support in light of these checks. Actions to improve boys’ progress and strategies to support and encourage boys to raise their game are being introduced throughout the academy following recent staff training. Much work has taken place to strengthen systems of accountability. The academy’s expectations of teachers and of middle leaders have been made exceptionally clear in the Kingswood teaching and marking standards. A programme of monitoring by

p.2

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

senior and middle leaders seeks to establish consistency among all staff in implementing these standards.

p.2

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

In discussions with inspectors, students felt that these measures, together with new staff, are starting to make a difference. The more able, older students are enjoying more opportunities to think for themselves, particularly in mathematics and science, although this has yet to translate to increased work in books. Marking and feedback to students are increasingly reflecting the new standards. Some students, particularly older students, know what they are entitled to in terms of feedback about their work. Although students are given positive encouragement by teachers, the next steps to help spur them on to improve their work are not always well enough defined to help them do so.

p.2

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

Academy data show the progress of students in Years 10 and 11 has accelerated more rapidly since the inspection, especially in English and for disadvantaged groups of students in Years 7, 8 and 9. The academy has high expectations of students and the latest predictions show that Year 11 students are increasingly meeting them and their attendance has risen sharply. Discussions during this monitoring inspection found that leaders are keeping a close eye on the progress students make in English and mathematics, although measures of students’ progress in other subjects and year groups, especially in Key Stage 3, do not always take full account of their starting points on entry to the academy. Much work is focussing on moderation of students’ work in order to strengthen teachers’ assessment skills.

p.2

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

Governors are experienced and are increasingly using their specialist expertise, in addition to reports and external reviews, to support the academy and scrutinise the impact that improvement plans are having. Governors recognise a need to delve more deeply, beyond the key performance indicators in headline data, in order to keep the academy’s progress under closer review. For example, minutes from recent meetings show their intent to analyse the impact that training and strategies are having in response to the slower progress of a group of Year 10 students.

p.2

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made:

p.2

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

The academy's improvement plan is fit for purpose

p.2

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

The sponsor's statement of action is fit for purpose I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State and the Chair of the Governing Body. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion