Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by Hampshire County Council in Hampshire

Inspected — · published 10 Jun 2015 · URN SC033174

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Stephen Collett

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectors verified

    Stephen Collett

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    SO23 8ZB

  • URN verified

    SC033174

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−25Mixedmore positive than 20% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseimprovedindependent
Criticismdeclined

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings62w0
  • What needs to improve321w−25

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
379
shorter than usual (typical 1387)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 36, typical 50
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
4
typical 4
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 4%What needs to improve 21%About the inspection 75%

Full report text

Unique reference number SC033174 Inspector Stephen Collett Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home

p.1

Registered person Hampshire County Council Registered person address Hampshire County Council The Castle WINCHESTER Hampshire SO23 8ZB Responsible individual Susan Lomax Registered manager Maria Kathleen Jane Calway-Kennedy Date of last inspection 28/11/2014 2 of 7 Inspection date 12/03/2015

p.1

Previous inspection good Enforcement action since last inspection none

p.2

This inspection

This home was judged good at the last full inspection. At this interim inspection Ofsted judge that it has sustained effectiveness .

p.2

This inspection

At the last full inspection in November 2014 the home was judged to be good for overall effectiveness. One requirement and three recommendations were made in order to further improve practice at the home. During the intervening period the home has sustained this level of overall effectiveness, despite facing a number of challenges.

p.2

This inspection

Young people at the home have a diverse range of needs and some require high levels of staff support and supervision. All the young people have experienced significant disruption in their lives which has impacted negatively on their development, and consequently some of the young people engage in risky and unsafe behaviours. Staff support young people to address these issues and maintain consistent boundaries in an often challenging environment.

p.2

This inspection

The requirement made at the last inspection to review sanctions and ensure they do not solely focus on financial penalties has been met. This review has concluded that for some young people the imposition of financial penalties remains an effective intervention, while other young people now get some choice over what sanction will be imposed. In addition, alternative sanctions have been identified which can be imposed for inappropriate behaviour.

p.2

This inspection

The recommendation relating to young people having their views on sanctions recorded has not been acted upon, and although the home's records indicate that young people are asked to sign when they receive a sanction, the record does not have a section for their views to be recorded.

p.2

This inspection

The use of alarms on bedroom doors has been reviewed, and all young people now have a risk assessment which considers whether this is an appropriate measure. These risk assessments are reviewed and the safety of individual young people is 3 of 7 taken into account when deciding whether bedroom door alarms should be activated.

p.2

This inspection

Although young people are not yet effectively contributing towards staff annual appraisals, the provider is in consultation as to how this might be achieved. The home has recently introduced 'have your say' consultation forms for young people, so that they can express their views on the care they receive. The Deputy Manager at the home explained that the use of these may be expanded so that they become a tool for young people to contribute towards staff annual appraisals.

p.3

This inspection

Young people make reasonable progress at the home and all attend education. For other young people it has been identified that the home will not meet their long term needs, and so progress has been limited. However, during their stay work has been undertaken to ensure that their needs have been comprehensively assessed so that alternative provision can be made. Other young people have seen improvements in family relationships, and in one case this has resulted in plans being made for the young person to return to the care of family.

p.3

This inspection

Young people express mixed views on the quality of care they receive. Some are very positive, while others report that staff do not manage conflict between young people well, impose unfair sanctions and show a lack of compassion for young people who self-harm. However, all young people then went onto describe good qualities that many of the staff have. The deputy manager provided detailed explanations and evidence to show that young people do receive consistent good levels of care. A social worker commented that 'staff go over and above' to meet young people's needs.

p.3

This inspection

Although young people do have opportunities to express their views on the quality of care they receive, the current mechanisms for achieving this - young people's meetings and 'have your say' consultation forms, are not an effective way of ensuring young people feel their views are being heard. Young people are not familiar with how to access an independent advocacy service in order to address the current situation.

p.3

This inspection

Management, staff and young people acknowledge that there are some concerns regarding bullying amongst the residents. There is an anti-bullying development plan in place to address this issue, and a member of staff has been identified to take this forward.

p.3

This inspection

Staff are familiar with the risks young people face when they go missing from the home and take pro-active steps to reduce missing episodes. All young people have missing person risk assessments and staff follow agreed protocols and procedures when young people go missing. Following a young person's return from a missing episode, staff record any information young people might give about the circumstances of the event, but this is not always recorded in sufficient detail, and there are no formally agreed arrangements for conducting independent return home 4 of 7 interviews when young people return.

p.3

This inspection

Management liaise closely with relevant professionals regarding child protection concerns, ensuring these are appropriately investigated. Strategies are also put in place to ensure young people are protected and kept safe from harm. However, there is a shortfall in the standard of record keeping relating to child protection concerns as no running record is kept of actions taken following a young person making a disclosure.

p.4

This inspection

Individual behaviour management strategies are in place for young people which are based on incentives and rewarding positive behaviour. Physical restraint is used as a last resort and in accordance with regulatory guidelines. Staff receive appropriate training to manage these situations. Young people are given the opportunity to discuss these incidents, but are not consistently given the opportunity to have a medical examination following a restraint.

p.4

This inspection

Managers maintain good communication with external agencies to ensure that young people's needs are appropriately assessed and that steps are taken to protect their welfare. Staff feel supported and new staff benefit from undertaking an induction process that prepares them for undertaking direct work with young people. Regular visits take place in accordance with regulation 33 and reports highlight areas for development. However, regulation 34 monitoring reports are not completed within appropriate timescales and submitted to Ofsted.

p.4

This inspection

As a result of this inspection two requirements and four recommendations are made to develop and improve practice at the home. 5 of 7

p.4

Information about this children’s home

This is a local authority children's home that provides care and accommodation for up to five children and young people with emotional and/or behavioural difficulties.

p.5

Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement

28/11/2014 Full good 13/02/2014 Interim inadequate progress 13/06/2013 Full good 29/01/2013 Interim good progress

p.5

Statutory Requirements

This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children's Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The registered person(s) must comply with the given timescales.

p.5

Reg. Requirement Due date

(2001) ensure written records are kept of any allegation of abuse or neglect, and of the action taken in response; specifically, ensure all information relating to an investigation is logged and collated in chronological order (Regulation 16 (2) (d)) 30/04/2015

p.5

Reg. Requirement Due date

(2001) supply to HMCI a report in respect of any review conducted for the purposes of paragraph (1); specifically, ensure monitoring reports are submitted at least once in every 3 months. (Regulation 34 (2)) 30/04/2015

p.5

Recommendations

To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s): 6 of 7  ensure children do not identify bullying as problem at the home (NMS 3.11)  ensure children know their rights to advocacy and how to access an advocate (NMS 1.5)  ensure written records kept by the home when a child goes missing detail the circumstances of the child's return, any reasons given by the child for running away from the home, and any action taken in the light of those reasons; specifically, ensure records are kept of independent return home interviews (NMS 5.10)  ensure that where there has been a physical restraint, children are always given the opportunity to be examined by a registered nurse or medical practitioner. (NMS 3.16) Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.5

Recommendations

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.7

What inspection judgements mean

At the interim inspections we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. This is in line with the Inspection of children’s homes: framework for inspection.

p.7

Information about this inspection

The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.

p.7

Information about this inspection

The report details the main strengths, any areas for improvement, including any breaches of regulation, and any failure to meet national minimum standards. The judgements included in the report are made against the framework of inspection for children's homes.

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion