Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 8 Jun 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

John Daniell

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Daniell

  • Postcode verified

    CM2 9ES

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+31Mostly positivemore positive than 40% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedhigh qualityhighly effectiveeffectiveconsistentlyhigh expectationsstrongimproving
Criticismgapsbelowfalling behinddeclinednot consistentlyloweryet tonot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1304w+28
  • What needs to improve132w+44

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,436
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 35, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 91%What needs to improve 9%

Full report text

Mark Farmer Headteacher Moulsham High School Brian Close Chelmsford CM2 9ES

p.1

No formal designation monitoring inspection of Moulsham High School

Following my visit to your academy on 13 May 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings.

p.1

No formal designation monitoring inspection of Moulsham High School

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for inspecting schools with no formal designation. The inspection was carried out because Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector was concerned about the achievement of disadvantaged students. The inspection focused on the achievement of disadvantaged students and the impact and effectiveness of leaders, including governors, in improving outcomes for this group.

p.1

No formal designation monitoring inspection of Moulsham High School

The academy's safeguarding arrangements meet requirements.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, I held meetings with you and other senior leaders; the governor who oversees the achievement of disadvantaged students and those who are looked after by the local authority; parents and foster parents; groups of students from Key Stages 3, 4, and the sixth form; members of staff responsible for the achievement of disadvantaged students; and a representative from the local authority. I reviewed documents relating to the achievement, behaviour and attendance of disadvantaged students and looked at their books. I also scrutinised the academy’s self-evaluation document and your academy improvement plan. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9169 Direct E: matthew.mitchell@serco.com

p.1

Context

The academy was last inspected in November 2011 when its overall effectiveness was judged as good.

p.2

Context

Most students who attend the academy are of White British heritage. The proportion of disadvantaged students who attend the academy is lower than that found nationally.

p.2

Context

You have recently appointed a new deputy headteacher who is responsible for students’ wellbeing, and a new co-ordinator for the achievement of children who are looked after. A new assistant headteacher has been appointed with effect from September 2015 who will be responsible for the achievement of disadvantaged students. The head of mathematics has recently resigned and a replacement has been secured for September 2015.

p.2

disadvantaged students

The latest published data on the outcomes for disadvantaged students indicate that their achievement was lower than that of similar students nationally, and well below students who are not disadvantaged, particularly in mathematics. Between 2013 and 2014, the gaps in attainment of disadvantaged students in school and other students nationally widened in both English and in mathematics. However, it should be noted that a large proportion of these students joined the academy with low prior attainment in Year 7. In addition, case studies presented for these students indicate that some had complex needs which acted as a barrier to their learning. The internal data shows the gaps to be narrowing over time.

p.2

disadvantaged students

You have adopted a more strategic approach towards meeting the needs of these students and have reviewed and improved your systems for assessing their progress and attainment. The achievement of disadvantaged students features regularly on agendas for meetings between pastoral leaders, subject leaders and senior managers. This helps leaders and managers quickly identify if a student is falling behind and enables them to put suitable support plans in place to ensure these students get back on track.

p.2

disadvantaged students

The achievement of disadvantaged students features highly in the academy’s self- evaluation and strategic planning documentation and you review the impact of improvement initiatives regularly.

p.2

disadvantaged students

Teachers are acutely aware of their responsibility to ensure that the needs of disadvantaged students are met through their teaching. They know which students to target and have identified effective strategies to ensure their progress accelerates as they move up the school. All teachers of Years 10 and 11 are expected to identify effective strategies which help individual students make progress. This information is shared among teachers so that they adopt a common, successful approach is taken to the teaching of disadvantaged students. Teachers provide detailed written feedback to disadvantaged students so they know how to improve their work, but more work is needed to ensure that students give consistently high quality responses to this guidance.

p.2

disadvantaged students

Leaders ensure that the most vulnerable students receive the guidance they need to make a sustainable transition to employment, training or further education at the age of 16. Senior leaders monitor the destinations of school leavers, including those in the sixth form. Disadvantaged students in the sixth form have high self-esteem and many aspire to go to prestigious universities, including Oxford and Cambridge. Your links with the vast majority of primary schools is highly effective which ensures a smooth transition to secondary school. Your summer school, which targets the disadvantaged students at the end of Year 6, is well attended and prepares students well for their secondary school career.

p.3

disadvantaged students

Senior and middle leaders make good use of detailed assessment information to review the progress of disadvantaged students. The pupil premium funding is used well to target bespoke support for individual students. Strategies have included one- to-one support for English and mathematics, including home tuition, the purchasing of additional study materials or equipment, and financial assistance towards educational visits. Evidence from the academy’s assessment data and my scrutiny of students’ books show that gaps in attainment are closing. The gaps in attainment are closing more quickly in English than in mathematics. However, some gains are also being made in mathematics, particularly by students in Key Stage 3.

p.3

disadvantaged students

The governing body shares the high expectations of senior leaders and monitors closely the achievement of disadvantaged students, more so in English and mathematics than in other subjects. The achievement of disadvantaged students is reported on regularly to the governing body and governors ask pertinent questions to ensure that the progress of these students remains a high priority for the academy.

p.3

disadvantaged students

The attendance of disadvantaged students has improved compared to the previous academic year, but remains below that of other students in the academy. However, it compares favourably with similar students nationally, although disadvantaged students in Year 10 attend less well than their peers from other year groups. Similarly, the proportion of disadvantaged students who are excluded for a fixed period of time has declined steadily year on year, but remains below the national average.

p.3

External support

The local authority has maintained strong links with the academy since its conversion to academy status and continues to provide a good degree of support and challenge. The Standards and Excellence Commissioner visits the academy regularly to monitor the academy’s work. Appropriate support and challenge has been provided during these visits which have included a focus on the achievement of disadvantaged students in mathematics. This has resulted in targets being set and subsequent follow-up visits to check on progress. This support has had a positive impact in improving standards.

p.4

disadvantaged pupils effectively to achieve their potential are:

 There is a clear determination to provide high quality education for all students including those who are disadvantaged and those who are looked after.

p.4

disadvantaged pupils effectively to achieve their potential are:

 The achievement of disadvantaged students is central to improvement planning.

p.4

disadvantaged pupils effectively to achieve their potential are:

 Leaders, managers and governors effectively monitor the achievement of disadvantaged students. Interventions to support these students are appropriate and well targeted. Disadvantaged students feel well supported.

p.4

disadvantaged pupils effectively to achieve their potential are:

 Transition, support and guidance are a strength. The summer school for disadvantaged students is well attended and meets students’ needs.

p.4

disadvantaged pupils effectively to achieve their potential are:

 Recent changes to the staffing of maths have improved the quality of teaching and the progress made by students, but have yet to have a marked impact on externally validated outcomes. Key stage 3 data shows significant improvement in closing the gap.

p.4

disadvantaged pupils effectively to achieve their potential are:

 The attendance of disadvantaged students does not yet match that of others in the academy, particularly in Year 10.

p.4

disadvantaged pupils effectively to achieve their potential are:

 Students are not consistently acting on the guidance teachers give them in order to improve their learning

p.4

disadvantaged pupils effectively to achieve their potential are:

 Governors do not have as clear an understanding of how well disadvantaged students achieve in subjects other than English and mathematics.

p.4

Priorities for further improvement

 Ensure students’ achievement in mathematics is at least as good as in English.

p.5

Priorities for further improvement

 Ensure the attendance of disadvantaged students matches that of their peers.

p.5

Priorities for further improvement

 Ensure that disadvantaged students respond to their teachers’ guidance consistently well.

p.5

Priorities for further improvement

 Provide governors with more detailed information on how well disadvantaged students achieve in subjects other than in English and in mathematics.

p.5

Priorities for further improvement

I am copying this letter to the Director of Children’s Services for Essex, to the Secretary of State for Education, the Chair of the Governing Body and the Education Funding Agency. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.5

Her Majesty’s Inspector

The letters should also be copied electronically to:  The relevant Senior HMI  The relevant Regional Director  Each member of the inspection team  Marilyn Mottram HMI ( Marilyn.mottram@ofsted.gov.uk )

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion