Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Lisa Moore
- Postcode verified
SL6 7NQ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes9
“You have set clear and ambitious targets for students’ progress this year.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 835
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Ms Tanya White Headteacher Furze Platt Senior School Furze Platt Road Maidenhead SL6 7NQ
p.1
School
Following my visit to your academy on 8 May 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the academy since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the academy was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in February 2015. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The academy should take further action to:
p.1
School
ensure students use the feedback they are given by teachers effectively to improve their work.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with you, other senior leaders, a group of middle leaders and members of the governing body to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I evaluated a range of documentation including the academy action plan, information relating to the monitoring of teaching and information about students’ progress. You took me on a tour of the academy and we made brief visits to a number of classes where I spoke to students about their work and looked at their books. Tribal Kings Orchard, One Queen Street, Bristol BS2 0HQ T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01173115246 Direct F 01173150430 Direct email : Sara.Whalley@tribalgroup.com
p.1
Main findings
You have acted with determination and focus to tackle the areas for improvement. You have swiftly updated the academy’s improvement plan to show how these priorities will be addressed, who will monitor progress and how and when it will be measured. You have set clear and ambitious targets for students’ progress this year. As a result, staff and governors have a good understanding of what needs to be done and how improvements are going to be made.
p.2
Main findings
You have undertaken the required pupil premium funding (additional government funding) review. You have taken effective action to address the recommendations. Senior leaders have increased the support given to disadvantaged students for English and mathematics, for example with additional revision opportunities and more one to one support. In order to raise aspirations, all disadvantaged students in years 9, 10 and 11 have received individual careers interviews as a matter of priority. Current assessment information shows disadvantaged students in Year 11 are making better progress and are catching up with their classmates.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders have improved the systems for collecting and analysing assessment information so that it is collected more frequently during the year. As a result, students who are in danger of underachieving are identified and given appropriate support more quickly. Middle leaders are reporting more formally to senior leaders about how their departments are tackling this underachievement. This is making teachers more accountable for the progress their students make.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders have worked with the special educational needs coordinator effectively to review the help given to students to improve their reading skills. Support is now rightly targeted more closely to the students who most need it and more time has been made available for teaching assistants to give valuable help to students.
p.2
Main findings
Work in students’ books shows they are receiving more frequent and detailed feedback from their teachers. However, there is inconsistency about how well students respond to these comments to improve their work.
p.2
Main findings
Work continues on the construction of the new gym. Senior leaders have worked effectively with contractors to ensure students are kept at a safe distance from the building site. Senior leaders meet weekly with the contractors to ensure that appropriate safety measures are in place while building work continues.
p.2
Main findings
The governing body has very recently undergone a review, as recommended in the inspection report, but its outcomes have not yet been received. A governor has recently been appointed with specific responsibility for looking at how pupil premium funding is spent and the impact it is having. As a result, governors have a more secure understanding of what the academy is doing to make sure these students make good progress. They are using this knowledge to support and challenge senior leaders effectively about the progress being made.
p.2
External support
The academy draws on a variety of external sources to support its work. For example, an assistant headteacher has visited King Solomon’s School in London to look at how pupil premium funding is deployed. This information is being used effectively to support the acadmey’s planning in Key Stage 3. Local authority advisers have provided valuable support to the English department to develop an effective assessment system and to check assessments made by teachers in the department.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Windsor and Maidenhead, the Education Funding Agency and the Department for Education.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion