Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Ann Debono
- Postcode verified
E11 3HF
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance14
“Leaders acknowledge this weakness.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 777
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 36, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Maureen Okoye Executive Headteacher Acacia Nursery Cecil Road London E11 3HF
p.1
Special measures monitoring inspection of Acacia Nursery
Following my visit to your school on 8 May 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the nursery’s recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Special measures monitoring inspection of Acacia Nursery
The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the nursery became subject to special measures following the inspection which took place in January 2015.
p.1
Evidence
During this inspection, meetings were held with the executive headteacher, senior leaders from Acacia Nursery and Davies Lane School, members of the governing body and representatives of the local authority. Brief visits were made to the classrooms and outdoor learning areas. I reviewed a range of documentation including safeguarding information and a sample of children’s work. The local authority statement of action and the school’s improvement plans were evaluated.
p.1
Context
Since the inspection, there have been significant changes to the nursery. The interim headteacher left following the inspection. The executive headteacher from Davies Lane School, part of a teaching school alliance, took responsibility for the school’s leadership on 23 February. She is supported by senior leaders and specialist leaders in education (SLE) seconded from the Davies Lane and Selwyn School Federation. Three agency nursery officers and one agency teacher left the school. Consultation is underway for Acacia Nursery to join the Davies Lane and Selwyn Schools’ Federation from 1 June 2015. Tribal Kings Orchard, One Queen Street, Bristol BS2 0HQ T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5323 Direct email : suzy.smith@ tribalgroup.com
p.1
The quality of leadership and management at the school
Since 23 February, the executive headteacher and her senior leadership team have initiated significant improvements within a short time. They work closely with staff and parents who have confidence in senior leaders’ ability to bring about the required changes to the nursery.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
Leaders prioritised addressing urgent health and safety concerns to ensure children’s safety. For example, external fencing was repaired, a deep, disused sandpit was removed and unsafe climbing equipment has been decommissioned. The internal and external learning environments have been refurbished. Internal partitions have been taken away to improve staff visibility and supervision. A safeguarding audit to check staff suitability to work with children has been completed. This monitoring inspection confirms that safeguarding meets statutory requirements.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
In addition senior leaders reviewed teaching and learning. This identified adults’ lack of confidence in key areas, notably assessment, planning and behaviour management. Leaders organised individual and whole-school professional development. This included training, co-planning and team teaching using resources and staff expertise from the federation. Initial feedback confirms that this intensive support has improved practice; however, there is still much to do. Brief visits to the provision during the monitoring inspection showed adults meeting children’s needs and interests; however, assessment practice is underdeveloped. Adults do not routinely assess children’s achievement or plan appropriate next steps in their learning. Leaders acknowledge this weakness. A new system to track children’s progress indicates that too many children are not making the progress they should particularly the most able and those who speak English as an additional language.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The school improvement plan clearly links all actions to the priorities identified in the last inspection. It includes appropriate milestones and success criteria to evaluate progress. There is separation of responsibility between the person leading the action and those responsible for monitoring its impact.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
Governors’ strategic function is weak. They acknowledge that they have overseen the school’s rapid decline into special measures and they have been neglectful of children’s health and safety. Since the inspection they have attended training, visited the nursery more frequently and held meetings with parents to seek their views about the proposed hard federation. Governors do not yet fully understand how to fulfil their roles and responsibilities efficiently in monitoring school improvement. The role of the local authority has been pivotal in brokering the leadership of the Davies Lane and Selwyn School Federation which has driven effective improvement to the nursery since it became subject to special measures. The statement of action is focused and refers appropriately to the key issues. The local authority has strengthened the governing body through the addition of experienced governors and by relieving them of their duties for the children’s centre.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made:
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The local authority’s statement of action is fit for purpose.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The school’s improvement plans are fit for purpose.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The school may not appoint newly qualified teachers before the next monitoring inspection.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body, and the Director of Children’s Services for Waltham Forest. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion