Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)

Jack and Jill Pre-School

Inspected 6 May 2015 · published 28 May 2015 · URN 134310

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    6 May 2015

  • Inspectors verified

    Gill Little

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    OX39 4RF

  • Name on report verified

    Jack and Jill Pre-School

  • URN verified

    134310

Page 2 of 5
Page 2 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Early yearsGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+53Positivemore positive than 13% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexcellentstrongpositivevery welloutstandinggood progresseffectivesuccessful
Criticismweaknessesnot alwaysgapsdeclinenot successful

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings383w+51
  • What needs to improve32w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
406
shorter than usual (typical 703)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 50
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
1
typical 2
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 30%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 68%

Full report text

Jack and Jill Pre-School Rear of Mill Lane CP School, Mill Lane, Chinnor, Oxfordshire, OX39 4RF

p.1

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 6 May 2015 16 September 2011

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

Previous inspection: Good 2 How well the early years provision meets the needs of the range of children who attend Good 2

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

The contribution of the early years provision to the well-being of children Good 2

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

The effectiveness of the leadership and management of the early years provision Good 2

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

The setting meets legal requirements for early years settings

p.1

This provision is good

 The staff team is effective in assessing children's progress and identifying gaps in learning. Staff put into place very specific action plans for individuals and groups of children, reviewing these carefully to ensure that children catch up quickly.  Staff are highly proactive in developing partnerships with parents and other settings that children attend. They put into place very successful initiatives to promote excellent levels of continuity in children's care and learning.  Staff create a highly stimulating environment, both indoors and outdoors, on a daily basis, which excites children and challenges their learning.  There is a very strong focus on incorporating early writing into a wide variety of activities. This approach has a very positive impact on children's early literacy development.  Staff offer excellent settling-in procedures for new children and their families so that children are emotionally very well prepared for their pre-school sessions.

p.1

This provision is good

 The quality of teaching is good overall, and sometimes outstanding. As a result, children are making at least good progress in their learning.  The manager provides very good leadership skills, overall. She is very committed to pursuing improvements that have a positive impact on individual children, groups of children, parents and the staff in her team.

p.1

It is not yet outstanding because:

 Staff are not always successful in their organisation of whole group activities to fully capture children's interest, which sometimes results in a decline in behaviour.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

 enhance the organisation of larger group activities so that children engage more effectively in the learning opportunities provided.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector observed activities indoors, in the garden and on an outing within the school grounds.  The inspector completed a joint observation with the manager.  The inspector talked to children, parents, key persons and other staff at appropriate points during the inspection.  The inspector held a meeting with the manager and a representative of the committee.  The inspector took account of a range of documentation, including children's development records, suitability and qualifications of staff, and the pre-school's self- evaluation form.

p.2

who attend. This is good

Staff make excellent use of assessment procedures to ensure that all children are well prepared for school. They are very effective in building on children's interests to fill gaps in their learning. For example, some of the boys decided to dress up as superheroes and used a boat and diving equipment as part of their play. Staff encouraged them very sensitively to make maps and plans using paper and pens, successfully enhancing their literacy skills. Children show high levels of interest during their own initiated play and small group activities. They experimented with modelling dough using a wide variety of kitchen tools to help them learn about technology. Staff ask questions to challenge learning; incorporating mathematical language and using demonstration and explanation to help children make connections. However, on the day of the inspection, children did not respond as well to whole group activities, as they sometimes lost attention with the

p.3

who attend. This is good

activity and became engaged in unwanted behaviour.

p.3

good

Before children start in the pre-school, they are able to attend special settling-in sessions once a week with their parents or carers, for at least a term. This very successful initiative provides an excellent opportunity for new children and their parents to become used to the pre-school environment, routines and staff. It also enables staff to build relationships with children and their parents and begin to make assessments about individual needs. Children develop positive attitudes to healthy lifestyles as they frequently play outdoors and explore the school grounds with staff. They learn about the impact of exercise on their bodies and that healthy foods are good for them. Children show a good understanding of how to play safely, such as negotiating an obstacle course. Despite occasional lapses in behaviour, children play well together and show care and consideration for others.

p.3

provision is good

The management team has a very good understanding of its responsibilities, and fully meets requirements. The manager carries out monthly safeguarding reviews to ensure that there is a high level of awareness of related issues. The staff team has responded well to recommendations from the last inspection. However, there are weaknesses in the organisation of whole group activities. There is a strong drive for improvement as staff carry out and evaluate action plans and innovative ideas continuously. For example, staff have been very proactive in improving partnerships with local schools to enhance continuity for children as they move into reception classes. Staff make the most of training opportunities, cascading ideas to the rest of the team and putting action plans in place to improve their practice.

p.3

Setting details

Unique reference number 134310 Local authority Oxfordshire Inspection number 841055 Type of provision Full-time provision Registration category Childcare - Non-Domestic Age range of children 2 - 5 Total number of places 26 Number of children on roll 41 Name of provider Jack & Jill Pre-School Committee Date of previous inspection 16 September 2011 Telephone number 01844 353630

p.4

Setting details

Jack and Jill Pre-School opened in 1978 and re-registered in 1993. It operates from purpose-built premises within the grounds of Mill Lane School, in Chinnor, Oxfordshire. It is run by a voluntary committee. The pre-school is open on weekdays, during school term times, from 9.15am until 3.30pm, depending on demand. The pre-school receives funding for the provision of free early education for children aged three and four years. The pre- school employs eight staff, of whom seven hold relevant qualifications. The manager has attained Early Years Professional Status.

p.4

Setting details

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the Early Years Foundation Stage.

p.4

Setting details

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Setting details

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.5

Setting details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion