Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 21 May 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Peter Limm

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Peter Limm

  • Postcode verified

    SN12 7ED

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+35Positivemore positive than 42% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiserigorousextremelypositivelyimprovingpositiverobusteffectivelyaccurate
Criticismweaknessesslow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings143w0
  • Leadership486w+35

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
627
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 22%Leadership 74%About the inspection 5%

Full report text

Mrs N Henderson River Mead School Lowbourne Melksham SN12 7ED

p.1

Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of River Mead School

Following my visit to your school on 29 April 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the outcome and inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of River Mead School

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses in January 2015. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of River Mead School

During this inspection, meetings were held with the Head of School, the Executive Headteacher (and representative of the Mead Academy Trust), the Chair of the Governing Body, a representative of the local authority, the lead teacher for vulnerable pupils and the Head of Inclusion. The sponsor’s statement of action and the school’s action plans were evaluated.

p.1

Context

Since the section 5 inspection, there have been no changes of staff.

p.1

The quality of leadership and management at the school

In a short space of time since the inspection, the head of school and executive headteacher are responding very positively to the challenge of improving those areas identified as weaknesses. They are strengthening practices that were beginning to have a positive impact prior to the inspection. They are introducing a number of rigorous and robust initiatives to ensure that improvement plans are focused tightly on those aspects that require most rapid change. The plans helpfully link to challenging, but realistic, priorities for improving achievement. There is a detailed Tribal Kings Orchard, One Queen Street, Bristol BS2 0HQ T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01173115246 Direct F 01173150430 Direct email :Sara.Whalley@Tribalgroup.com record of actions to be taken, both to implement required changes and to assess how well they work. The staff are beginning to support the changes enthusiastically

p.1

The quality of leadership and management at the school

and well. In this process, extremely good support is provided by the sponsor Trust and local authority improvement advisers.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

One consequence of these initiatives has been an improvement in the rate of progress made by pupils, especially in the early years and those who have better support for their learning difficulties and disabilities. The ‘Reading Rockets’ programme for pupils in Years 2 and 4 is helping to accelerate their reading skills, especially in Years 2 and 4. Pupils who have made slow progress in mathematics in the past are now developing their skills more quickly and with greater confidence.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Subject leaders are beginning to analyse information about pupils’ progress more carefully so that teacher assessments are more accurate. In addition, teachers use their findings to plan lessons that match the learning needs of pupils more appropriately. There is good teaching in a number of year groups and this is beginning to be shared well across all groups. All teaching assistants are involved more effectively to support learning.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The governing body is very aware of the changes taking place and is now asking appropriately rigorous questions about the impact of new initiatives on pupils’ achievement. It contributes well to action planning and makes regular visits to classrooms to survey progress in the quality of teaching and learning.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Understandably, much of the improvement work is in its infancy and there has not been sufficient time for leaders to demonstrate that the initiatives are bringing about the required improvements over time. However, there has been a very encouraging beginning in remedying the weaknesses identified in the last inspection.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made:

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school’s action plans are fit for purpose.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The sponsor’s statement of action is fit for purpose.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the local Governing Body, the Academies Advisers Unit at the Department for Education, the Chair of Directors of the Mead Academy Trust, and the Director of Children’s Services for Wiltshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion