Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 21 May 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Deborah James

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Deborah James

  • Postcode verified

    ST2 0GA

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−17Mixedmore positive than 16% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovingkeenrobustsecure
Criticisminadequaterequires improvementnot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings195w0
  • Leadership508w−17

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
703
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 37, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 27%Leadership 69%About the inspection 4%

Full report text

Mr John Patino Headteacher The Discovery Academy Discovery Drive Stoke-on-Trent ST2 0GA

p.1

Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of The Discovery Academy

Following my visit to your academy on 29 April 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the outcome and inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the academy’s most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of The Discovery Academy

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the academy was judged to have serious weaknesses in January 2015. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During this inspection, meetings were held with the Principal, senior leaders, students and the vice-Chair of the Governing Body who is also a representative of the sponsor. Short visits to a small number of lessons were undertaken. The sponsor’s statement of action and the academy improvement plan were evaluated. Recent tracking data, an externally commissioned pupil premium review and impact statements produced by senior leaders were also reviewed.

p.1

Context

Since the last inspection a new leadership team is in place in the mathematics department. CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566937 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email :jsimmons@cfbt.com

p.1

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The sponsor’s statement of action and the academy action plan have been produced as a single document. Senior leaders and governors were keen to instil a sense of urgency following the inspection and ensure that action was taken quickly and decisively. As a result, the great majority of planned actions take place in a short period immediately following the inspection. There is little information in the plan on what specific actions will be taken in the next academic year. This needs to be addressed by the sponsor, the governing body and senior leaders as a matter of urgency to ensure that actions are distributed evenly through next year and all priorities are addressed fully.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The statement of action suggests that the improvement plan will be shared with parents on the academy website. However, it is difficult to find and does not give parents an opportunity to comment on the priorities.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The Principal and senior leaders have made good use of the outcomes of the inspection to set out a secure strategy for improvement. Key actions are focused on improving achievement (particularly in mathematics and for disadvantaged students), improving teaching and learning and improving attendance and behaviour. As a result of sharply targeted interventions, some improvements are already evident. For example, there has been an improvement in attendance in the spring term and the proportion of teaching that is inadequate or requires improvement is reducing. However, planned actions are still overwhelmingly focused on catch-up activities for existing Year 11 students. Senior leaders understand that they now need to focus the plan on getting things right first time for all students and reduce the reliance on intervention in Year 11.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Governors are working closely with senior leaders to monitor the effectiveness of improvement activity. Governors meet fortnightly with the staff responsible for delivering the action plan through the Governors’ Executive Board. At these meetings governors ask senior leaders challenging questions about their work. Success criteria have been identified for each of the key priorities in the improvement plan. However, these criteria are not always easily measureable and this makes it harder for governors to track and monitor the impact of improvement activities.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Academy leaders are keen to ensure that there is external validation of their work. An external review of the pupil premium (additional government money) has already been carried out and staff are beginning to implement the recommendations. A teaching and learning review is currently under way to check that the judgements of senior leaders are robust. Students’ work in English and mathematics is moderated by teachers from other schools. Governors have secured additional support for the school, including consultant support for mathematics, staff training and support from expert teachers from other schools.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Following the monitoring inspection the following judgement was made:

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The combined sponsor’s statement of action and academy improvement plan is fit for purpose.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Stoke-on-Trent. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion