Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 21 May 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Elizabeth Farr

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Elizabeth Farr

  • Postcode verified

    RG7 1JB

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+48Positivemore positive than 49% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyimprovingclearambitiouseffectiveenjoylovewell supported
Criticismnot alwaysinconsistencylimitedbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
1,014
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mrs Sharon Finn Headteacher Lambs Lane Primary School Back Lane Spencer's Wood Reading Berkshire RG7 1JB

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 29 April 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in February 2015. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. At its previous section 5 inspection the school was also judged to require improvement.

p.1

School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

School

 ensure the checks on teaching and progress which leaders make are sharply focused on how well pupils are learning.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, I met with you, three members of the governing body, including the Chair, and a representative from the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I evaluated the school’s action plan. In addition, I scrutinised other school documentation, including records of leaders’ monitoring activities. I Tribal Kings Orchard, One Queen Street, Bristol BS2 0HQ T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01173115246 Direct F 01173150430 Direct email :Sara.Whalley@Tribalgroup.com joined you on a tour of the school and visited every class, taking the opportunity to talk to pupils about their learning.

p.1

Context

Since the previous inspection the Chair of Governors has left. A National Leader of Governance now chairs the governing body. There are currently three governor vacancies. Plans to fill these are well developed. A teacher with responsibility for a class of Year 3 and 4 pupils is retiring at the end of term. Two other teachers are due to begin planned absences, one at the end of term and one at the beginning of the autumn term. The school is currently advertising these temporary posts.

p.2

Main findings

You, your governors and senior leaders have reacted promptly and purposefully to the inspection findings. The improvement plan has clear objectives linked to the right priorities. All staff, governors and local authority officers have contributed helpfully to the development of the plan. You have appropriately balanced the advice you have received to set a clear pathway for improvement. A noticeboard in the staffroom is used effectively to highlight steps to success. This collaborative approach means that all staff are fully involved in improving the school and have the key priorities at the forefront of their work.

p.2

Main findings

You have appropriately revised the school’s approach to teaching reading. Guided reading activities are more regular and better matched to pupils’ interests and capabilities. During a learning walk, Year 5 and 6 pupils were able to competently use reading skills such as skimming to locate information about polar bears. Pupils say they enjoy reading. In the past, the range of reading materials available has been limited and not always appealing enough. Following responses to a pupil questionnaire and a review of reading materials, the school has updated its stock. It now includes books for Key Stage 1 pupils, class sets of books and computerised reading devices for older pupils. Pupils participate in the Reading Bus project and now read a wider range of literature more frequently. The emphasis on developing pupils’ love of reading is seen in the regular posting by the headteacher of ‘my book of the moment’ on the door to her office.

p.2

Main findings

There is a greater emphasis on improving the quality of teaching. Leaders are clear about their expectations but these are not fully understood by all staff. Leaders’ monitoring activities need to focus more specifically on the progress pupils make. Leaders make regular checks to ensure that changes to the way teachers plan for pupils are implemented effectively. Teachers’ planning includes activities that offer appropriate challenge for the most able pupils, particularly in mathematics. Pupils in many classes are making greater use of personalised learning targets to hone their skills. Senior leaders regularly scrutinise pupils’ books to check that feedback from teachers is helpful. Although there is some improvement, inconsistency prevails. Newly qualified teachers are well supported with regular opportunities to observe more experience colleagues.

p.2

Main findings

Governors have recently revised their roles and responsibilities, adjusting their committee structure to align more closely with the school’s improvement priorities. Governors provide very useful support to school leaders and are equally ambitious about improving the school. They make valuable comments, challenging senior leaders robustly and ensuring that improvement is clearly documented and validated. Areas requiring improvement are kept under scrutiny to make sure that leaders are held accountable for improving the school rapidly.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further monitoring inspections and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

Wokingham Borough Council provides very useful guidance. The school’s improvement officer makes regular visits to the school offering well judged support and challenge to make sure no time is lost in moving the school forward. School leaders are receptive. They are involved in the local authority’s ‘getting to good’ training to share good practice and learn from other colleagues. The council has brokered a National Leader of Education to help the school improve. A National Lead of Governance is chairing the school’s governing body very effectively. As a result, there is now a greater degree of challenge and scrutiny, which appropriately holds leaders to account for how well children are learning. The local authority has commissioned a full review of pupil premium funding which will take place in June 2015. As a helpful interim measure, a teaching and learning officer has looked closely at how well disadvantaged pupils in Year 6 are achieving compared to their

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Wokingham and as below.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion