Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 21 May 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jane Austin

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jane Austin

  • Postcode verified

    BD7 2AN

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+47Positivemore positive than 49% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveclearlyimprovedimprovingrobustsuccessfulconfidentconsistent
Criticismdisruptionpersistent absenceexclusions

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,137
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mr Neil Miley Principal Dixons Kings Academy Northside Road Lidget Green Bradford BD7 2AN

p.1

Academy, Bradford

Following my visit to your school with Fiona Manuel Her Majesty’s Inspector on 30 April 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the academy since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Academy, Bradford

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the academy was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in December 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Academy, Bradford

Senior leaders, governors and the sponsor are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, meetings were held with the Principal, other senior and middle leaders, and the Chief Executive Officer of Dixons Academies Trust. A phone conversation was held with the Chair of the Governing Body. Inpsectors observed line-up at the start of the day and daily reflection time. A learning walk, during which students’ workbooks were looked at, was conducted to a number of Key Stage 3 lessons. The academy’s improvement plan and self-evaluation were considered, as well as a range of supporting documentation. CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566 855 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email : gnewton@cfbt.com

p.1

Context

In January 2015, the academy became part of the Dixons Academies Trust and a new Principal took up post. A number of vacant teaching posts are covered by supply teachers.

p.2

Main findings

The academy’s improvement plan is clearly set out with sequential actions linked to demanding and, in the main, quantifiable targets. It is a high-level strategic plan encompassing the issues raised at the inspection. Milestone dates show when actions are expected to be piloted, implemented and reviewed. Progress is evaluated regularly, including by the governing body. The plan is not used at middle leadership level, where a system of action planning linked to frequent evaluations of departmental performance is clearly understood.

p.2

Main findings

A key driver in the improvement plan is the consistent implementation of whole- school systems, already tried and tested in other Dixons’ academies. The Principal has made a rapid start on this. There has been a sharp focus on establishing a purposeful climate in which the best learning can take place. Well-ordered routines ensure that students start the day on time and ready to learn – with the right uniform, equipment and conduct. Punctuality has improved considerably as a result.

p.2

Main findings

Routines in lessons have been introduced so that students know immediately both when and how teachers expect them to listen actively by tracking the speaker or work silently, independently, with a partner or in a group. Teachers have had training so that all use a common language to signal these expectations. New routines regarding equipment have helped to ensure that time in lessons is used fully. The same is true of ‘Do now’ tasks with which every lesson starts, helping students to practise literacy skills through a short activity linked to the subject. During the learning walk, use of these routines was observed, albeit with varying levels of success. Although not thoroughly embedded, low-level disruption to learning has decreased, as has the number of detentions and exclusions.

p.2

Main findings

Coaching of all teachers has been introduced as a key strategy for improving the quality of teaching. Short observations are made weekly, accompanied by feedback which is then followed up. Staff spoken to welcomed the regular opportunities to reflect on their practice through open, professional dialogue. A whole-school approach to marking and feedback has been introduced. Teachers note what went well and where improvements can be made, sometimes giving students the opportunity to respond. However, this is evidently not embedded fully since students spoken to seemed uncertain about the purpose of responses.

p.2

Main findings

At present there is a mismatch between the academy’s view of the quality of teaching and the measures of students’ progress. Drawing on expertise in the academies group, further work is underway to secure the accuracy of assessments. This is both to ensure that measures of progress are correct and that teachers have a clear understanding of the levels at which students are working. Help has also been provided to ensure that students with special educational needs are correctly identified. As a consequence, some additional support is now in place for a number of Year 10 students and further work is planned to improve the quality of provision for all those with additional needs.

p.2

Main findings

Plans for significant improvements to the curriculum from September are well underway. Creative subjects are being introduced and staff have been recruited to deliver these. The introduction of a whole-school approach to promoting students’ literacy skills, including their oracy, is in hand. The school day is being revised and students will be offered extra-curricular opportunities for new activities and sports to enrich their learning and personal development.

p.3

Main findings

The academy is adopting the electronic analysis systems used by the Dixons group of schools. This is improving the quality of management information available to leaders. For example, it has highlighted the above-average level of persistent absence. Leaders are working hard to identify the reasons for this. The Dixons group has recently employed an education social worker who will work with Kings for two days per week to raise attendance.

p.3

Main findings

The governing body has transferred unaltered to the academy in its new form, providing stability through governors’ in-depth knowledge and understanding of the situation. Governors bring very considerable experience and expertise to their roles and meeting minutes show that they provide a robust level of challenge regarding decisions. Two governors are also part of the Dixons Group’s governing council so are well placed to shine a spotlight on the academy’s needs.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further monitoring inspections and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

Dixons Academies Trust is providing considerable support to the academy. This includes help to implement successful systems used across the Dixons schools, including those for analysing students’ achievement. The Chief Executive Officer is confident that the range of expertise required can be found within the Dixons family of academies, as is the case with leadership of provision for students with special educational needs. The sponsor has acted promptly to strengthen leadership at the senior level, recruiting a senior Vice-Principal from September. Meanwhile, a highly experience consultant senior leader has been engaged to add capacity in the interim.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, Dixons Academies Trust and the Director of Children’s Services for Bradford.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion