Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Barley Hill Primary School
Summary
Jeanie Jovanova (lead), Ben Jordan, Lynne Thorogood
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
29 Apr 2015
- Inspectors verified
Ben Jordan, Jeanie Jovanova, Lynne Thorogood
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
OX9 3DH
- Name on report verified
Barley Hill Primary School
- URN verified
123034
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2007.
- OverallGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.8
- This means children make good progress and develop strong skills so that they are well prepared for Year 1. p.6
- They are also keen to reward exceptional performance and have developed a range of ways of doing so. p.5
- Pupils are exceptionally polite and go out of their way to help each other and visitors to the school. p.5
- There is a strong focus on British values, democracy and the rule of law, illustrated and referred to in high quality displays throughout the school. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. p.8
- Pupils’ outcomes are not yet outstanding from all their respective starting points. p.4
- These developments are very recent, and the early years provision has not yet secured outstanding outcomes for all children. p.7
- Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. p.8
- However, if necessary, governors will withhold a pay increase where targets are not met. p.5
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Communication & language7
“make particularly good progress in their language skills.” p.6Parents & families7
“Parents overwhelmingly agree that their children make good progress.” p.6
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 10
- Words of findings
- 2,910
- about usual (typical 2966)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Barley Hill Primary School Ludsden Grove, Thame, OX9 3DH
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Requires improvement 3 This inspection: Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Early years provision Good 2
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Leaders, including governors, have worked effectively to improve the quality of teaching since the previous inspection. They have achieved their aim of increasing pupils’ achievement, which is now good. Standards have risen in reading, writing and mathematics so that they are now significantly above average by the end of Year 6. Teachers plan lessons which challenge and engage pupils’ interest, especially the most able who apply themselves exceptionally well. Teachers are overwhelmingly positive about the training and support they receive to help them develop their skills. Pupils behave well. They are courteous and respectful, play together harmoniously and have positive attitudes to learning. Attendance has improved since the previous inspection. This supports the views of parents who unanimously state that their children are happy at school. Pupils feel safe at school and say that the school teaches them how to stay safe in a range of
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
situations. The school promotes pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development exceptionally well. The broad range of high quality sporting activities enhances pupils’ physical well-being. Early years provision is good. Children are well prepared to start Year 1 because activities ensure they develop skills across a range of areas of learning.
p.1
It is not yet an outstanding school because
Not all pupils who finish their work quickly move on to another activity without delay. This slows their learning. Tasks are sometimes too difficult for some pupils whose starting points are lower. This limits their ability to make rapid and sustained progress.
p.1
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed 24 lessons or parts of lessons, twelve of which were observed jointly with senior leaders. Lessons seen included the teaching of phonics (letter patterns and the sounds they make), mathematics, writing, science and physical education. The inspection team listened to pupils read. They also looked closely at pupils’ work in lessons, as well as work they have completed over time in their books. Inspectors held meetings with pupils, staff, a representative from the local authority and members of the governing body, including the Chair of Governors and the chairs of several sub-committees. The inspection team scrutinised a range of documents including those relating to safeguarding and child protection, and logs of behaviour incidents and name-calling. They also looked at the school’s own self- evaluation and development planning, checks made on the quality of teaching, and information about
p.2
Information about this inspection
pupils’ academic performance. Inspectors took into account the views of the 116 parents who completed the online Parent View survey, as well as the views of parents they spoke to during the course of the inspection. They also considered the responses to the 27 questionnaires returned by members of staff.
p.2
Inspection team
Jeanie Jovanova, Lead inspector Additional Inspector
p.2
Information about this school
This is a larger than average-sized primary school. The proportion of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs is lower than average. A disproportionate amount of these pupils are eligible for pupil premium funding. The school receives the pupil premium (additional funding for pupils known to be eligible for free school meals or children who are looked after) for just under one in ten pupils. This figure is much lower than the national average. The proportion of pupils from minority ethnic backgrounds is much lower than average at just over 10%. About half of these pupils speak English as an additional language, a much smaller percentage than that found nationally. Very few are at the early stages of learning English. The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress in reading, writing and mathematics by the end of Year 6.
p.3
Information about this school
The early years provision comprises three Reception classes which all children attend full time.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve teaching so that it is outstanding by ensuring that: pupils from all starting points make rapid and sustained progress pupils who finish their work are enabled to quickly move on to another activity without delay teachers provide tasks that are not too difficult for pupils from lower starting points to access.
p.3
The leadership and management are good
Leaders, including governors, are ambitious for pupils to do well. This is reflected in the challenging progress rates they expect each class to make across the course of a year. Leadership is effective, as proven by the range of improvements instituted since the previous inspection in teaching, achievement and leadership itself. The system for managing teachers’ performance is rigorous. Leaders make a range of checks across the year including observing lessons and scrutinising pupils’ work in books. They identify strengths and areas of improvement so that they can give teachers clear pointers on how well they are doing and how to improve further. Middle leaders contribute well to school improvement. They analyse information about the progress of pupils in their year groups. Where needed, they support colleagues to ensure that this remains on track to meet the ambitious targets set. The pupil premium funding is used effectively to ensure disadvantaged pupils make similar, or better,
p.4
The leadership and management are good
progress than their peers. Figures from 2014 show that, across Key Stage 2, disadvantaged pupils’ progress rates had risen sharply on the previous year. They were well above those of other pupils, both in school, and nationally. Taking into account the fact that numbers are low and there is often a higher proportion of pupils with special educational needs in this group, the achievement of disadvantaged pupils currently in school remains good. Leaders foster good relationships. This is clearly evident in the positive interactions around the school and the respectful attitudes pupils have. Pupils understand what discrimination means and assert that it has no place in their school. Teachers plan topics that challenge stereotypes. For example, some of the youngest pupils were learning about Uganda (the school has strong links with a school there) and were shown pictures of gleaming skyscrapers and luxury hotels.
p.4
The leadership and management are good
Leaders’ rigorous analysis of the progress of different groups to ensure they all succeed equally well is testament to the school’s unswerving commitment to equal opportunities. Safeguarding is effective. Policies and procedures are in place to ensure that the school meets statutory requirements. Governors check that this is the case. Pupils and parents have full confidence in the system, as reflected in the unanimous return against this question in the online Parent View survey. The curriculum is a strength of the school. Strong links across subjects mean pupils can revisit ideas throughout the day in different lessons. Topics start with an enticing ‘hook’ to engage pupils from the outset. Factual examples, experiments, visitors and trips bring things to life. This helps pupils embed concepts securely. The school promotes pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development exceptionally well. It is clear
p.4
The leadership and management are good
about its values and encourages pupils to reflect on them continually. Assemblies and religious education lessons play a crucial part in developing pupils’ ability to reflect deeply on spiritual issues. This links to their social development as they learn to navigate a range of social situations with increasing tact and empathy. Topics often allow pupils to explore moral dimensions, such as those in the First and Second World Wars. Pupils think about the implications for both sides of being involved in conflict. They think about the consequences of negative actions, for example in their understanding of bullying. A strong focus on the arts and the chance to learn a musical instrument enhance cultural development. There is a strong focus on British values, democracy and the rule of law, illustrated and referred to in high quality displays throughout the school. Visits to Oxford University promote British excellence and
p.4
The leadership and management are good
encourage pupils to have high aspirations. The careful attention to ensuring that pupils embrace diversity and look beyond stereotypes prepares them exceptionally well for life in modern Britain. Leaders use the primary school physical education and sport funding effectively. After listening to pupils’ views, leaders introduced a broader range of sporting opportunities. Taster sessions for newly introduced activities were used to good effect to encourage pupils who had hitherto not participated. Teachers have received training, following a survey to gauge how confident they felt in teaching elements of the physical education (PE) curriculum. This has resulted in higher quality physical education lessons and better participation rates which have had a positive impact on pupils’ physical well-being. The local authority has supported the school well to make improvements since the previous inspection.
p.4
The leadership and management are good
Having seen how the school has managed this, local authority officers are secure that the school is now good. Support has therefore decreased, as the school now has the capacity to lead its own improvements from within. Leadership is not outstanding because there are still areas that need to be further improved. Pupils’ outcomes are not yet outstanding from all their respective starting points. The governance of the school: Governance is effective. Governors challenge leaders well to continually improve pupils’ outcomes. They use a range of information about academic performance to gauge how well their school compares to national figures. This gives them valuable leverage with which to question leaders. The governors know that the school’s systems for managing teachers’ performance are robust. Governors understand that receiving a pay rise is linked to meeting performance targets. They know that leaders support any
p.4
The leadership and management are good
teachers in danger of underperforming. However, if necessary, governors will withhold a pay increase where targets are not met. They are also keen to reward exceptional performance and have developed a range of ways of doing so. They know that these systems are effective and contribute successfully to raising the quality of teaching.
p.5
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils is good. Pupils are exceptionally polite and go out of their way to help each other and visitors to the school. They were always on hand to show inspectors their way around, opening doors and enquiring if there was anything they could do to assist. Pupils and staff state that this is what behaviour is always like and most parents support this view. Attitudes to learning are positive in lessons and in books. This can be seen by how regularly pupils respond to comments teachers make when marking. Pupils know what they need to do to improve their work and take this into consideration during lessons. Pupils follow instructions well. They waste no time in transitioning from one lesson to the next and in preparing the resources they need for learning. Behaviour is not outstanding because, occasionally, when pupils finish work quickly, they do not move on quickly to another activity. This is partly because teachers and leaders have not established secure
p.5
Behaviour
routines to enable pupils to be clear what they should do next. However, sometimes, pupils know that there are options in terms of activities to move on to but do not choose to do so in a timely manner.
p.5
Safety
The school’s work to keep pupils safe and secure is good. Policies are regularly updated and staff receive frequent, comprehensive training on how to keep pupils safe. Pupils say they feel safe, and the overwhelming majority of parents agree. Pupils learn how to stay safe outside the school environment too. For example, they learn about how to use the internet safely. They have even been taught how to perform resuscitation. Pupils have a good understanding of bullying and are adamant that it does not happen in school. They know that it is persistent and can involve physical harm or the threat of it as well as name-calling. They also understand that you can use mobile devices and the internet to bully people. They are less confident in identifying more subtle forms of bullying, such as ostracising someone or the significance of spreading rumours.
p.5
The quality of teaching is good
Since the previous inspection, leaders have ensured that pupils of all ages know exactly what they have done well and what they need to do to improve their work. Teachers regularly highlight strong features of pupils’ work so that, when asked, pupils are very clear what they are good at. Teachers also make helpful suggestions when marking pupils’ work. Pupils respond positively to these suggestions and this clearly improves their work. For example, after being prompted to find some alternatives for ‘nice’, pupils were able to use much more descriptive adjectives such as ‘awesome’ and ‘elegant’. Teachers make ambitious demands of pupils’ reasoning skills in mathematics lessons. Consequently, once pupils have been taught a new concept, they are able to apply it in a range of different contexts. Teachers impart strong subject knowledge in a clear and accessible way to help pupils learn well in lessons.
p.5
The quality of teaching is good
Pupils develop strong phonics skills because teaching is precise and well matched to their needs. This underpins their confidence in reading increasingly complex texts as they move through the school. Pupils can clearly articulate what skills they use when reading, and know how to choose books that present them with a challenge. They particularly appreciate how reading the right book augments their vocabulary. Teachers use highly technical vocabulary in lessons and expect pupils to refer to it correctly in their own work. This is often illustrated by something visual or concrete so that pupils fully understand what words mean. For example, in a science lesson on the digestive system, pupils crushed up food and pushed it down a tube into a plastic container of ‘digestive juices’. This enabled them to understand the work of the oesophagus and how food is broken down in the stomach. They were then able to write about this in a
p.5
The quality of teaching is good
detailed way by using the correct scientific terms. Teachers’ use of the ‘hook’ often successfully develops pupils’ lyrical and adventurous vocabulary in writing. This was seen in a writing lesson observed during the inspection where pupils had each been given a feather to describe. These had been carefully selected for their intricate patterns. The teacher supported pupils well to develop inventive and poetic descriptions, often using advanced language features such as similes. Pupils were highly engaged in their work because the feathers intrigued them. Teachers have high expectations of what pupils can achieve and plan challenging work that requires pupils to think and reason. This really benefits the most able who rise to the challenge by producing work of a very high calibre. However, tasks are sometimes too difficult for pupils from lower starting points to cope with. Occasionally, some of them are not able to access the work they are given and this slows their learning.
p.6
is good
Pupils achieve well and reach standards in reading, writing and mathematics that are significantly above average by the end of Year 6. The rate of progress pupils make across Key Stage 2 has increased notably since the previous inspection. Parents overwhelmingly agree that their children make good progress. The most able make good progress because teachers plan tasks that really stretch them. For example, in mathematics lessons, they are often expected to solve complex problems and work together well to do so, discussing their ideas and refining their thoughts as they go. This is confirmed as the norm by the high quality of work they have completed in their books over the course of this year. The proportion of pupils reaching the very highest levels is rising year on year. Disadvantaged pupils did extremely well in tests at the end of Year 6 in 2014, progressing well from their differing starting points. In mathematics, they were approximately half a term ahead of their classmates
p.6
is good
and nearly a term ahead of other pupils nationally. In reading, they were half a term ahead of others in school and less than half a term below others nationally. There was a slightly wider gap in writing, where they were a term behind other pupils in school and just under half a term behind others nationally. Disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs make good progress from their starting points because teaching assistants support them effectively in class. Leaders also meet teachers regularly to check pupils’ achievement so that they can provide any additional teaching needed to fill gaps in pupils’ knowledge and skills. Numbers of pupils from different ethnic groups in each class are often small. However, because leaders and teachers meet regularly to discuss the progress of individual pupils, they ensure that pupils from all groups achieve equally well. Pupils who speak English as an additional language, including those at an early stage of learning English,
p.6
is good
make particularly good progress in their language skills. This is because of the many opportunities they are given to develop interesting and appropriate vocabulary in a range of subjects.
p.6
is good
Children get off to a good start in Reception because leaders quickly establish what they can do and plan activities that move their learning on. This means children make good progress and develop strong skills so that they are well prepared for Year 1. The school provides opportunities for children and their parents to get to know staff and the setting as part of their admission procedures. The process starts from before they even join the school and parents appreciate how well it helps their children settle. Teaching is good because teachers ensure that activities in both the indoor and outdoor learning environments meet children’s needs. Teachers and teaching assistants then interact effectively with children to ensure they make the most of the opportunities on offer. Staff make careful observations of what children can do which helps them plan next steps. These processes help to build children’s skills and
p.6
is good
abilities well. Leaders ensure that all safeguarding protocols are robust and that all staff understand what to do to keep children safe. Part of the success of the work the school does to ensure children are kept safe is to teach them how to take calculated risks. A good example of this was a physical education lesson where children were using apparatus. Staff were vigilant in supporting children to use new pieces of apparatus and provided ongoing commentary to ensure they did so safely. Consequently, children’s enjoyment was palpable and they made great strides in the development of their gymnastic skills. Children behave well. They show good manners, and are beginning to learn to resolve differences amicably without adult support. They show high levels of interest in their learning and can sustain concentration for increasing periods. Leadership of early years is good. Leaders have used the support from the local authority well to develop
p.6
is good
the skills needed to check the quality of teaching accurately. This is beginning to ensure that standards are equally high across all classes. These developments are very recent, and the early years provision has not yet secured outstanding outcomes for all children.
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is failing
p.8
Grade Judgement Description
to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.8
School details
Unique reference number 123034 Local authority Oxfordshire Inspection number 462387
p.9
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.9
School details
Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 495 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Phil Evans Headteacher Anne Stopforth Date of previous school inspection 2–3 May 2013 Telephone number 01844213100 Fax number 01844260402 Email address office.2463@barley-hill.oxon.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.9
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.10
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.10
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.10
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.10
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.10
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion