Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Brian Cartwright
- Postcode verified
B32 3QD
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 747
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Ms A Pickin Headteacher St Peter's Catholic Primary School Adams Hill Bartley Green Birmingham B32 3QD
p.1
Primary School
Following my visit to your school on 5 May 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Primary School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in January 2015. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Primary School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Evidence
During the inspection, meetings were held with the head teacher, other senior leaders, the chair of the Governing Body, and a representative of the local authority to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. The school action plan was evaluated. The inspector visited a number of classes jointly with a senior leader to sample teaching. The inspector scrutinized examples of pupils’ mathematics work and minutes of the Governing Body. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9156 Direct email : emma.norwood@serco.com
p.1
Main findings
The changes to staff structure that commenced in the autumn term allow middle leaders to take greater responsibility for pupil progress. The current arrangement with an acting deputy, and acting assistant head teacher, is likely to continue in the medium term. School leaders know precisely what still needs to improve in mathematics and reading comprehension. More work is necessary to consolidate a root-and-branch change to the way mathematics is taught.
p.2
Main findings
This new approach to mathematics runs throughout the school. It aims to ensure that pupils fully understand the principles of mathematics, and so can apply them confidently in new problem solving contexts. Teachers are all trying to implement the approach. They have lesson activities and resources that accommodate the full range of learning needs of a class. As yet, these differentiated tasks are not deployed fluently enough to maximise individual pupil progress in lessons. This is most evident in whole-class teaching.
p.2
Main findings
Teachers are marking work accurately, with signs that developmental comments for pupils are resulting in a useful response from the majority of pupils. Sometimes, the pupils responses are not subsequently checked. Teachers are trying to develop pupils’ self-assessment skills, using techniques such as peer assessment. This may have long-term benefits, but there are examples of pupils incorrectly ‘marking’ work that has subsequently gone unnoticed.
p.2
Main findings
The external review of governance has not yet been carried out. The schools’ action plan does address the key areas for development but does not include pupil outcome ‘targets’ within the plan; that data is available separately. It is not therefore easy to evaluate the impact of the actions that are taking place on pupil outcomes. The records of governors meetings, and the summary reports by school leaders to the governing body, are not evaluative enough to form an impression of how well, or otherwise, the school is tackling the key issues. There are, however, comprehensive pupil attainment and progress information available to all leaders and governors that tracks performance over time for each class and group of learners. This would further benefit by being compared with national figures.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further monitoring inspections and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection. HMI were unable to meet with the full governing body. HMI may return in the autumn term to attend a governing body meeting and review progress in mathematics.
p.2
External support
The local authority has brokered a link with a teaching school. The head teacher of that school is supporting leadership at St Peters. In combination with an existing local cluster of schools, useful teacher training activities are taking place. These include opportunities of staff to see outstanding practice, and work in partnership with good practitioners to develop their teaching skills. The local authority is providing governor training.
p.2
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Birmingham and as below.
p.3
Her Majesty’s Inspector
The letter should be copied to the following:
p.3
Her Majesty’s Inspector
Chair of the Governing Body Local authority Diocese Director of Children’s Services for Birmingham
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion