Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 20 May 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Clare Cossor

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Clare Cossor

  • Postcode verified

    NG3 5HS

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+17Mostly positivemore positive than 33% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveeffectivelystrongambitiousimprovingclearrigorousaccurate
Criticismpoorinsufficienttoo lowinconsistencyunclearnot consistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
850
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Ms Eve Moran Walter Halls Primary and Early Years School Querneby Road Mapperley Nottingham NG3 5HS

p.1

and Early Years School

Following my visit to your school on 1 May 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

and Early Years School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in January 2015. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

and Early Years School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, meetings were held with you, other senior leaders, two members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. I also met with teachers with responsibility for different key stages and different subjects. I evaluated your plans for improvement and looked at records of staff observations and achievement data. I visited classes and observed lessons with you. I met with a group of pupils from Year 5 and Year 6 and looked at work in pupils’ books. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9154 Direct email : aidan.dunne@serco.com

p.1

Context

Since the last inspection the acting deputy headteacher and assistant headteacher have become permanent. There is a new leadership post specifically to improve the teaching of reading.

p.2

Main findings

You provide strong leadership to the school and have shared your vision for improvement effectively with governors, staff, parents and pupils. You are determined to provide the very best standard of education for your pupils and to tackle the previous legacy of underperformance. The majority of staff are demanding more of their pupils and, as a result, outcomes for pupils are beginning to improve.

p.2

Main findings

The development plan is clear and detailed and sets out the ambitious targets needed to bring about improvement. However, there are insufficient measures included to compare pupils’ achievement with that of other pupils nationally.

p.2

Main findings

All leaders are now involved in a rigorous system of monitoring the quality of teaching. They have worked alongside you and external consultants to develop their confidence and skill in this area of their work. New job descriptions for the phase leaders for the Early Years, Key Stage 1 and Key Stage 2 have ensured greater clarity about what is expected of them. Leaders have a more accurate view of high- quality teaching across the school because they have worked together to share their expertise of teaching different age groups. The senior leadership team is now able to support you effectively and, therefore, the pace of improvement is beginning to quicken.

p.2

Main findings

Teaching is weakest in some Key stage 1 classes. Leaders are working hard to turn this round as a matter of urgency.

p.2

Main findings

Most teachers are presenting work to pupils in increasingly exciting and meaningful ways. However, the high standard of classroom organisation and tidiness is not consistent in all classrooms.

p.2

Main findings

Teachers now understand their responsibilities in tracking the progress of everyone in their class. Pupil progress meetings take place each half term and leaders are helping teachers to set challenging targets for all pupils. Year 5 and Year 6 pupils are very clear that they are now expected to work harder in school. Pupils say that behaviour at playtimes is now ‘much better’ because adults take part in games and sports activities with them. As a result, behaviour is improving, both and out of lessons.

p.2

Main findings

Standards in attainment are rising but are still too low, particularly in writing, in both Key Stage 1 and Key Stage 2. Mathematics is improving in Key Stage 1 but is still poor in comparison with national expectations. Standards in reading are rising significantly across the school. The introduction of new reading support programmes is already helping to raise standards.

p.2

Main findings

A new marking policy has been in place since February. There is still some inconsistency in how well this is implemented. Pupils understand what the new marking code means. However, some of them are unclear about what they are expected to do after a teacher has given a correction or written a comment.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further monitoring inspections and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The local authority is giving effective support to the school. It has provided guidance on improving leadership and teaching. Leaders with responsibility for English and mathematics have benefited from training on the analysis of data.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Nottingham.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

The letter should be copied to the following:

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

 Appropriate authority - Chair of the Governing Body/Interim Executive Board  Local authority – including where the school is an academy

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion