Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 20 May 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Matthew Barnes

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Matthew Barnes

  • Postcode verified

    SO40 8EB

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+48Positivemore positive than 49% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectiveimprovingrobustambitiousskilledpositivelysuccessfully
Criticismat riskweaknessgapsyet to

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
869
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mr G Moore Headteacher Abbotswood Junior School Ringwood Road Southampton SO40 8EB

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on Tuesday 28 April 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in January 2015. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. At its previous section 5 inspection the school was also judged to require improvement.

p.1

School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, I met with you, both deputy headteachers, some subject leaders, two governors, including the Chair of the Governing Body, and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. We completed short visits to classrooms together, during which I spoke to some pupils about their work and looked through some of their books. I evaluated the school improvement plan, reviewed documentation about the work of the governing body and scrutinised evaluations of teaching and learning.

p.1

Context

Since the last inspection two part-time and one full-time teacher have left the school. Three teachers have joined the school to fill these positions. Tribal Kings Orchard, One Queen Street, Bristol BS2 0HQ T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5323 Direct email :suzy.smith@tribalgroup.com

p.1

Main findings

You provide ambitious, strategic and skilled leadership at the school. Your focus on improving teaching and learning is unwavering. Staff at the school now share your vision for effective teaching and learning. As a result, the work you are doing to improve the school is now rapid and sustained.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders at the school have responded positively to the outcomes of the previous inspection. You have decided to restructure the leadership of the school to build capacity in key roles. Leaders at all levels are already clearer about their responsibilities to improve pupils’ achievement. You have deployed your full-time teaching coach effectively to support improvements to teaching. Teachers now get useful and instant feedback about their practice. As a result, there is already much greater consistency in the quality of teaching and learning across the school.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders’ understanding of pupils’ achievement is sharper. Subject leaders are now using data about pupils’ progress to evaluate where pupils’ achievement needs to improve. The new method for presenting assessment data has enabled teachers to effectively analyse the learning of different groups of pupils. This means that all staff, including leaders, have a much better overview of how pupils learn over time. This means staff are now identifying pupils at risk of underachieving much sooner and amending provision to tackle this effectively.

p.2

Main findings

Governors are already holding senior leaders more fully to account. This is because they have been quick to develop new roles on the governing body to target their work in areas of relative weakness. For example, there is now a governor who has a specific overview of how the pupil premium grant is used. The robust challenge to leaders she has already provided has successfully raised leaders’ expectations of what needs to be improved in this area of work.

p.2

Main findings

Teaching is improving rapidly. Your pursuit of excellence in the delivery of your teaching and learning policy has already raised teachers’ expectations of what pupils can achieve. As a result, lessons are more challenging for pupils. This is because teachers are using assessment information in lessons more effectively so that they target their teaching on what pupils need to learn next. As a result, all groups of pupils are beginning to make better progress.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders have rightly identified the need to do more to narrow the gaps between the achievement of disadvantaged pupils at the school and their peers. Leaders now track the progress of disadvantaged pupils effectively and review this against how they use the pupil premium grant. As a result, leaders have accurately identified where changes are needed. Improvements made to provision in this area, however, are yet to have an impact on disadvantaged pupils’ progress. Ofsted may carry out further monitoring inspections and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

Leaders have made very good use of external support. For example, they have responded proactively to the robust challenge provided by the local authority adviser who works with the school. The adviser has also given useful advice to leaders about improving leadership and approaches to improving how pupils’ achievement is tracked. Leaders have made good use of the findings of the pupil premium review. The review gave useful next steps, so that leaders were able to act rapidly to improve this area of their work. Leaders have already put in place the majority of points for development that were set.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Hampshire.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion