Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 19 May 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Julie Yarwood

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Julie Yarwood

  • Postcode verified

    WA9 2JE

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+77Very positivemore positive than 78% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositiveclearconfidentoutstandingimprovedstrongextremelyeffective
Criticismconcernbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,412
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
24 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mrs Michelle Ravey Headteacher Holy Spirit Catholic Primary School Brunswick Street Parr St Helens Merseyside WA9 2JE

p.1

Primary School, St. Helens

Following my visit to your school on 28 April 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Primary School, St. Helens

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in December 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary School, St. Helens

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Primary School, St. Helens

 ensure that information on the school’s website is fully up to date and contains detailed information for parents about what children learn in each year group.  ensure that more able learners are accurately identified and their progress is tracked as a discrete group.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, I held meetings with you and your assistant headteacher, five members of the Governing Body, a representative of the local authority and one from the Archdiocese, a group of subject leaders and a group of eight Year 5 pupils. The focus of the meetings was to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566937 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email :jsimmons@cfbt.com In addition, you accompanied me on a tour of the school and we made brief visits to each class. The school improvement plan was evaluated and I looked at a range of documentation including records of meetings of the Governing Body, records of staff professional training and monitoring of teaching and learning, senior leaders’ analysis of pupils’ current progress and external reviews by the local authority. I

p.1

Evidence

looked at a sample of work from pupils in Years 2, 5 and 6.

p.2

Context

Since the inspection, the new early years leader has taken up post and teaches in the reception class. The current assistant headteacher has been appointed to take up the post of deputy headteacher from September 2015. The seconded deputy headteacher left the school in January. The school business manager and the reception class teacher are currently not in school. The Chair of the Governing Body has very recently taken the decision to relinquish her post and this post is vacant.

p.2

Main findings

Since the inspection, it is clear that you and your senior leaders have continued to move developments forward swiftly, with determination and with unswerving positivity. There is a strong sense of shared leadership and collective responsibility for improvement. The school improvement plan was amended in the light of the areas for improvement in the inspection report and includes concrete actions linked to these areas.

p.2

Main findings

Significant amounts of staff training have taken place and more is planned to tackle key aspects of teaching practice such as coaching focussing on tailoring work to meet the needs of all pupils. The local authority mathematics consultant has led two training sessions to explore the key skills in teaching problem-solving so that teachers are more confident and competent in using this approach to support learning. Links to the St Helens Teaching Alliance and a visit to an outstanding school are helping teachers to strengthen their subject knowledge and to share good practice. In addition, an in-school coaching programme focussing on mathematics is allowing staff to work together to share and develop their classroom practice. You consider training to be impacting positively in the classroom; you shared with me an example of seeing the aspects of ‘conjecture’ and ‘estimation’ being used in mathematics lessons when you conducted a learning walk following training. Middle

p.2

Main findings

and senior leaders comment that there is now greater openness and confidence among staff. Working together is more common place and they share ideas about strategies that work best in the classroom.

p.2

Main findings

Middle leaders are becoming more confident in their roles. They check teaching and learning in their subject areas through work sampling and provide helpful feedback to teachers. The work sample conducted shows improvements in some areas in feedback given to pupils to help them to improve their work. This is however still at a developmental stage and there is more to be done to ensure that feedback is consistent in all classes and in all subjects so that pupils know exactly how to improve.

p.2

Main findings

Processes to evaluate the quality of learning and teaching have been strengthened and now include learning walks, work sampling, analysis of pupils’ progress and formal assessment data. These actions are being used to target improvement and to drive improvements in teaching and learning in the classroom.

p.3

Main findings

Current achievement data and predictions for the Key Stage 2 pupils are positive and show improvement. Data highlight however that there is a continuing concern with Key Stage 1 progress. You and your senior leaders are acutely aware of this issue and are appropriately directing resources to support learning in this Key Stage. You acknowledge also that there is more work to be done around the identification and tracking of more able learners and the data analysis does not currently track this group of pupils as a discrete group.

p.3

Main findings

The new lead for the early years has brought about some significant changes in a short period of time. From the point of her arrival in school, she has re-evaluated the assessments of children so that they reflect accurately what children know and can do when they start at the school. She has made changes to the learning areas to create a more stimulating learning environment and has changed the daily timetable to ensure that time is appropriately used to help children to learn. These developments are accompanied by a new system for capturing children’s progress and review meetings to ensure that teaching focuses on tackling the learning needs of all groups of children.

p.3

Main findings

Pupils are extremely positive about their school and are proud of their work. A group of Year 5 pupils expressed the view that they now feel challenged in their work and that they feel that their school has improved ‘loads’. The school is now a vibrant celebration of learning with stimulating displays evident which demonstrate a range of approaches taken to learning. Pupils commented that they appreciate the opportunities to learn in different ways and that they are now finding learning fun. They also value the occasions when their family members are invited into school to share in the ‘wow’ events and comment that this helps them to ‘share the experience’ of learning.

p.3

Main findings

Members of the governing body say that the findings of the inspection have made them ‘hungry for progress’. They are supportive of school leaders and demonstrate a clear understanding of the improvements made and where there is still further work to do. Governors feel that as a result of the improved information that they receive, they have a better understanding of the work of the school and are in a stronger position to offer support and challenge. Governors are very conscious of the need to swiftly appoint a replacement for the Chair of Governors and are being well supported in this. Ofsted may carry out further monitoring inspections and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

It is clear that you value the support provided by the local authority and the Archdiocese who have a clear understanding of the needs of the school. The local authority has been instrumental in providing consultant support as well as organising links with another school and conducting in-school reviews to bring about improvement. The support is having a positive effect on the school’s progress. Both the local authority and the Archdiocese are providing essential assistance in terms of staff appointments and in finding a replacement for the Chair of Governors.

p.4

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for St Helens and as below.

p.4

Her Majesty’s Inspector

The letter should be copied to the following:

p.4

Her Majesty’s Inspector

 Appropriate authority - Chair of the Governing Body/Interim Executive Board  Local authority – including where the school is an academy  Diocese – for voluntary aided and voluntary controlled schools

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion