Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 19 May 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Deirdre Duignan

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Deirdre Duignan

  • Postcode verified

    NG9 3DU

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+34Mostly positivemore positive than 41% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositivelyeffectiverigorouspositiveclear
Criticismat riskbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Full report text

Paul Heery Alderman White School and Language College Chilwell Lane Bramcote Nottingham NG9 3DU

p.1

School and Language College

Following my visit to your school on 30 April 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School and Language College

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the academy was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School and Language College

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, meetings were held with the executive headteacher, senior and subject leaders and the Chair of Directors to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. The academy’s post-Ofsted action plan and improvement plans were evaluated. I looked at a range of other documentation, including: the academy’s self-evaluation, the review of pupil premium spending and minutes of the directors’ meetings. Accompanied by senior leaders I made short visits to lessons and looked at the quality of students’ work, and I spoke to a group of Year 12 students. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9161 Direct email : ann.morris@serco.com

p.1

Context

A permanent teacher of mathematics has been appointed within the academy, and another has been appointed to work across the federation with which the academy is associated. A teacher for English and media studies has also been appointed.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders have high ambition for the academy, and have reacted positively and with determination to the inspection findings. Following the inspection, they devised a plan with clear, realistic actions linked to the key priorities for improvement, and quickly made several key changes which have had notable impact. For example, they revised how targets were set for students to ensure that these were sufficiently challenging. Students have responded positively to these higher expectations, and are working hard to achieve their new target grades. Roles within school have been re-organised to ensure a greater focus on improvement. Weekly meetings review progress against actions taken, and identify further actions that need to be implemented. Leaders have taken care to include parents, staff and students in the planned changes. Students appreciate these opportunities to air their views, telling the inspector: ‘[leaders] don’t just listen to us, they ensure that things get done’.

p.2

Main findings

Actions to improve teaching are having impact. There are now more opportunities for teachers to learn from each other’s practice, and the coaching system is used to good effect to ensure that teachers can put these ideas into practice. Links with partner schools in the teaching school alliance are being well used to support the development of teachers and subject leaders, who are playing a significant role in securing the further improvement of the school.

p.2

Main findings

The process of quality assurance has undergone significant change. As a result of more rigorous monitoring and evaluation, leaders at all levels have better knowledge of the quality of teaching and achievement across the academy. Students at risk of underachievement are quickly identified and supported. For example, a small group of students was observed working with a mathematics tutor on topics they had found difficult in a recent assessment. They told the inspector that this intervention is making a significant difference to their understanding, and increasing the progress they are making.

p.2

Main findings

Teachers are beginning to use information about students to plan better lessons. This was evident in a mathematics lesson, for example, where the teacher had planned different outcomes for students according to the target grades they had been set. There is further work to do to ensure that all teachers set work that is sufficiently challenging for all students.

p.2

Main findings

The appointment of an inclusion leader in Key Stage 5 has led to improvements in the attendance and punctuality of sixth form students. This, alongside measures taken to improve the way leaders monitor students’ progress, is having a positive impact on raising achievement in the sixth form. The academy’s directors re-structured their sub-committees following the inspection, and this new structure enables directors to have a closer oversight of the academy’s progress. Directors use their knowledge and expertise to hold academy leaders stringently to account, and to suggest ways for the academy to improve further.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further monitoring inspections and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

Following the inspection leaders arranged for external consultants to undertake a review of pupil premium spending, and took action in line with its recommendations. A leader has been appointed to monitor the progress of this group more carefully, and takes action to ensure they receive the support they need to achieve well and take a full part in school life. Consequently, these students are now doing better. Information provided by the academy shows that they are now making the same rate of progress as their peers in English, and are quickly catching up in mathematics.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Nottinghamshire local authority and as below.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

The letter should be copied to the following:

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

 Chair of the Governing Body  Nottinghamshire Local authority  The Education Funding Agency hns.efa@education.gsi.gov.uk  CausingConcern.SCHOOLS@education.gsi.gov.uk

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion