Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Sandra Hayes
- Postcode verified
ST2 0DQ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 695
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Jonathan Baddeley Maple Court Academy Beverley Drive Stoke-on-Trent Staffordshire ST2 0DQ
p.1
Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of Maple Court Academy
Following my visit to your academy on 28 April 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the outcome and inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the academy’s most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of Maple Court Academy
The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the academy was judged to have serious weaknesses in January 2015. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During this inspection, meetings were held with the principal, other senior staff, the executive principal and the Chair of the Governing Body, who also represented the sponsor. The sponsor’s statement of action and the academy’s action plan were evaluated. The inspector made short visits to classrooms to talk to pupils and observe their learning. She scrutinised a sample of pupils’ English and mathematics books and examined a number of documents, including: information about the quality of teaching and pupils’ achievement; communication with parents; the work of governors; and the management of pupils’ behaviour.
p.1
Context
No new teachers have joined the academy since the section 5 inspection in January. Leadership has been restructured. Two directors of learning have been appointed, who will take up their posts in September. Temporary arrangements for some CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566863 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email :jbennett@cfbt.com classes remain as at the time of the inspection in January. Interviews for these posts are scheduled to be held soon.
p.1
The quality of leadership and management at the academy
Strong senior leadership, as at the time of the previous inspection, continues to drive rapid improvement, well focused through the academy’s detailed action plan. Actions are carefully planned against the areas for improvement identified in the section 5 Ofsted report. The plan includes appropriately challenging criteria by which leaders will judge if improvement is being made and pinpoints opportunities for leaders and governors to evaluate the difference individual actions have made. However, it is not clear when leaders will evaluate whether improvement overall is happening as quickly as expected.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the academy
The new staffing structure makes responsibilities clear and establishes strong lines of accountability beyond senior leaders. The two assistant Principals have a clear understanding of what they need to do to improve their designated aspects of the academy. Their actions are well focused and making a difference to pupils’ behaviour and the achievement of younger pupils. The distribution of leadership to all teachers opens up management opportunities for relatively inexperienced teachers. This helps everyone contribute to the sense of shared responsibility for pupils’ achievement that permeates the academy.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the academy
The vice-Principal has implemented a well-planned programme of training and support for teachers. Teachers are receptive to new ideas and readily try new ways of working. This is leading to notable improvement in the quality of teaching. As a result, pupils’ achievement is improving fast. Almost all pupils are now making rapid progress in reading, writing and mathematics. The academy’s detailed and accurate records of achievement show that pupils are making up the ground lost by their previous poor achievement. Most are catching up fast. In spite of such impressive progress, many pupils are still a long way behind where they should be for their ages. This is because their attainment has, until recently, been very low.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the academy
The College Academies Trust keeps a vigilant check on the academy’s work and rigorously holds leaders to account for improvements to pupils’ achievement. The trust has provided appropriate support to help improve the quality of teaching. The trust’s statement of action is closely aligned with the academy’s action plan so provides a secure steer. However, the lack of an overview of expected improvement at key points in the year means governors cannot measure whether improvement is happening quickly enough. Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made:
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the academy
The academy’s action plan is fit for purpose.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the academy
The sponsor’s statement of action is fit for purpose. I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body, and the Director of Children’s Services for Stoke-on-Trent. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion