Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 18 May 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Sandra Hayes

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Sandra Hayes

  • Postcode verified

    ST2 0DQ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+30Mostly positivemore positive than 39% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongrapid progresswell-plannedclearimprovingaccuratesecure
Criticismpoorlacknot clearlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings263w0
  • Leadership432w+30

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
695
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 36%Leadership 60%About the inspection 4%

Full report text

Mr Jonathan Baddeley Maple Court Academy Beverley Drive Stoke-on-Trent Staffordshire ST2 0DQ

p.1

Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of Maple Court Academy

Following my visit to your academy on 28 April 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the outcome and inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the academy’s most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of Maple Court Academy

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the academy was judged to have serious weaknesses in January 2015. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During this inspection, meetings were held with the principal, other senior staff, the executive principal and the Chair of the Governing Body, who also represented the sponsor. The sponsor’s statement of action and the academy’s action plan were evaluated. The inspector made short visits to classrooms to talk to pupils and observe their learning. She scrutinised a sample of pupils’ English and mathematics books and examined a number of documents, including: information about the quality of teaching and pupils’ achievement; communication with parents; the work of governors; and the management of pupils’ behaviour.

p.1

Context

No new teachers have joined the academy since the section 5 inspection in January. Leadership has been restructured. Two directors of learning have been appointed, who will take up their posts in September. Temporary arrangements for some CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566863 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email :jbennett@cfbt.com classes remain as at the time of the inspection in January. Interviews for these posts are scheduled to be held soon.

p.1

The quality of leadership and management at the academy

Strong senior leadership, as at the time of the previous inspection, continues to drive rapid improvement, well focused through the academy’s detailed action plan. Actions are carefully planned against the areas for improvement identified in the section 5 Ofsted report. The plan includes appropriately challenging criteria by which leaders will judge if improvement is being made and pinpoints opportunities for leaders and governors to evaluate the difference individual actions have made. However, it is not clear when leaders will evaluate whether improvement overall is happening as quickly as expected.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the academy

The new staffing structure makes responsibilities clear and establishes strong lines of accountability beyond senior leaders. The two assistant Principals have a clear understanding of what they need to do to improve their designated aspects of the academy. Their actions are well focused and making a difference to pupils’ behaviour and the achievement of younger pupils. The distribution of leadership to all teachers opens up management opportunities for relatively inexperienced teachers. This helps everyone contribute to the sense of shared responsibility for pupils’ achievement that permeates the academy.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the academy

The vice-Principal has implemented a well-planned programme of training and support for teachers. Teachers are receptive to new ideas and readily try new ways of working. This is leading to notable improvement in the quality of teaching. As a result, pupils’ achievement is improving fast. Almost all pupils are now making rapid progress in reading, writing and mathematics. The academy’s detailed and accurate records of achievement show that pupils are making up the ground lost by their previous poor achievement. Most are catching up fast. In spite of such impressive progress, many pupils are still a long way behind where they should be for their ages. This is because their attainment has, until recently, been very low.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the academy

The College Academies Trust keeps a vigilant check on the academy’s work and rigorously holds leaders to account for improvements to pupils’ achievement. The trust has provided appropriate support to help improve the quality of teaching. The trust’s statement of action is closely aligned with the academy’s action plan so provides a secure steer. However, the lack of an overview of expected improvement at key points in the year means governors cannot measure whether improvement is happening quickly enough. Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made:

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the academy

The academy’s action plan is fit for purpose.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the academy

The sponsor’s statement of action is fit for purpose. I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body, and the Director of Children’s Services for Stoke-on-Trent. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion