Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 18 May 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jason Howard

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jason Howard

  • Postcode verified

    NR32 4AH

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+21Mostly positivemore positive than 35% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivehigh qualitypreciserobusteffectivelyengagingstrengthsclear
Criticismat riskvariablefalling behindbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
889
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 37, typical 45
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mr Peter Marshall Principal Ormiston Denes Academy Yarmouth Road Lowestoft NR32 4AH

p.1

Academy

Following my visit to your school on 7 May 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the academy since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Academy

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the academy was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in February 2015. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Academy

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The academy should take further action to ensure that:

p.1

Academy

 all teachers provide precise guidance to students on what they need to do to improve their work  all teachers use questioning to engage students and help them to develop their ideas fully  leaders evaluate the impact of work to increase the attendance of students who are supported by the pupil premium carefully, making changes as required. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9167 Direct email : farhan.aslam@serco.com

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, I held meetings with you, other leaders, a representative of the Orimston Academies Trust and the Chair of the Governing Body to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. I made brief visits to a number of lessons and looked at the way teachers give pupils feedback about their work. I evaluated the academy’s improvement plans and documents relating to the outcomes of monitoring activities.

p.2

Context

Since the previous inspection, the Vice Principal has left the school and an acting Vice Principal has been appointed to lead improvements in teaching and learning. New arrangements have been made for the leadership of provision for students who have special educational needs, and for the development of literacy across the curriculum.

p.2

Main findings

You are ensuring that both new and established leaders are working to improve the quality of teaching and learning, and the impact of the feedback that students receive on their work. Senior and subject leaders are using effective systems to monitor standards, and are taking urgent and robust action to support and challenge teachers where these are not high enough. Leaders responsible for disabled students and those who have special educational needs are providing teachers with additional information on how to work most effectively with teaching assistants and best support individual students. Governors, together with the Ormiston Academies Trust Progress Board, are holding you and other leaders to account by making regular checks on the impact of the actions taken to achieve the academy’s improvement plan objectives.

p.2

Main findings

The acting Vice Principal for teaching and learning has established a clear and appropriate set of priorities for improvement, working with a team that is helping to implement the necessary changes. Teachers are benefiting from well-targeted, high quality training and support. Subject leaders have changed course plans so that these include a greater number of opportunities for students to practise their extended writing. The literacy leader is working with teachers from each subject area in order to plan additional ways to develop students’ literacy skills.

p.2

Main findings

Increasingly, teachers are using their accurate monitoring information about students’ progress to plan engaging activities that help those of different abilities to move forward. Regular checks on the progress of individual students are enabling swift support to be given to those at risk of falling behind. However, the effectiveness of teachers’ questioning remains variable. Sometimes it does not engage more than a minority of students, or encourage them to develop their ideas fully. Your monitoring, as well as scrutiny during this inspection, indicates that in most subjects students receive precise feedback on their work that shows them how to improve; particular strengths are evident in modern foreign languages, geography and English. The precision of feedback remains variable, particularly within mathematics; sometimes students do not understand what they need to improve or how to do so. This means they continue to make the same mistakes.

p.2

Main findings

The attendance rate of students who are supported by the pupil premium remains below that of others. Plans are in place to recruit an additional member of staff who will work with parents and students to drive up the attendance of this group.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further monitoring inspections and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

Representatives of the Ormiston Academies Trust are helping you to monitor progress towards the academy’s improvement plans. Reviews, including a recent audit of provision for students who have special educational needs, are helping to both inform these plans and test the impact of actions already taken to raise standards. Teachers are working with their colleagues in other schools to confirm the accuracy of the marks or grades they apply to students’ work.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, and the Director of Children’s Services for Suffolk.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

cc. Appropriate authority - Chair of the Governing Body/Interim Executive Board cc. Local authority cc. The academy chain where relevant cc. [For academies only] [ CausingConcern.SCHOOLS@education.gsi.gov.uk ]

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion