Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 15 May 2015

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Patrick Geraghty

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Patrick Geraghty

  • Postcode verified

    M23 2YS

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−34Criticalmore positive than 9% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praisestrongclearrobuststrengthsconsistentlyimprovedimproving
Criticismseriousweaknessespoorconcernsdisruptionstrugglevariablebelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadership positive critical
  • Findings255w−80
  • Leadership708w−1

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
963
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 38, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 26%Leadership 74%

Full report text

Mrs Fiona Minshall Headteacher Saint Paul's Catholic High School Firbank Road Manchester M23 2YS

p.1

High School

Following my visit to your academy on 23 April 2015, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the outcome and inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the academy’s most recent section 5 inspection. The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the academy was judged to have serious weaknesses in January 2015. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During this inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher, senior leaders, a group of heads of department, the Chair of the Governing Body and four other governors, a representative of the diocese of Shrewsbury and a representative of the local authority. I also held discussions with a group of students and spoke with many students during break and lunch times. A learning walk around the academy was undertaken. The academy trust and the academy improvement and action plans were scrutinised.

p.1

Context

There have been no substantive changes to staffing or any change in the academy’s status since the section 5 inspection which judged the academy to have serious weaknesses. CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566 855 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email : gnewton@cfbt.com

p.1

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The academy improvement plan prioritises the areas for improvement identified at the last inspection. The headteacher and senior leaders demonstrate a well-focused and purposeful approach to improvement planning. The detailed improvement plan conveys a clear direction, details accountability and allows for opportunities for impact to be evaluated. Data, tracking and monitoring systems have been sharpened and there is now a clearer view of current student progress and needs. Intervention systems are better developed but require further strengthening, particularly in relation to tackling individual student needs and the development of appropriate curriculum pathways. A review of the curriculum structure has been undertaken and significant changes will be introduced in September 2015. Progress boards are well used to chart individual student improvement in Year 11 and 10. Systems are in place to ensure that pupil premium funding (additional government funding) is more

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

appropriately targeted and monitored. The academy continues to struggle with teacher recruitment in key areas.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

I raised concerns during the monitoring inspection with regard to the current progress of Year 11 students. Current and robust academy data indicate that attainment at the end of the current Year 11 will remain largely static when compared to the previous year and in relation to the percentage of five A* to C, including English and mathematics, GCSE grades attained. There remains a strong possibility that the academy’s results for this attainment measure will be below the government floor standards for a second year. Current data on Year 10 students indicate that they are making better progress. The headteacher, senior leaders and governors are aware of the urgent need to improve both the progress and attainment of students by the end of Year 11.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Programmes are now in place to share the best practice in teaching and learning. However, senior leaders recognise that the opportunities for the sharing of good practice need to be further extended and developed. Learning walks of the academy are regularly undertaken by senior staff and teachers are provided with clear feedback on strengths and areas for improvement. Academy records indicate that student behaviour is improving. However, students told the inspector that behaviour in classes remains too variable and that they experience too much disruption to their learning because of the poor behaviour of some students. Senior leaders are acutely aware of the need for academy behaviour codes to be applied consistently across all provision.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

There is both greater support for and greater accountability expected of middle managers. A development programme is now in place to enhance the further effectiveness and accountability of middle leaders. This remains at an early stage and further work is required so that middle managers fully embrace their responsibilities, particularly in relation to the quality of teaching and learning and implementation of academy behaviour rules within their areas of responsibility. Currently, senior leaders are undertaking a review of the Key Stage 3 curriculum with the aim of enhancing and embedding students’ literacy and numeracy skills. Current academy data indicate that students’ reading ages at both Key Stage 3 and 4 have improved as a result of intervention programmes. However, the academy has further work to do to promote a more active culture of reading for pleasure, particularly through the role and use of the academy library. I discussed with the

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

headteacher the need to engage students more fully as participants in the development of an aspirational and improvement culture. Academy leaders have committed to reflect on these discussions.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The size of the governing body has been reduced and a central strategic group formed. The monitoring and evaluation of academy performance has been strengthened. I have recommended that the governors review the progress of those students eligible for support through the pupil premium half termly so as to bring them into line with the practice of senior leaders. There has been a review of governance and recommendations have been acted upon.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made:

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The academy’s improvement and action plans are fit for purpose.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The academy trust’s statement of action is fit for purpose.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body and the Interim Director of Children's Services for Manchester. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion