Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)

Horrington House Pre School

Inspected 20 Apr 2015 · published 14 May 2015 · URN 143008

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Julie Bright

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    20 Apr 2015

  • Inspectors verified

    Julie Bright

  • Early years AI-checked

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Outstanding

  • Postcode verified

    BA5 3EB

  • Name on report verified

    Horrington House Pre- school

  • URN verified

    143008

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+21Mostly positivemore positive than 67% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelygood progressstronghappyknowledgeablepositivelyenjoyaccurately
Criticismfailsinsufficientnot alwayslimitednot effectivelynot clearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings85w0
  • What needs to improve739w+21

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
749
about usual (typical 773)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 6%What needs to improve 55%About the inspection 38%

Full report text

Horrington House Pre- school Horrington School House, Bath Road, West Horrington, Wells, Somerset, BA5 3EB

p.1

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 20 April 2015 12 December 2011

p.1

3

Previous inspection: Outstanding 1 How well the early years provision meets the needs of the range of children who attend Requires improvement The contribution of the early years provision to the well-being of children Requires improvement The effectiveness of the leadership and management of the early years provision Requires improvement The setting does not meet legal requirements for early years settings

p.1

This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:

 Staff do not consider the individual needs of all children in their planning, or accurately identify children's next steps for learning, to provide sufficient challenge to sustain children's interest and promote their learning.  Children who learn English as an additional language do not have their development effectively monitored to ensure they are making adequate progress in their communication and social skills.  Children's home cultures and languages are not reflected visually, verbally or in planning to respect their backgrounds and help support their good progress.  In the outdoors, children do not have access to a wide range of natural resources to help them follow self-chosen interests and learn more about the world around them.  Staff do not provide sufficient opportunities for children to develop their independence and self-care skills.

p.1

It has the following strengths

 Staff have strong links with the teachers with the on-site school which helps children's move to school.  Staff have good relationships with children, who are generally settled and happy.  Staff are trained and knowledgeable about how to safeguard children. The environment is safe for children to play and learn.  Partnership with parents is evident because they are well informed about their children's learning and are included in decision making.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To meet the requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage the provider must:

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

 consider the individual needs, interests, and stage of development of each child, and use this information to plan meaningful next steps for learning and a range of challenging and enjoyable experiences for each child in all areas of learning and development  improve the monitoring of children's progress, particularly for those who are learning English as an additional language, to ensure that they are making progress in their social and communication skills.

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

 increase opportunities for children to manage their own personal independence and self-care skills throughout the day  extend children's opportunities to make choices about their own play outdoors, and allow them to follow their interests, by ensuring resources are accessible  increase the use of labelling and the range of resources which reflects and values children's home languages and heritage.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector carried out a joint observation with the manager in the outside learning environment  The inspector observed activities indoors and outdoors.  The inspector spoke to parents and took account of their views on the day of the inspection.  The inspector looked at children's records, planning documentation, the self-evaluation process, evidence of the suitability of staff working in the provision, and policies and procedures.  The inspector spoke to members of staff and children at appropriate times during the inspection, and held meetings with the committee chairperson and manager.

p.2

who attend. This requires improvement

Parents speak very positively of relationships with staff and the information they receive. Staff routinely plan and deliver educational programmes that cover all areas of learning and development. However, they do not use children's interests to plan and provide children with activities that challenge or maintain their interest. Planning does not clearly identify children's next steps. As a result, some children become bored and uninterested, which affects their ability to learn. Resources are set up on tables and on the floor, giving children opportunity to participate in adult-led and self-chosen activities. Children enjoy listening to stories and benefit from group discussions, although some children fidget and find it difficult to concentrate. Staff provide varied opportunities for children to learn and develop in the outdoors. However, the pre-school garden provides insufficient opportunity for independent access to a variety of natural resources to support children's interests.

p.3

requires improvement

Children have limited opportunities to act independently as staff over-compensate for children's individual abilities, particularly in relation to the learning of self-help skills such as toileting, hand washing, and preparing and serving their own meals. Therefore, children are not able to learn the skills they need to be ready to move to school. Staff generally help children build good relationships with each other. Children benefit from healthy and nutritionally balanced snacks. Children learn to manage their own behaviour well because staff use behaviour management techniques appropriately.

p.3

provision requires improvement

Partnerships with parents are generally good. However, staff do not always encourage parents to share children's learning experiences from home. Therefore, this information is not used in the assessment process to effectively plan children's next steps. Staff are suitably qualified, with all holding paediatric first-aid certificates. Staff attend further training to remain up to date. Management monitors the quality of teaching through weekly meetings, staff-on-staff observations, supervisions and annual appraisals. However, management fails to effectively monitor progress of all children's learning. Planning does not stem from children's interests or reflect inclusivity, and activities and experiences do not fully support children's progress in their next steps of learning. Management encourages staff reflection during daily discussions and the sharing of some ideas for improvement. Individual staff attend various training courses but these are not

p.3

provision requires improvement

always shared with other staff to help improve outcomes for children.

p.3

Setting details

Unique reference number 143008 Local authority Somerset Inspection number 825813 Type of provision Sessional provision Registration category Childcare - Non-Domestic Age range of children 0 - 8 Total number of places 16 Number of children on roll 29 Name of provider Horrington House Pre-school Committee Date of previous inspection 12 December 2011 Telephone number 01749 673 516

p.4

Setting details

Horrington House Pre-school has been registered since 1987 and is a committee run pre- school situated in the grounds of Horrington Primary School, in Wells, Somerset. It is open from 9am to 3.30pm, Monday to Friday, term time only. The pre-school provides funding for the provision of free early education for children aged two, three and four. There are four members of staff working with the children, of these, one has a relevant qualification to level 4 and two at level 3.

p.4

Setting details

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the Early Years Foundation Stage.

p.4

Setting details

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Setting details

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.5

Setting details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion